Cards like Attuma, Atlantean Warlord
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
64% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Master of the Pearl Trident
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
63% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Harmonized Crescendo
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Deeproot Pilgrimage
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Pongify
1.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
45% of decks run two or more
vs. 24% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 62%
- Rapid Hybridization 57%
Cards like Bident of Thassa
4.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Opt
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Force of Negation
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Negation 34%
- Force of Will 33%
Cards like Counterspell
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
95% of decks run one or more
vs. 68% of other blue decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 31% of other blue decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Counterspell 92%
- Negate 44%
- Essence Scatter 4%
- Spell Snare 3%
- Minor Misstep 2%
- Nullify 1%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Stern Scolding, False Summoning, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Outwit
Cards like Hydro-Channeler
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Unblinking Observer, Pelargir Survivor
Cards like Abjure
10× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards like Archmage's Charm
4.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards
- Archmage's Charm 77%
- Artistic Refusal 7%
- Confounding Riddle 2%
- You Find the Villains' Lair 2%
- Thassa's Intervention 2%
- Confusticate and Bebother 1%
- Spellgyre 1%
Other options: Runeboggle, Force Void, Supreme Will, Soul Read
Cards like Preordain
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Preordain 49%
- Serum Visions 14%
Other options: Deliberate, Scour All Possibilities, Foresee, Tamiyo's Epiphany, Introduction to Prophecy
Cards like Kindred Discovery
8.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Spell Pierce
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
- Spell Pierce 28%
- Mana Leak 8%
- It'll Quench Ya! 5%
- Lose Focus 1%
- Force Spike 1%
- Logic Knot 1%
- Don't Make a Sound 1%
- Quench 1%
Other options: Reasonable Doubt, Make Disappear, Revolutionary Rebuff, Metallic Rebuke, Rethink
Cards like Cryptic Command
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Stock Up
6.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards like Patchwork Banner
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Transcendent Message
7.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Narset's Reversal
4.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Narset's Reversal 35%
- Twincast 5%
- Insidious Will 3%
Cards like Banner of Kinship
7.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Commandeer
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
- Commandeer 15%
- Misdirection 10%
- Disrupting Shoal 1%
- Snapback 1%
Cards like Roaming Throne
4.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Ponder
3.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Mist Dancer
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards like Disallow
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
- Disallow 23%
- Stifle 6%
- Tale's End 4%
- Consign to Memory 3%
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 42%
- Mystic Remora 34%
All top picks (50)
- Master of the Pearl Trident relevance 0.54 · 75.8% (75 of 99 decks)
- Vodalian Hexcatcher relevance 0.53 · 76.8% (76 of 99 decks)
- Attuma, Atlantean Warlord relevance 0.56 · 62.6% (62 of 99 decks)
- Lord of Atlantis relevance 0.54 · 66.7% (66 of 99 decks)
- Merfolk Sovereign relevance 0.53 · 59.6% (59 of 99 decks)
- Svyelun of Sea and Sky relevance 0.54 · 56.6% (56 of 99 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.44 · 74.7% (74 of 99 decks)
- Lullmage Mentor relevance 0.49 · 60.6% (60 of 99 decks)
- Merrow Reejerey relevance 0.53 · 49.5% (49 of 99 decks)
- Kopala, Warden of Waves relevance 0.53 · 46.5% (46 of 99 decks)
- Deeproot Pilgrimage relevance 0.53 · 45.5% (45 of 99 decks)
- Transcendent Message relevance 0.47 · 55.6% (55 of 99 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.41 · 66.7% (66 of 99 decks)
- Merrow Commerce relevance 0.54 · 38.4% (38 of 99 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 0.48 · 46.5% (46 of 99 decks)
- Seafloor Oracle relevance 0.52 · 39.4% (39 of 99 decks)
- Emperor Mihail II relevance 0.53 · 34.3% (34 of 99 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.45 · 47.5% (47 of 99 decks)
- Secret of Bloodbending relevance 0.47 · 40.4% (40 of 99 decks)
- Mist Dancer relevance 0.53 · 29.3% (29 of 99 decks)
- Wanderwine Prophets relevance 0.52 · 30.3% (30 of 99 decks)
- Daughter of the Deep relevance 0.52 · 24.2% (24 of 99 decks)
- Deeproot Waters relevance 0.51 · 25.3% (25 of 99 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.39 · 48.5% (48 of 99 decks)
- Merrow Harbinger relevance 0.49 · 21.2% (21 of 99 decks)
- Harmonized Trio // Brainstorm relevance 0.37 · 47.5% (47 of 99 decks)
- Deepchannel Mentor relevance 0.48 · 21.2% (21 of 99 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.38 · 42.4% (42 of 99 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.33 · 53.5% (53 of 99 decks)
- Inundate relevance 0.41 · 31.3% (31 of 99 decks)
- Mindspring Merfolk relevance 0.47 · 17.2% (17 of 99 decks)
- Rimefire Torque relevance 0.43 · 25.3% (25 of 99 decks)
- Abjure relevance 0.36 · 41.4% (41 of 99 decks)
- Seahunter relevance 0.47 · 14.1% (14 of 99 decks)
- Harbinger of the Seas relevance 0.32 · 51.5% (51 of 99 decks)
- Namor, Scourge of the Seas relevance 0.48 · 11.1% (11 of 99 decks)
- Hydro-Channeler relevance 0.43 · 16.2% (16 of 99 decks)
- Invasion of Segovia // Caetus, Sea Tyrant of Segovia relevance 0.39 · 25.3% (25 of 99 decks)
- Nanogene Conversion relevance 0.43 · 15.2% (15 of 99 decks)
- Invoke the Winds relevance 0.40 · 22.2% (22 of 99 decks)
- Fated Infatuation relevance 0.40 · 18.2% (18 of 99 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.37 · 27.3% (27 of 99 decks)
