Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Daring Thief relevance 0.34 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.23 · 52.2% (12 of 23 decks)
- Spawnbroker relevance 0.31 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.25 · 39.1% (9 of 23 decks)
- Perplexing Chimera relevance 0.27 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Council of Advisors relevance 0.30 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Puca's Mischief relevance 0.28 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Djinn of Infinite Deceits relevance 0.27 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 0.22 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
- Noetic Scales relevance 0.27 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.19 · 47.8% (11 of 23 decks)
- Rishadan Footpad relevance 0.25 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 0.19 · 43.5% (10 of 23 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.23 · 21.7% (5 of 23 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 0.20 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
- Legerdemain relevance 0.23 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Ensnaring Bridge relevance 0.22 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Chill relevance 0.23 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 0.24 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.18 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.17 · 30.4% (7 of 23 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.18 · 21.7% (5 of 23 decks)
- Stronghold Biologist relevance 0.21 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Torpor Orb relevance 0.19 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.17 · 30.4% (7 of 23 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.17 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Stronghold Machinist relevance 0.21 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Piracy relevance 0.20 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.16 · 30.4% (7 of 23 decks)
- Naru Meha, Master Wizard relevance 0.18 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.18 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.15 · 30.4% (7 of 23 decks)
- Sift relevance 0.19 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Niblis of the Breath relevance 0.19 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Circuit Mender relevance 0.17 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Frozen Aether relevance 0.17 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Stroke of Genius relevance 0.16 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Glistener Seer relevance 0.18 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.17 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Meekstone relevance 0.17 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.15 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Torrential Gearhulk relevance 0.16 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.15 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Ingenious Mastery relevance 0.18 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.15 · 21.7% (5 of 23 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 0.16 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.14 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Ward of Bones relevance 0.18 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Compulsion relevance 0.18 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Puppeteer relevance 0.17 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
Card Stacks
17
Card Stacks
17Showing 1-2 of 17
Cards like Thousand-Year Elixir
17× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Thousand-Year Elixir 52%
- Aphetto Alchemist 35%
- Magewright's Stone 22%
- Jandor's Saddlebags 4%
- Puppet Strings 4%
Other options: Synod Artificer, Filigree Sages, Voltaic Construct
Cards like Trophy Mage
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards like Sol Ring
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 43%
- Mystic Remora 43%
Cards like Lightning Greaves
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other blue decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 39%
- Swiftfoot Boots 30%
Cards like Stroke of Genius
15× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
- Stroke of Genius 17%
- Mind Spring 13%
- Silver Scrutiny 9%
- Braingeyser 4%
Other options: Mathemagics
Cards like Kelpie Guide
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards like Fabricate
3.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 43%
- Scour for Scrap 13%
Cards like Gilded Drake
13× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
- Gilded Drake 35%
- Volatile Stormdrake 13%
Cards like Consecrated Sphinx
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards like Peregrine Drake
3.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Spawnbroker
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
- Spawnbroker 17%
- Vedalken Plotter 4%
Cards like Walking Ballista
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards like Shore Up
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Shore Up 22%
- Magic Damper 9%
Other options: Mizzium Skin, Dive Down, Glint, You See a Guard Approach, Octopus Form, Shell Shield, Chase Inspiration
Cards like Solemn Simulacrum
4.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Reshape
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
- Reshape 17%
- Transmute Artifact 4%
Cards like Archaeomancer
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards
- Archaeomancer 35%
- Mnemonic Wall 4%
Other options: Scholar of the Ages, Scrivener, Salvager of Secrets, Shipwreck Dowser
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Daring Thief relevance 0.34 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Spawnbroker relevance 0.31 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.25 · 39.1% (9 of 23 decks)
- Perplexing Chimera relevance 0.27 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Council of Advisors relevance 0.30 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Djinn of Infinite Deceits relevance 0.27 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 0.22 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.19 · 47.8% (11 of 23 decks)
- Rishadan Footpad relevance 0.25 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 0.19 · 43.5% (10 of 23 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 0.20 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
- Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 0.24 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.18 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.18 · 21.7% (5 of 23 decks)
- Stronghold Biologist relevance 0.21 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.17 · 30.4% (7 of 23 decks)
- Stronghold Machinist relevance 0.21 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.16 · 30.4% (7 of 23 decks)
- Naru Meha, Master Wizard relevance 0.18 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.18 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Niblis of the Breath relevance 0.19 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Circuit Mender relevance 0.17 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Glistener Seer relevance 0.18 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.17 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Torrential Gearhulk relevance 0.16 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.15 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.15 · 21.7% (5 of 23 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.14 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Puppeteer relevance 0.17 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Loyal Inventor relevance 0.16 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Ambassador Laquatus relevance 0.17 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.14 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Thieving Skydiver relevance 0.15 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Tidespout Tyrant relevance 0.15 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Plague Myr relevance 0.15 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Sea Spirit relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.13 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.14 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.12 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
