Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
All top picks (50)
- Benevolent Hydra relevance 0.64 · 33.2% (62 of 187 decks)
- Mer-Ek Nightblade relevance 0.60 · 32.6% (61 of 187 decks)
- Elite Scaleguard relevance 0.62 · 28.3% (53 of 187 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.46 · 56.7% (106 of 187 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.49 · 49.7% (93 of 187 decks)
- Council's Judgment relevance 0.63 · 23.5% (44 of 187 decks)
- Abigale, Poet Laureate // Heroic Stanza relevance 0.62 · 23.0% (43 of 187 decks)
- Orzhov Advokist relevance 0.62 · 21.4% (40 of 187 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.44 · 53.5% (100 of 187 decks)
- Together Forever relevance 0.53 · 35.8% (67 of 187 decks)
- Ivorytusk Fortress relevance 0.53 · 35.3% (66 of 187 decks)
- Ainok Bond-Kin relevance 0.52 · 35.3% (66 of 187 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.43 · 52.9% (99 of 187 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.36 · 69.5% (130 of 187 decks)
- Longshot Squad relevance 0.60 · 20.3% (38 of 187 decks)
- Enduring Scalelord relevance 0.58 · 23.0% (43 of 187 decks)
- Hangarback Walker relevance 0.55 · 26.7% (50 of 187 decks)
- Nils, Discipline Enforcer relevance 0.61 · 16.6% (31 of 187 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.44 · 46.5% (87 of 187 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.38 · 59.9% (112 of 187 decks)
- Retribution of the Ancients relevance 0.50 · 31.0% (58 of 187 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 0.50 · 31.0% (58 of 187 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.42 · 46.5% (87 of 187 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.41 · 49.2% (92 of 187 decks)
- Abzan Battle Priest relevance 0.48 · 33.2% (62 of 187 decks)
- Citadel Siege relevance 0.56 · 18.2% (34 of 187 decks)
- Battlefront Krushok relevance 0.59 · 13.4% (25 of 187 decks)
- Anafenza, the Foremost relevance 0.52 · 24.1% (45 of 187 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.45 · 37.4% (70 of 187 decks)
- Duelist's Heritage relevance 0.52 · 23.0% (43 of 187 decks)
- Hagra Constrictor relevance 0.53 · 20.3% (38 of 187 decks)
- Spike Feeder relevance 0.48 · 29.9% (56 of 187 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.39 · 47.1% (88 of 187 decks)
- Wedding Ring relevance 0.53 · 15.0% (28 of 187 decks)
- Cut a Deal relevance 0.52 · 18.2% (34 of 187 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.36 · 51.9% (97 of 187 decks)
- Otherworld Atlas relevance 0.61 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Pest Control relevance 0.55 · 11.8% (22 of 187 decks)
- Dragonscale General relevance 0.55 · 11.8% (22 of 187 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.48 · 23.0% (43 of 187 decks)
- Pendant of Prosperity relevance 0.61 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 0.39 · 43.3% (81 of 187 decks)
- Herald of Anafenza relevance 0.56 · 10.7% (20 of 187 decks)
- Archaeomancer's Map relevance 0.52 · 13.4% (25 of 187 decks)
- Haliya, Ascendant Cadet relevance 0.49 · 18.2% (34 of 187 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.44 · 27.8% (52 of 187 decks)
- Dromoka's Command relevance 0.49 · 16.0% (30 of 187 decks)
- Hopeful Initiate relevance 0.48 · 17.6% (33 of 187 decks)
- Breena, the Demagogue relevance 0.43 · 28.3% (53 of 187 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.46 · 19.8% (37 of 187 decks)
Card Stacks
22
Card Stacks
22Showing 1-2 of 22
Cards like Hardened Scales
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Abzan decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Beast Within
5.6× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Abzan decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Abzan decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Beast Within 47%
- Generous Gift 35%
Cards like Kami of Whispered Hopes
14× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Abzan decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Kami of Whispered Hopes 48%
- Gyre Sage 28%
- Incubation Druid 25%
Cards like Talisman of Resilience
3.9× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Abzan decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Abzan decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Enduring Scalelord
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Other options: Steelburr Champion, Medusa, Inhuman Queen
Cards like Abzan Battle Priest
16× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Tuskguard Captain
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Other options: Drix Fatemaker, Baloth Pup, Trollbred Guardian
Cards like Cursed Wombat
16× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Ozolith, the Shattered Spire
13× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Cut a Deal
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Cut a Deal 18%
- Secret Rendezvous 6%
Cards like Inspiring Call
5.9× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Abzan decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Avacyn's Pilgrim
