Cards like Elvish Mystic
2.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
92% of decks run one or more
vs. 48% of other Selesnya decks
85% of decks run two or more
vs. 31% of other Selesnya decks
3.3 per deck on average
vs. 1.1 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Elvish Mystic 83%
- Llanowar Elves 83%
- Fyndhorn Elves 75%
- Avacyn's Pilgrim 74%
- Boreal Druid 18%
- Golden Hind 1%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Steward of Valeron, Llanowar Tribe, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Quirion Ranger
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
88% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
53% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Quirion Ranger 78%
- Arbor Elf 47%
- Scryb Ranger 39%
Cards like Vitalize
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Cards like Chord of Calling
12× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Eladamri's Call
6.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Selesnya decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Eladamri's Call 58%
- Worldly Tutor 47%
- Sylvan Tutor 24%
Cards like Instill Energy
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Instill Energy 47%
- Nature's Chosen 36%
Cards like Grand Abolisher
14× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Grand Abolisher 52%
- Voice of Victory 37%
Cards like High Stride
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- High Stride 22%
- Arachnoid Adaptation 21%
- Leaping Ambush 20%
- Sudden Spinnerets 19%
- Ornamental Courage 17%
- Vines of the Recluse 12%
- Pillar Launch 12%
- Witch's Web 4%
- Aim High 3%
- Gift of Growth 3%
- Tethermage's Advantage 2%
- Steady Aim 2%
- Savage Surge 1%
- Gerrard's Command 1%
Other options: Spidery Grasp
Cards like Stony Strength
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Stony Strength 19%
- Burst of Strength 17%
Other options: Dragonscale Boon, Tawnos's Tinkering, Soldier On
Cards like Chrome Mox
12× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 30%
- Mox Diamond 16%
Cards like Priest of Titania
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Silence
16× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Silence 40%
- Orim's Chant 17%
Cards like Seedborn Muse
18× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Congregation at Dawn
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Thousand-Year Elixir
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Smothering Tithe
16× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Selesnya decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
6.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 73% of other Selesnya decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.75 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Squall Line
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Elvish Archdruid
5.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Imperious Perfect, Canopy Tactician, Elvish Clancaller, Galadhrim Brigade
Cards like Noxious Revival
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Survival of the Fittest
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Scrawling Crawler
18× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 28% of other Selesnya decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 43%
- Swiftfoot Boots 24%
Cards like Village Bell-Ringer
3.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Sparring Mummy, Sunstrike Legionnaire
Cards like Beast Whisperer
2.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Vexing Bauble
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.17 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Vexing Bauble 16%
- Void Mirror 1%
All top picks (50)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.34 · 68.5% (61 of 89 decks)
- Mobilize relevance 0.43 · 43.8% (39 of 89 decks)
- To Arms! relevance 0.40 · 48.3% (43 of 89 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.45 · 37.1% (33 of 89 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.35 · 58.4% (52 of 89 decks)
- Pili-Pala relevance 0.45 · 30.3% (27 of 89 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.39 · 42.7% (38 of 89 decks)
- Marvin, Murderous Mimic relevance 0.32 · 58.4% (52 of 89 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.32 · 58.4% (52 of 89 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.29 · 65.2% (58 of 89 decks)
- Instill Energy relevance 0.34 · 47.2% (42 of 89 decks)
- Arachnoid Adaptation relevance 0.44 · 21.3% (19 of 89 decks)
- High Stride relevance 0.43 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Sudden Spinnerets relevance 0.44 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.40 · 27.0% (24 of 89 decks)
- Leaping Ambush relevance 0.43 · 20.2% (18 of 89 decks)
- Stony Strength relevance 0.43 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Orochi Leafcaller relevance 0.41 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Burst of Strength relevance 0.43 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.23 · 77.5% (69 of 89 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.25 · 71.9% (64 of 89 decks)
- Congregation at Dawn relevance 0.35 · 36.0% (32 of 89 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.37 · 30.3% (27 of 89 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.42 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Ornamental Courage relevance 0.42 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.28 · 55.1% (49 of 89 decks)
- Squall Line relevance 0.41 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Angel's Grace relevance 0.33 · 37.1% (33 of 89 decks)
- Mirror Entity relevance 0.36 · 28.1% (25 of 89 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.41 · 14.6% (13 of 89 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.30 · 43.8% (39 of 89 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.38 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 0.41 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.28 · 47.2% (42 of 89 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.38 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Stoneforge Mystic relevance 0.36 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.36 · 21.3% (19 of 89 decks)
- Vines of the Recluse relevance 0.40 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.36 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Pillar Launch relevance 0.39 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.30 · 33.7% (30 of 89 decks)
- Drumbellower relevance 0.36 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.37 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.39 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.28 · 39.3% (35 of 89 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.24 · 50.6% (45 of 89 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.35 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.34 · 14.6% (13 of 89 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.34 · 14.6% (13 of 89 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.27 · 37.1% (33 of 89 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Pili-Pala relevance 0.45 · 30.3% (27 of 89 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.39 · 42.7% (38 of 89 decks)