- Stonybrook Banneret relevance 0.36 · 28.3% (28 of 99 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.36 · 28.3% (28 of 99 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.33 · 33.3% (33 of 99 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.34 · 30.3% (30 of 99 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.21 · 76.8% (76 of 99 decks)
- Reenact the Crime relevance 0.39 · 16.2% (16 of 99 decks)
- Unexpected Assistance relevance 0.40 · 13.1% (13 of 99 decks)
- Mister Fantastic, Reed Richards relevance 0.39 · 14.1% (14 of 99 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Master of the Pearl Trident relevance 0.54 · 75.8% (75 of 99 decks)
- Vodalian Hexcatcher relevance 0.53 · 76.8% (76 of 99 decks)
- Attuma, Atlantean Warlord relevance 0.56 · 62.6% (62 of 99 decks)
- Lord of Atlantis relevance 0.54 · 66.7% (66 of 99 decks)
- Merfolk Sovereign relevance 0.53 · 59.6% (59 of 99 decks)
- Svyelun of Sea and Sky relevance 0.54 · 56.6% (56 of 99 decks)
- Lullmage Mentor relevance 0.49 · 60.6% (60 of 99 decks)
- Merrow Reejerey relevance 0.53 · 49.5% (49 of 99 decks)
- Kopala, Warden of Waves relevance 0.53 · 46.5% (46 of 99 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 0.48 · 46.5% (46 of 99 decks)
- Seafloor Oracle relevance 0.52 · 39.4% (39 of 99 decks)
- Emperor Mihail II relevance 0.53 · 34.3% (34 of 99 decks)
- Mist Dancer relevance 0.53 · 29.3% (29 of 99 decks)
- Wanderwine Prophets relevance 0.52 · 30.3% (30 of 99 decks)
- Daughter of the Deep relevance 0.52 · 24.2% (24 of 99 decks)
- Merrow Harbinger relevance 0.49 · 21.2% (21 of 99 decks)
- Harmonized Trio // Brainstorm relevance 0.37 · 47.5% (47 of 99 decks)
- Deepchannel Mentor relevance 0.48 · 21.2% (21 of 99 decks)
- Mindspring Merfolk relevance 0.47 · 17.2% (17 of 99 decks)
- Seahunter relevance 0.47 · 14.1% (14 of 99 decks)
- Harbinger of the Seas relevance 0.32 · 51.5% (51 of 99 decks)
- Namor, Scourge of the Seas relevance 0.48 · 11.1% (11 of 99 decks)
- Hydro-Channeler relevance 0.43 · 16.2% (16 of 99 decks)
- Stonybrook Banneret relevance 0.36 · 28.3% (28 of 99 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.36 · 28.3% (28 of 99 decks)
- Mister Fantastic, Reed Richards relevance 0.39 · 14.1% (14 of 99 decks)
- Volshe Tideturner relevance 0.37 · 11.1% (11 of 99 decks)
- Harbinger of the Tides relevance 0.35 · 8.1% (8 of 99 decks)
- Thada Adel, Acquisitor relevance 0.33 · 9.1% (9 of 99 decks)
- Tide Shaper relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Metallic Mimic relevance 0.34 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Coralhelm Commander relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Landscape Painter // Vibrant Idea relevance 0.37 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Tishana's Tidebinder relevance 0.27 · 21.2% (21 of 99 decks)
- Atlantean Cavalry relevance 0.36 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 0.26 · 21.2% (21 of 99 decks)
- Tempest Caller relevance 0.33 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.23 · 28.3% (28 of 99 decks)
- Brineborn Cutthroat relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- River Sneak relevance 0.32 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Thieving Skydiver relevance 0.28 · 9.1% (9 of 99 decks)
- Merfolk Trickster relevance 0.29 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Loki, Lord of Misrule relevance 0.31 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Vodalian Arcanist relevance 0.28 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Disruptor of Currents relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Kiora, the Rising Tide relevance 0.26 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Cursecatcher relevance 0.26 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Irma, Part-Time Mutant relevance 0.25 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Titan of Littjara relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.38 · 42.4% (42 of 99 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.33 · 53.5% (53 of 99 decks)
- Rimefire Torque relevance 0.43 · 25.3% (25 of 99 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.37 · 27.3% (27 of 99 decks)
- Orcrist, Goblin-cleaver relevance 0.44 · 8.1% (8 of 99 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.36 · 17.2% (17 of 99 decks)
- Stoneforge Masterwork relevance 0.40 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- White Lotus Tile relevance 0.36 · 9.1% (9 of 99 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.36 · 9.1% (9 of 99 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.34 · 9.1% (9 of 99 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Dawn-Blessed Pennant relevance 0.35 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.30 · 9.1% (9 of 99 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.28 · 12.1% (12 of 99 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.20 · 34.3% (34 of 99 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.20 · 35.4% (35 of 99 decks)
- Wizard's Staff relevance 0.27 · 8.1% (8 of 99 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.25 · 12.1% (12 of 99 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.30 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Glamdring, Foe-hammer // Gleam of Death relevance 0.25 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Obelisk of Urd relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.18 · 22.2% (22 of 99 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.22 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- The Magic Mirror relevance 0.22 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.17 · 14.1% (14 of 99 decks)
- Winter Moon relevance 0.20 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.16 · 13.1% (13 of 99 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.15 · 15.2% (15 of 99 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.16 · 11.1% (11 of 99 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.17 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Sword of the Squeak relevance 0.25 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.16 · 10.1% (10 of 99 decks)
- Super Suit relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.15 · 9.1% (9 of 99 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.16 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Illvoi Light Jammer relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.15 · 8.1% (8 of 99 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.15 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.12 · 16.2% (16 of 99 decks)
