Cards like Myr Retriever
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
62% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
2.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
- Myr Retriever 61%
- Junk Diver 56%
- Scrap Trawler 51%
- Workshop Assistant 34%
- Spine of Ish Sah 5%
Cards like Nimblewright Schematic
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Etherium Sculptor
3.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
- Etherium Sculptor 54%
- Foundry Inspector 45%
- Cloud Key 22%
- Helm of Awakening 1%
Other options: Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate
Cards like Hangarback Walker
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Sparring Construct
Cards like Prismite
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Prismite 37%
- Stonework Packbeast 22%
- Signpost Scarecrow 8%
- Pili-Pala 2%
Other options: Mystic Skull // Mystic Monstrosity, Shire Scarecrow, Three Tree Mascot, Salvaged Manaworker, Scarecrow Guide
Cards like Thousand-Year Elixir
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Jandor's Saddlebags
Cards like Vizier of Tumbling Sands
6.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Shore Up
3.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Shore Up 30%
- Octopus Form 15%
- Magic Damper 14%
- Dive Down 4%
- Chase Inspiration 2%
- Mizzium Skin 1%
- You See a Guard Approach 1%
Other options: Glint, Shell Shield
Cards like Sol Ring
1.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 56%
- Basalt Monolith 31%
- Mana Vault 7%
- Grim Monolith 6%
Cards like Urn of Godfire
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like The Reality Chip
7.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards like Cryogen Relic
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
- Cryogen Relic 22%
- Sewer-veillance Cam 18%
Cards like Trinket Mage
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards
- Trinket Mage 21%
- Trophy Mage 19%
- Tribute Mage 13%
- Treasure Mage 3%
- Transit Mage 1%
Cards like Mystic Forge
3.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Vedalken Archmage
4.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Skyswimmer Koi, Rook Turret
Cards like Wizard's Rockets
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Slagwurm Armor
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Slagwurm Armor 26%
- Kite Shield 7%
- Pennon Blade 1%
Other options: Greatsword, Vulshok Battlegear, Barbed Battlegear, Warlord's Axe
Cards like Sky Diamond
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mirran Spy
6.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards like Fabricate
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 28%
- Scour for Scrap 18%
Cards like Liquimetal Torque
5.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards like Aether Spellbomb
3.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Wayfarer's Bauble
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Traveler's Amulet, World Map, Keys to the House, Braidwood Sextant, Ominous Parcel, Renegade Map, Wanderer's Twig
All top picks (50)
- Animation Module relevance 0.61 · 56.1% (55 of 98 decks)
- Urn of Godfire relevance 0.67 · 42.9% (42 of 98 decks)
- Nimblewright Schematic relevance 0.62 · 46.9% (46 of 98 decks)
- Prismite relevance 0.67 · 36.7% (36 of 98 decks)
- Servo Schematic relevance 0.58 · 39.8% (39 of 98 decks)
- Energy Refractor relevance 0.56 · 39.8% (39 of 98 decks)
- Junk Diver relevance 0.46 · 56.1% (55 of 98 decks)
- Stonework Packbeast relevance 0.63 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.59 · 23.5% (23 of 98 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.54 · 26.5% (26 of 98 decks)
- Prized Statue relevance 0.45 · 44.9% (44 of 98 decks)
- Slagwurm Armor relevance 0.52 · 25.5% (25 of 98 decks)
- Workshop Assistant relevance 0.47 · 33.7% (33 of 98 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.37 · 55.1% (54 of 98 decks)
- Myr Retriever relevance 0.35 · 61.2% (60 of 98 decks)
- Crossroads Candleguide relevance 0.58 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Mycosynth Wellspring relevance 0.46 · 30.6% (30 of 98 decks)
- Esoteric Duplicator relevance 0.45 · 27.6% (27 of 98 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.35 · 51.0% (50 of 98 decks)
- Prophet of Distortion relevance 0.51 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Iron Apprentice relevance 0.48 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Wizard's Rockets relevance 0.48 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.37 · 39.8% (39 of 98 decks)
- Nuka-Cola Vending Machine relevance 0.44 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Signpost Scarecrow relevance 0.52 · 8.2% (8 of 98 decks)
- Retrofitter Foundry relevance 0.37 · 29.6% (29 of 98 decks)
- Vigean Graftmage relevance 0.46 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Mirran Spy relevance 0.32 · 39.8% (39 of 98 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.33 · 38.8% (38 of 98 decks)
- Cogwork Assembler relevance 0.43 · 12.2% (12 of 98 decks)
- War Barge relevance 0.46 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.39 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Gemstone Array relevance 0.44 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Doubling Cube relevance 0.39 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.24 · 63.3% (62 of 98 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.36 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Goblin Firebomb relevance 0.44 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Thaumaton Torpedo relevance 0.43 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- C.A.M.P. relevance 0.43 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Magus of the Future relevance 0.39 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.28 · 44.9% (44 of 98 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.25 · 56.1% (55 of 98 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.23 · 63.3% (62 of 98 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.33 · 27.6% (27 of 98 decks)