1.4× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Abzan decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Abzan decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.37 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Cultivate
1.1× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other Abzan decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 24% of other Abzan decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.83 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Cultivate 25%
- Rampant Growth 19%
- Kodama's Reach 17%
- Map the Wastes 11%
- Explosive Vegetation 3%
- Migration Path 2%
- Grow from the Ashes 1%
- Search for Tomorrow 1%
- Shared Roots 1%
- Roamer's Routine 1%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Untamed Wilds, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Spike Feeder
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Dusk Legion Duelist
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Mikaeus, the Lunarch
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Other options: Hungering Hydra, Capricopian, Feral Hydra, Contortionist Troupe
Cards like Fertilid
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Benevolent Hydra
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Other options: Primordial Hydra, Kinetic Ooze, Voracious Hydra
Cards like Terrasymbiosis
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Evolution Witness
2.3× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Abzan decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Longshot Squad
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All creatures (50)
- Benevolent Hydra relevance 0.64 · 33.2% (62 of 187 decks)
- Mer-Ek Nightblade relevance 0.60 · 32.6% (61 of 187 decks)
- Elite Scaleguard relevance 0.62 · 28.3% (53 of 187 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.46 · 56.7% (106 of 187 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.49 · 49.7% (93 of 187 decks)
- Abigale, Poet Laureate // Heroic Stanza relevance 0.62 · 23.0% (43 of 187 decks)
- Orzhov Advokist relevance 0.62 · 21.4% (40 of 187 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.44 · 53.5% (100 of 187 decks)
- Ivorytusk Fortress relevance 0.53 · 35.3% (66 of 187 decks)
- Ainok Bond-Kin relevance 0.52 · 35.3% (66 of 187 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.43 · 52.9% (99 of 187 decks)
- Longshot Squad relevance 0.60 · 20.3% (38 of 187 decks)
- Enduring Scalelord relevance 0.58 · 23.0% (43 of 187 decks)
- Hangarback Walker relevance 0.55 · 26.7% (50 of 187 decks)
- Nils, Discipline Enforcer relevance 0.61 · 16.6% (31 of 187 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 0.50 · 31.0% (58 of 187 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.42 · 46.5% (87 of 187 decks)
- Abzan Battle Priest relevance 0.48 · 33.2% (62 of 187 decks)
- Battlefront Krushok relevance 0.59 · 13.4% (25 of 187 decks)
- Anafenza, the Foremost relevance 0.52 · 24.1% (45 of 187 decks)
- Hagra Constrictor relevance 0.53 · 20.3% (38 of 187 decks)
- Spike Feeder relevance 0.48 · 29.9% (56 of 187 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.39 · 47.1% (88 of 187 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.36 · 51.9% (97 of 187 decks)
- Dragonscale General relevance 0.55 · 11.8% (22 of 187 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.48 · 23.0% (43 of 187 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 0.39 · 43.3% (81 of 187 decks)
- Herald of Anafenza relevance 0.56 · 10.7% (20 of 187 decks)
- Haliya, Ascendant Cadet relevance 0.49 · 18.2% (34 of 187 decks)
- Hopeful Initiate relevance 0.48 · 17.6% (33 of 187 decks)
- Breena, the Demagogue relevance 0.43 · 28.3% (53 of 187 decks)
- Dusk Legion Duelist relevance 0.45 · 22.5% (42 of 187 decks)
- High Sentinels of Arashin relevance 0.53 · 10.2% (19 of 187 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.42 · 28.3% (53 of 187 decks)
- Anafenza, Kin-Tree Spirit relevance 0.45 · 19.8% (37 of 187 decks)
- Cursed Wombat relevance 0.46 · 17.6% (33 of 187 decks)
- Mikaeus, the Lunarch relevance 0.42 · 24.1% (45 of 187 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.43 · 18.7% (35 of 187 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.32 · 48.1% (90 of 187 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 0.37 · 29.9% (56 of 187 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.42 · 16.0% (30 of 187 decks)
- Shaile, Dean of Radiance // Embrose, Dean of Shadow relevance 0.47 · 10.2% (19 of 187 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.41 · 16.0% (30 of 187 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.33 · 35.8% (67 of 187 decks)
- Unforgiving One relevance 0.48 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Botanical Brawler relevance 0.43 · 12.8% (24 of 187 decks)
- Arcus Acolyte relevance 0.46 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.35 · 25.1% (47 of 187 decks)
- Juniper Order Ranger relevance 0.42 · 11.8% (22 of 187 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.38 · 13.9% (26 of 187 decks)