- Transcendent Dragon relevance 0.16 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Pierce Strider relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Silent Arbiter relevance 0.14 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Grim Poppet relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.14 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Aether Adept relevance 0.15 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.14 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Pilgrim's Eye relevance 0.14 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.13 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Cerulean Wyvern relevance 0.16 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Hedron Crawler relevance 0.14 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All artifacts (50)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.23 · 52.2% (12 of 23 decks)
- Noetic Scales relevance 0.27 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.23 · 21.7% (5 of 23 decks)
- Ensnaring Bridge relevance 0.22 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.17 · 30.4% (7 of 23 decks)
- Torpor Orb relevance 0.19 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.17 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.15 · 30.4% (7 of 23 decks)
- Meekstone relevance 0.17 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.15 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Ward of Bones relevance 0.18 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.15 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.13 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.15 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Aether Vial relevance 0.16 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Crawlspace relevance 0.14 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 0.14 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.14 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.10 · 39.1% (9 of 23 decks)
- Ring of Valkas relevance 0.16 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Forsaken Monument relevance 0.12 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.13 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.10 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.11 · 21.7% (5 of 23 decks)
- Strider Harness relevance 0.14 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Jandor's Saddlebags relevance 0.14 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.11 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Isolation Cell relevance 0.13 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Portcullis relevance 0.13 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.12 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.09 · 39.1% (9 of 23 decks)
- Tsabo's Web relevance 0.13 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.12 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Avarice Totem relevance 0.13 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.11 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Chariot of Victory relevance 0.13 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.10 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Pendant of Prosperity relevance 0.12 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.11 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Puppet Strings relevance 0.12 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Portal of Sanctuary relevance 0.12 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Mindcrank relevance 0.11 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Erratic Portal relevance 0.11 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.08 · 30.4% (7 of 23 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.07 · 39.1% (9 of 23 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.09 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Weathered Runestone relevance 0.11 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.10 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.08 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Myr Turbine relevance 0.10 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
Enchantments
49
Enchantments
49 Showing 1-10 of 49
Page size
All enchantments (49)
- Puca's Mischief relevance 0.28 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Chill relevance 0.23 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Frozen Aether relevance 0.17 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Compulsion relevance 0.18 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Soothsaying relevance 0.17 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Pendrell Mists relevance 0.17 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 0.16 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.13 · 21.7% (5 of 23 decks)
- Thought Lash relevance 0.15 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.14 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.13 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Lost in Thought relevance 0.15 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.13 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.12 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.09 · 43.5% (10 of 23 decks)
- Psychic Venom relevance 0.13 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- High Seas relevance 0.13 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.08 · 43.5% (10 of 23 decks)
- Illusory Gains relevance 0.13 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Thassa's Ire relevance 0.12 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Shimmer relevance 0.12 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Land Equilibrium relevance 0.12 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Soul Barrier relevance 0.12 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.11 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Annex relevance 0.11 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Zur's Weirding relevance 0.11 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.07 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
- Mana Breach relevance 0.10 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.09 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Omen of the Sea relevance 0.09 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Arcane Laboratory relevance 0.09 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Overburden relevance 0.09 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.08 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Standstill relevance 0.09 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Monastery Siege relevance 0.09 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Observed Stasis relevance 0.09 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Well of Ideas relevance 0.09 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.08 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.08 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.08 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.08 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.08 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Court of Cunning relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.06 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.06 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Fraying Sanity relevance 0.06 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.04 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Stroke of Genius relevance 0.16 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Opportunity relevance 0.17 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.14 · 21.7% (5 of 23 decks)
- Mana Short relevance 0.16 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 0.14 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Disenchant relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.12 · 21.7% (5 of 23 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.13 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 0.13 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Champion's Victory relevance 0.15 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.12 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Leadership Vacuum relevance 0.13 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.13 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Forbid relevance 0.13 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.10 · 21.7% (5 of 23 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.12 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.10 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.10 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.10 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.11 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.10 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Turnabout relevance 0.11 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.09 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.10 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.09 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Dream's Grip relevance 0.10 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Aether Tradewinds relevance 0.11 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Curfew relevance 0.11 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.08 · 30.4% (7 of 23 decks)