- Aether Vial relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.15 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.07 · 68.7% (68 of 99 decks)
- Goldvein Pick relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Deeproot Pilgrimage relevance 0.53 · 45.5% (45 of 99 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.41 · 66.7% (66 of 99 decks)
- Merrow Commerce relevance 0.54 · 38.4% (38 of 99 decks)
- Deeproot Waters relevance 0.51 · 25.3% (25 of 99 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.37 · 13.1% (13 of 99 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.36 · 12.1% (12 of 99 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.31 · 21.2% (21 of 99 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.34 · 12.1% (12 of 99 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.32 · 16.2% (16 of 99 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.35 · 8.1% (8 of 99 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.32 · 9.1% (9 of 99 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.28 · 14.1% (14 of 99 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.32 · 8.1% (8 of 99 decks)
- Frozen in Ice relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Levitation relevance 0.31 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- In Too Deep relevance 0.31 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.28 · 8.1% (8 of 99 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.22 · 13.1% (13 of 99 decks)
- Seal of Removal relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Spreading Seas relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Fresh Start relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.20 · 12.1% (12 of 99 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.21 · 9.1% (9 of 99 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.20 · 12.1% (12 of 99 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.14 · 40.4% (40 of 99 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.13 · 42.4% (42 of 99 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.20 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.19 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Super Intelligence relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.18 · 8.1% (8 of 99 decks)
- Lost in the Maze relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.13 · 34.3% (34 of 99 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Puppet Master relevance 0.25 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Aquatic Incursion relevance 0.25 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Secret Invasion relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Noggle the Mind relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Day of the Dragons relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Mystic Subdual relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.14 · 8.1% (8 of 99 decks)
- Invisibility relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Kitnap relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Military Intelligence relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.13 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
All instants (50)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.44 · 74.7% (74 of 99 decks)
- Transcendent Message relevance 0.47 · 55.6% (55 of 99 decks)
- Abjure relevance 0.36 · 41.4% (41 of 99 decks)
- Fated Infatuation relevance 0.40 · 18.2% (18 of 99 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.33 · 33.3% (33 of 99 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.21 · 76.8% (76 of 99 decks)
- Reenact the Crime relevance 0.39 · 16.2% (16 of 99 decks)
- Unexpected Assistance relevance 0.40 · 13.1% (13 of 99 decks)
- Wild Unraveling relevance 0.41 · 11.1% (11 of 99 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.22 · 68.7% (68 of 99 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.34 · 24.2% (24 of 99 decks)
- Teleport relevance 0.40 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.33 · 13.1% (13 of 99 decks)
- Brush Off relevance 0.36 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 0.33 · 10.1% (10 of 99 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.25 · 28.3% (28 of 99 decks)
- Redirect relevance 0.32 · 9.1% (9 of 99 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.23 · 32.3% (32 of 99 decks)
- Mission Briefing relevance 0.29 · 12.1% (12 of 99 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.24 · 27.3% (27 of 99 decks)
- We Say Thee Nay! relevance 0.34 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 0.32 · 8.1% (8 of 99 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 0.32 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.25 · 23.2% (23 of 99 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.20 · 45.5% (45 of 99 decks)
- Filter Out relevance 0.29 · 9.1% (9 of 99 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.28 · 10.1% (10 of 99 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.21 · 35.4% (35 of 99 decks)
- Commander's Insight relevance 0.30 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Reset relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.15 · 56.6% (56 of 99 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.21 · 22.2% (22 of 99 decks)
- Get Out relevance 0.28 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.21 · 18.2% (18 of 99 decks)
- Twist Reality relevance 0.28 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.19 · 25.3% (25 of 99 decks)
- Saw It Coming relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.24 · 10.1% (10 of 99 decks)
- Urza's Rebuff relevance 0.28 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.25 · 8.1% (8 of 99 decks)
- It'll Quench Ya! relevance 0.27 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.13 · 61.6% (61 of 99 decks)
- Meeting of Minds relevance 0.26 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.25 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.25 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 0.26 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.15 · 42.4% (42 of 99 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.17 · 34.3% (34 of 99 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 0.25 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.45 · 47.5% (47 of 99 decks)