- Marvin, Murderous Mimic relevance 0.32 · 58.4% (52 of 89 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.32 · 58.4% (52 of 89 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.29 · 65.2% (58 of 89 decks)
- Orochi Leafcaller relevance 0.41 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.23 · 77.5% (69 of 89 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.37 · 30.3% (27 of 89 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.42 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.28 · 55.1% (49 of 89 decks)
- Mirror Entity relevance 0.36 · 28.1% (25 of 89 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.38 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.38 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Stoneforge Mystic relevance 0.36 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.36 · 21.3% (19 of 89 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.30 · 33.7% (30 of 89 decks)
- Drumbellower relevance 0.36 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.28 · 39.3% (35 of 89 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.27 · 37.1% (33 of 89 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.34 · 13.5% (12 of 89 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.32 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Trelasarra, Moon Dancer relevance 0.32 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Shang-Chi, Master of Kung Fu relevance 0.28 · 24.7% (22 of 89 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.17 · 75.3% (67 of 89 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.29 · 20.2% (18 of 89 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.34 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Mana relevance 0.34 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Village Bell-Ringer relevance 0.22 · 42.7% (38 of 89 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.25 · 29.2% (26 of 89 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.33 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.14 · 83.1% (74 of 89 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.33 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.19 · 47.2% (42 of 89 decks)
- Captain Sisay relevance 0.30 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.26 · 14.6% (13 of 89 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.31 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.17 · 53.9% (48 of 89 decks)
- Elvish Spirit Guide relevance 0.19 · 44.9% (40 of 89 decks)
- Endurance relevance 0.21 · 32.6% (29 of 89 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.31 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Tataru Taru relevance 0.25 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Aeve, Progenitor Ooze relevance 0.32 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.24 · 18.0% (16 of 89 decks)
- Jennifer Walters // The Sensational She-Hulk relevance 0.24 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.29 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Windborn Muse relevance 0.30 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Skyshroud Ranger relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.25 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.27 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.20 · 31.5% (28 of 89 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.34 · 68.5% (61 of 89 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.25 · 71.9% (64 of 89 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.41 · 14.6% (13 of 89 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.36 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.37 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.39 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.34 · 14.6% (13 of 89 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.34 · 14.6% (13 of 89 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.23 · 42.7% (38 of 89 decks)
- Jeweled Amulet relevance 0.36 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Guac & Marshmallow Pizza relevance 0.32 · 11.2% (10 of 89 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.29 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Uba Mask relevance 0.35 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.30 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.25 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Elixir of Immortality relevance 0.31 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.27 · 13.5% (12 of 89 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.21 · 29.2% (26 of 89 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.21 · 30.3% (27 of 89 decks)
- Conqueror's Flail relevance 0.29 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.19 · 38.2% (34 of 89 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.28 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.22 · 18.0% (16 of 89 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.22 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.23 · 11.2% (10 of 89 decks)
- Well of Lost Dreams relevance 0.24 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.24 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.19 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Puppet Strings relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.20 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Luxior, Giada's Gift relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.21 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.18 · 11.2% (10 of 89 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- The Seriema relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.12 · 34.8% (31 of 89 decks)
- Fountainport Bell relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Chromatic Sphere relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Guild Globe relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Sungrass Egg relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Apple of Eden, Isu Relic relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Lodestone Bauble relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Conjurer's Bauble relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Welding Jar relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Sunbeam Spellbomb relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Instill Energy relevance 0.34 · 47.2% (42 of 89 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.35 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.23 · 50.6% (45 of 89 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.22 · 51.7% (46 of 89 decks)