- Slagstone Refinery relevance 0.40 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Stridehangar Automaton relevance 0.32 · 30.6% (30 of 98 decks)
- Ringing Strike Mastery relevance 0.40 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Hangarback Walker relevance 0.32 · 29.6% (29 of 98 decks)
- Diviner's Wand relevance 0.38 · 12.2% (12 of 98 decks)
- Ring of Evos Isle relevance 0.36 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Prismite relevance 0.67 · 36.7% (36 of 98 decks)
- Junk Diver relevance 0.46 · 56.1% (55 of 98 decks)
- Stonework Packbeast relevance 0.63 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Workshop Assistant relevance 0.47 · 33.7% (33 of 98 decks)
- Myr Retriever relevance 0.35 · 61.2% (60 of 98 decks)
- Crossroads Candleguide relevance 0.58 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.35 · 51.0% (50 of 98 decks)
- Prophet of Distortion relevance 0.51 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Iron Apprentice relevance 0.48 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Signpost Scarecrow relevance 0.52 · 8.2% (8 of 98 decks)
- Vigean Graftmage relevance 0.46 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Mirran Spy relevance 0.32 · 39.8% (39 of 98 decks)
- Cogwork Assembler relevance 0.43 · 12.2% (12 of 98 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.24 · 63.3% (62 of 98 decks)
- Magus of the Future relevance 0.39 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.25 · 56.1% (55 of 98 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.23 · 63.3% (62 of 98 decks)
- Stridehangar Automaton relevance 0.32 · 30.6% (30 of 98 decks)
- Hangarback Walker relevance 0.32 · 29.6% (29 of 98 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.31 · 25.5% (25 of 98 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.27 · 36.7% (36 of 98 decks)
- Marketback Walker relevance 0.33 · 12.2% (12 of 98 decks)
- Memnarch relevance 0.30 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Nick Valentine, Private Eye relevance 0.34 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Threefold Thunderhulk relevance 0.30 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.23 · 42.9% (42 of 98 decks)
- Chrome Host Seedshark relevance 0.28 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
- The Mechanist, Aerial Artisan relevance 0.29 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Third Path Savant relevance 0.36 · 5.1% (5 of 98 decks)
- Thran Spider relevance 0.34 · 7.1% (7 of 98 decks)
- Galvanic Alchemist relevance 0.36 · 5.1% (5 of 98 decks)
- Dimensional Infiltrator relevance 0.36 · 5.1% (5 of 98 decks)
- Golden Guardian // Gold-Forge Garrison relevance 0.34 · 6.1% (6 of 98 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.19 · 54.1% (53 of 98 decks)
- Mm'menon, the Right Hand relevance 0.27 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Hypnotic Grifter relevance 0.34 · 5.1% (5 of 98 decks)
- Osgood, Operation Double relevance 0.32 · 8.2% (8 of 98 decks)
- Faerie Artisans relevance 0.29 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Whirler Rogue relevance 0.26 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Tymora's Invoker relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.20 · 44.9% (44 of 98 decks)
- Canoptek Spyder relevance 0.32 · 7.1% (7 of 98 decks)
- Fblthp, Lost on the Range relevance 0.30 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Steel Hellkite relevance 0.27 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 0.26 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Corridor Monitor relevance 0.27 · 12.2% (12 of 98 decks)
- Floodhound relevance 0.31 · 5.1% (5 of 98 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.25 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 0.24 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.27 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Animation Module relevance 0.61 · 56.1% (55 of 98 decks)
- Urn of Godfire relevance 0.67 · 42.9% (42 of 98 decks)
- Nimblewright Schematic relevance 0.62 · 46.9% (46 of 98 decks)
- Servo Schematic relevance 0.58 · 39.8% (39 of 98 decks)
- Energy Refractor relevance 0.56 · 39.8% (39 of 98 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.59 · 23.5% (23 of 98 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.54 · 26.5% (26 of 98 decks)
- Prized Statue relevance 0.45 · 44.9% (44 of 98 decks)
- Slagwurm Armor relevance 0.52 · 25.5% (25 of 98 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.37 · 55.1% (54 of 98 decks)
- Mycosynth Wellspring relevance 0.46 · 30.6% (30 of 98 decks)
- Esoteric Duplicator relevance 0.45 · 27.6% (27 of 98 decks)
- Wizard's Rockets relevance 0.48 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.37 · 39.8% (39 of 98 decks)
- Nuka-Cola Vending Machine relevance 0.44 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Retrofitter Foundry relevance 0.37 · 29.6% (29 of 98 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.33 · 38.8% (38 of 98 decks)
- War Barge relevance 0.46 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.39 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Gemstone Array relevance 0.44 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Doubling Cube relevance 0.39 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.36 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Goblin Firebomb relevance 0.44 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Thaumaton Torpedo relevance 0.43 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- C.A.M.P. relevance 0.43 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.28 · 44.9% (44 of 98 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.33 · 27.6% (27 of 98 decks)
- Slagstone Refinery relevance 0.40 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Diviner's Wand relevance 0.38 · 12.2% (12 of 98 decks)