- Secret of Bloodbending relevance 0.47 · 40.4% (40 of 99 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.39 · 48.5% (48 of 99 decks)
- Inundate relevance 0.41 · 31.3% (31 of 99 decks)
- Nanogene Conversion relevance 0.43 · 15.2% (15 of 99 decks)
- Invoke the Winds relevance 0.40 · 22.2% (22 of 99 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.34 · 30.3% (30 of 99 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.40 · 12.1% (12 of 99 decks)
- Tempted by the Oriq relevance 0.39 · 13.1% (13 of 99 decks)
- Wisdom of Ages relevance 0.33 · 21.2% (21 of 99 decks)
- Flood of Recollection relevance 0.34 · 15.2% (15 of 99 decks)
- Aquitect's Will relevance 0.30 · 17.2% (17 of 99 decks)
- Shared Discovery relevance 0.38 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Wanderwine Farewell relevance 0.38 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.30 · 13.1% (13 of 99 decks)
- Water Whip relevance 0.35 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.19 · 49.5% (49 of 99 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.17 · 55.6% (55 of 99 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.28 · 10.1% (10 of 99 decks)
- Eye of Nowhere relevance 0.32 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.27 · 10.1% (10 of 99 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.24 · 14.1% (14 of 99 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.22 · 16.2% (16 of 99 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Crashing Wave relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Turtles in Time relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.20 · 15.2% (15 of 99 decks)
- Advice from the Fae relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.21 · 11.1% (11 of 99 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.24 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Crashing Tide relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Winged Words relevance 0.24 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.20 · 12.1% (12 of 99 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Secrets of the Golden City relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Artful Dodge relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.20 · 8.1% (8 of 99 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (11 of 99 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.21 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Distortion Strike relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Atlantis Attacks relevance 0.27 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.18 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Sanity Grinding relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Recurring Insight relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Sleep relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.15 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.09 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Segovia // Caetus, Sea Tyrant of Segovia relevance 0.39 · 25.3% (25 of 99 decks)
All utility lands (45)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.31 · 14.1% (14 of 99 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.28 · 23.2% (23 of 99 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.22 · 25.3% (25 of 99 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.22 · 16.2% (16 of 99 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.18 · 26.3% (26 of 99 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.21 · 13.1% (13 of 99 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.14 · 51.5% (51 of 99 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.21 · 10.1% (10 of 99 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.20 · 12.1% (12 of 99 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.20 · 12.1% (12 of 99 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.18 · 16.2% (16 of 99 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.17 · 15.2% (15 of 99 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.13 · 32.3% (32 of 99 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.15 · 17.2% (17 of 99 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.16 · 13.1% (13 of 99 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.17 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.14 · 11.1% (11 of 99 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.15 · 8.1% (8 of 99 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.08 · 57.6% (57 of 99 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.13 · 10.1% (10 of 99 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.07 · 64.6% (64 of 99 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.15 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.14 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.08 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.07 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.07 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (19)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.41 · 55.6% (55 of 99 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.21 · 33.3% (33 of 99 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.19 · 12.1% (12 of 99 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.22 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.18 · 12.1% (12 of 99 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (4 of 99 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.17 · 10.1% (10 of 99 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.17 · 10.1% (10 of 99 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.15 · 11.1% (11 of 99 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.16 · 5.1% (5 of 99 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.16 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.17 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.17 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.11 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.07 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 94.9% (94 of 99 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Namor the Sub-Mariner, from 99 real Commander decks.