- Nature's Chosen relevance 0.26 · 36.0% (32 of 89 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.32 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.29 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Gleaming Splendor relevance 0.25 · 14.6% (13 of 89 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.18 · 39.3% (35 of 89 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.16 · 47.2% (42 of 89 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.21 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Dazzling Theater // Prop Room relevance 0.24 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Recycle relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Airtight Alibi relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Smuggler's Share relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.20 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Test of Endurance relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Touch the Spirit Realm relevance 0.20 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Trouble in Pairs relevance 0.19 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.18 · 11.2% (10 of 89 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- City of Solitude relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Swift Reconfiguration relevance 0.17 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.13 · 25.8% (23 of 89 decks)
- Eladamri's Vineyard relevance 0.22 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.15 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Court of Ardenvale relevance 0.22 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Deafening Silence relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Tenuous Truce relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Court of Grace relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Rule of Law relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Mirri's Guile relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Solitary Confinement relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Darksteel Mutation relevance 0.13 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Aluren relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.12 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Aura of Silence relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Earthcraft relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.09 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.12 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
All instants (50)
- To Arms! relevance 0.40 · 48.3% (43 of 89 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.45 · 37.1% (33 of 89 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.35 · 58.4% (52 of 89 decks)
- Arachnoid Adaptation relevance 0.44 · 21.3% (19 of 89 decks)
- High Stride relevance 0.43 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Sudden Spinnerets relevance 0.44 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.40 · 27.0% (24 of 89 decks)
- Leaping Ambush relevance 0.43 · 20.2% (18 of 89 decks)
- Stony Strength relevance 0.43 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Burst of Strength relevance 0.43 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Congregation at Dawn relevance 0.35 · 36.0% (32 of 89 decks)
- Ornamental Courage relevance 0.42 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Squall Line relevance 0.41 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Angel's Grace relevance 0.33 · 37.1% (33 of 89 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.30 · 43.8% (39 of 89 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.28 · 47.2% (42 of 89 decks)
- Vines of the Recluse relevance 0.40 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Pillar Launch relevance 0.39 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.24 · 50.6% (45 of 89 decks)
- Seedtime relevance 0.36 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- Djeru's Resolve relevance 0.37 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Call to Glory relevance 0.38 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.27 · 30.3% (27 of 89 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.29 · 20.2% (18 of 89 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.30 · 14.6% (13 of 89 decks)
- Touch of Vitae relevance 0.35 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Rally of Wings relevance 0.34 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Roar of the Kha relevance 0.33 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.19 · 50.6% (45 of 89 decks)
- Witch's Web relevance 0.33 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Boon of Boseiju relevance 0.33 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.31 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Rustler Rampage relevance 0.31 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Dawn Charm relevance 0.30 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Orim's Chant relevance 0.25 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Reprieve relevance 0.24 · 18.0% (16 of 89 decks)
- Acrobatic Leap relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.22 · 25.8% (23 of 89 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.22 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.20 · 29.2% (26 of 89 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.27 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.17 · 40.4% (36 of 89 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.18 · 31.5% (28 of 89 decks)
- Aim High relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Gift of Growth relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.14 · 51.7% (46 of 89 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.19 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Final Showdown relevance 0.26 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.22 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Mobilize relevance 0.43 · 43.8% (39 of 89 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 0.41 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.30 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Approach of the Second Sun relevance 0.32 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Steelshaper's Gift relevance 0.34 · 11.2% (10 of 89 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.31 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Land Grant relevance 0.33 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Council's Judgment relevance 0.31 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.27 · 11.2% (10 of 89 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Open the Armory relevance 0.24 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.16 · 50.6% (45 of 89 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.22 · 13.5% (12 of 89 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.18 · 30.3% (27 of 89 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.17 · 40.4% (36 of 89 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.22 