- Toils of Night and Day relevance 0.11 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.08 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.07 · 43.5% (10 of 23 decks)
- Psychic Puppetry relevance 0.11 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.09 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Crypsis relevance 0.11 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.07 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.10 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Peel from Reality relevance 0.11 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.10 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.10 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Tolarian Winds relevance 0.09 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.08 · 21.7% (5 of 23 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.09 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- This Town Ain't Big Enough relevance 0.10 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.09 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Whoosh! relevance 0.10 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Miscalculation relevance 0.10 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.08 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Sunder relevance 0.10 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Tidal Bore relevance 0.10 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All sorceries (50)
- Legerdemain relevance 0.23 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Piracy relevance 0.20 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Sift relevance 0.19 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Ingenious Mastery relevance 0.18 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 0.16 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.15 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.11 · 43.5% (10 of 23 decks)
- Modify Memory relevance 0.15 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Silver Scrutiny relevance 0.14 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.12 · 21.7% (5 of 23 decks)
- Sakashima's Will relevance 0.13 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.12 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Mitotic Manipulation relevance 0.13 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.11 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.10 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.10 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.11 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.09 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Tidings relevance 0.12 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.10 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Cultural Exchange relevance 0.11 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.09 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Braingeyser relevance 0.10 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.09 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Shifting Grift relevance 0.09 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Acquire relevance 0.09 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Savor the Moment relevance 0.09 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Time Spiral relevance 0.08 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.08 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Baral's Expertise relevance 0.08 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.08 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.06 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Flow of Ideas relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Cut Your Losses relevance 0.06 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Tasha's Hideous Laughter relevance 0.06 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.06 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.06 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Traumatize relevance 0.06 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.05 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Fractured Sanity relevance 0.06 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.06 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Maddening Cacophony relevance 0.05 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.05 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.05 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.05 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.05 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
Planeswalkers
8
Planeswalkers
8 Showing 1-8 of 8
Page size
All planeswalkers (8)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.11 · 17.4% (4 of 23 decks)
- Jace, Architect of Thought relevance 0.09 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.08 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Jace, Memory Adept relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Jace, the Perfected Mind relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.05 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
Utility Lands
40
Utility Lands
40 Showing 1-10 of 40
Page size
All utility lands (40)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.14 · 47.8% (11 of 23 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.16 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.12 · 30.4% (7 of 23 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.12 · 30.4% (7 of 23 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.10 · 39.1% (9 of 23 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.13 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.10 · 30.4% (7 of 23 decks)
- Miren, the Moaning Well relevance 0.13 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.11 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.08 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.10 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.09 · 21.7% (5 of 23 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.10 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.08 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.09 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.05 · 52.2% (12 of 23 decks)
- Hall of the Bandit Lord relevance 0.09 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.08 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.08 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.08 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.07 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.08 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.08 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.08 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.05 · 47.8% (11 of 23 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.06 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.06 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.06 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.06 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.06 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.06 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.05 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.05 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.05 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.04 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.04 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.03 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
Lands
17
Lands
17 Showing 1-10 of 17
Page size
All lands (17)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.10 · 26.1% (6 of 23 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.10 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.12 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Lotus Vale relevance 0.11 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.09 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.08 · 13.0% (3 of 23 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.09 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.09 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.08 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.07 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.06 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.05 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.04 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 73.9% (17 of 23 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Lady Sun, from 23 real Commander decks.