- Ring of Evos Isle relevance 0.36 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.33 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
- Tarrian's Soulcleaver relevance 0.36 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Mirror Shield relevance 0.38 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Boom Box relevance 0.40 · 7.1% (7 of 98 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.24 · 45.9% (45 of 98 decks)
- Semblance Anvil relevance 0.31 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Perilous Vault relevance 0.38 · 7.1% (7 of 98 decks)
- Winged Boots relevance 0.30 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Unstable Obelisk relevance 0.35 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.28 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.29 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.30 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Psychic Paper relevance 0.35 · 7.1% (7 of 98 decks)
- Swashbuckler's Whip relevance 0.37 · 5.1% (5 of 98 decks)
- Goblin Cannon relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (6 of 98 decks)
- Summoning Station relevance 0.34 · 7.1% (7 of 98 decks)
- Aetheric Amplifier relevance 0.30 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Lunatic Pandora relevance 0.33 · 7.1% (7 of 98 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.27 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.27 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
All enchantments (42)
- Ringing Strike Mastery relevance 0.40 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Crab Umbra relevance 0.35 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Singing Bell Strike relevance 0.39 · 6.1% (6 of 98 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.29 · 25.5% (25 of 98 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.31 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Thassa's Ire relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (6 of 98 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.24 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Fortune Teller's Talent relevance 0.28 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.25 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.25 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.24 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.22 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.19 · 12.2% (12 of 98 decks)
- Lofty Dreams relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (5 of 98 decks)
- Aura of Dominion relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
- Sinking Feeling relevance 0.23 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (7 of 98 decks)
- Immobilizing Ink relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Zephid's Embrace relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Zoetic Glyph relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.13 · 5.1% (5 of 98 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.13 · 5.1% (5 of 98 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.11 · 8.2% (8 of 98 decks)
- Curious Inquiry relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Mystic Redaction relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Aquitect's Defenses relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- The Antiquities War relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Lost in the Maze relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (7 of 98 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.07 · 8.2% (8 of 98 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.09 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.05 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.07 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
All instants (50)
- Shore Up relevance 0.27 · 29.6% (29 of 98 decks)
- Reality Ripple relevance 0.32 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.24 · 27.6% (27 of 98 decks)
- Masterful Replication relevance 0.29 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.25 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Suit Up relevance 0.29 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
- Disruption Protocol relevance 0.25 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.19 · 27.6% (27 of 98 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.21 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Brackish Blunder relevance 0.28 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.20 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.23 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Metallic Rebuke relevance 0.25 · 7.1% (7 of 98 decks)
- Desculpting Blast relevance 0.25 · 6.1% (6 of 98 decks)
- Change of Plans relevance 0.23 · 5.1% (5 of 98 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.20 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.16 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
- Stern Lesson relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
- Traumatic Visions relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Deduce relevance 0.20 · 6.1% (6 of 98 decks)
- Launch Mishap relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (5 of 98 decks)
- Stroke of Genius relevance 0.20 · 6.1% (6 of 98 decks)
- Triton Tactics relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Access Denied relevance 0.19 · 6.1% (6 of 98 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.18 · 6.1% (6 of 98 decks)
- Secrets of the Key relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.17 · 6.1% (6 of 98 decks)
- Stoic Rebuttal relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.15 · 8.2% (8 of 98 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (7 of 98 decks)
- Depart the Realm relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.10 · 35.7% (35 of 98 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