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Cut a Deal relevance 0.26 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.26 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.26 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.14 · 48.3% (43 of 89 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.23 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Secret Rendezvous relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Promise of Loyalty relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Tempt with Bunnies relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.16 · 14.6% (13 of 89 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.17 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.18 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.19 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.17 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Nostalgic Dreams relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Selvala's Charge relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Revive relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Seasons Past relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Weird Harvest relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Split Up relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Selvala's Stampede relevance 0.22 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Chatterstorm relevance 0.22 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.15 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Search for Glory relevance 0.21 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Green Sun's Twilight relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.22 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.39 · 69.7% (62 of 89 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.32 · 30.3% (27 of 89 decks)
- Razorgrass Ambush // Razorgrass Field relevance 0.33 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Emeria's Call // Emeria, Shattered Skyclave relevance 0.35 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.26 · 27.0% (24 of 89 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.30 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.25 · 27.0% (24 of 89 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.22 · 31.5% (28 of 89 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.24 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.18 · 40.4% (36 of 89 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.22 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.19 · 24.7% (22 of 89 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.20 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.21 · 14.6% (13 of 89 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.20 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Kabira Takedown // Kabira Plateau relevance 0.24 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Ondu Inversion // Ondu Skyruins relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.18 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.14 · 40.4% (36 of 89 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.12 · 56.2% (50 of 89 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.20 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.20 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.19 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.12 · 38.2% (34 of 89 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.16 · 11.2% (10 of 89 decks)
- Throne of the High City relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.11 · 40.4% (36 of 89 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.22 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Makindi Stampede // Makindi Mesas relevance 0.21 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Skyclave Cleric // Skyclave Basilica relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Mirrex relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.13 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
All lands (50)
- Remote Farm relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.19 · 30.3% (27 of 89 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.20 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.18 · 27.0% (24 of 89 decks)
- Tarnished Citadel relevance 0.24 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.18 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.18 · 20.2% (18 of 89 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.14 · 41.6% (37 of 89 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.15 · 32.6% (29 of 89 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.16 · 27.0% (24 of 89 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.16 · 27.0% (24 of 89 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.19 · 11.2% (10 of 89 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.16 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.15 · 25.8% (23 of 89 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.15 · 28.1% (25 of 89 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.15 · 27.0% (24 of 89 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.18 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.12 · 41.6% (37 of 89 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.20 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.15 · 14.6% (13 of 89 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.18 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.14 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.12 · 31.5% (28 of 89 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.14 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.14 · 13.5% (12 of 89 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.14 · 14.6% (13 of 89 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.15 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.07 · 74.2% (66 of 89 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.22 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.07 · 69.7% (62 of 89 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.14 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.07 · 59.6% (53 of 89 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.09 · 40.4% (36 of 89 decks)
- Grasslands relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Gathering Place relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.08 · 42.7% (38 of 89 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Multiversal Passage relevance 0.16 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Flagstones of Trokair relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.14 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.04 · 79.8% (71 of 89 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.12 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.10 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.02 · 93.3% (83 of 89 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Selvala, Explorer Returned, from 89 real Commander decks.