- Domineering Will relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.11 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Reality Heist relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.10 · 26.5% (26 of 98 decks)
- Chain Stasis relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.10 · 28.6% (28 of 98 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.13 · 6.1% (6 of 98 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.09 · 32.7% (32 of 98 decks)
- Divert Disaster relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Majestic Metamorphosis relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
All sorceries (27)
- Forging the Anchor relevance 0.34 · 8.2% (8 of 98 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.20 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.15 · 27.6% (27 of 98 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.18 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (5 of 98 decks)
- Hard Evidence relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.15 · 8.2% (8 of 98 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.16 · 5.1% (5 of 98 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.15 · 6.1% (6 of 98 decks)
- Reverse Engineer relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.13 · 6.1% (6 of 98 decks)
- Drafna's Restoration relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Step Between Worlds relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Argivian Restoration relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.08 · 8.2% (8 of 98 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.08 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.06 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.04 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (7)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.27 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (7 of 98 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.13 · 6.1% (6 of 98 decks)
- Jace Reawakened relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Hall of Tagsin relevance 0.45 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Voldaren Estate relevance 0.52 · 8.2% (8 of 98 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.38 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Mirrex relevance 0.37 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.36 · 23.5% (23 of 98 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.37 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.31 · 30.6% (30 of 98 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.21 · 46.9% (46 of 98 decks)
- Ominous Cemetery relevance 0.33 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.29 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.27 · 12.2% (12 of 98 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.24 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.29 · 7.1% (7 of 98 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.19 · 38.8% (38 of 98 decks)
- Baxter Building relevance 0.30 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Tomb of the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.27 · 8.2% (8 of 98 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.26 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.17 · 44.9% (44 of 98 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.26 · 8.2% (8 of 98 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.20 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.18 · 25.5% (25 of 98 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.21 · 12.2% (12 of 98 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 35.7% (35 of 98 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.18 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Eden, Seat of the Sanctum relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.22 · 5.1% (5 of 98 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.16 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.16 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.15 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.17 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.15 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.16 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Labyrinth of Skophos relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.13 · 25.5% (25 of 98 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.16 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Hall of Oracles relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Cave of Temptation relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.14 · 5.1% (5 of 98 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.14 · 5.1% (5 of 98 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Captivating Cave relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (20)
- Cascading Cataracts relevance 0.58 · 23.5% (23 of 98 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (49 of 98 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.20 · 30.6% (30 of 98 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.26 · 8.2% (8 of 98 decks)
- Shrine of the Forsaken Gods relevance 0.26 · 6.1% (6 of 98 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.15 · 8.2% (8 of 98 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (7 of 98 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (7 of 98 decks)
- Unknown Shores relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.15 · 5.1% (5 of 98 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (7 of 98 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.13 · 6.1% (6 of 98 decks)
- The Everflowing Well // The Myriad Pools relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.08 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 86.7% (85 of 98 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Clan Crafter // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher, from 98 real Commander partner decks.