Artifacts
35
Artifacts
35 Showing 1-10 of 35
All artifacts (35)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.44 · 46.5% (87 of 187 decks)
- Wedding Ring relevance 0.53 · 15.0% (28 of 187 decks)
- Otherworld Atlas relevance 0.61 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Pendant of Prosperity relevance 0.61 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Archaeomancer's Map relevance 0.52 · 13.4% (25 of 187 decks)
- Abzan Banner relevance 0.40 · 13.4% (25 of 187 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.29 · 34.2% (64 of 187 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.28 · 31.0% (58 of 187 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.32 · 20.3% (38 of 187 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.38 · 8.6% (16 of 187 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.41 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Talisman of Resilience relevance 0.26 · 35.3% (66 of 187 decks)
- Orzhov Signet relevance 0.26 · 34.2% (64 of 187 decks)
- Talisman of Hierarchy relevance 0.26 · 30.5% (57 of 187 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.30 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.38 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.25 · 16.6% (31 of 187 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.31 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Abzan Monument relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Dromoka Monument relevance 0.33 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Well of Lost Dreams relevance 0.20 · 10.2% (19 of 187 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.21 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Pithing Needle relevance 0.32 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Orzhov Locket relevance 0.29 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Collector's Cage relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.17 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.17 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Elixir of Immortality relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.13 · 9.1% (17 of 187 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.06 · 69.5% (130 of 187 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 68.4% (128 of 187 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.08 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All enchantments (50)
- Together Forever relevance 0.53 · 35.8% (67 of 187 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.36 · 69.5% (130 of 187 decks)
- Retribution of the Ancients relevance 0.50 · 31.0% (58 of 187 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.41 · 49.2% (92 of 187 decks)
- Citadel Siege relevance 0.56 · 18.2% (34 of 187 decks)
- Duelist's Heritage relevance 0.52 · 23.0% (43 of 187 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.44 · 27.8% (52 of 187 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.37 · 39.0% (73 of 187 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.41 · 18.2% (34 of 187 decks)
- Hollowmurk Siege relevance 0.35 · 28.9% (54 of 187 decks)
- Abzan Ascendancy relevance 0.36 · 25.7% (48 of 187 decks)
- Seal of Primordium relevance 0.37 · 19.3% (36 of 187 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.36 · 18.2% (34 of 187 decks)
- Smuggler's Share relevance 0.41 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- High Score relevance 0.42 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.27 · 35.8% (67 of 187 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.39 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Death's Presence relevance 0.39 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.31 · 18.2% (34 of 187 decks)
- Leader's Talent relevance 0.39 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.37 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.30 · 16.6% (31 of 187 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.38 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.31 · 11.8% (22 of 187 decks)
- Sigarda's Summons relevance 0.35 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Barrensteppe Siege relevance 0.29 · 10.2% (19 of 187 decks)
- Gleam of Authority relevance 0.38 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.32 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.32 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Evolutionary Escalation relevance 0.39 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.29 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 0.29 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Vraska Joins Up relevance 0.27 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.27 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.24 · 11.2% (21 of 187 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.23 · 12.3% (23 of 187 decks)
- Palace Siege relevance 0.34 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.21 · 13.9% (26 of 187 decks)
- Virtue of Loyalty // Ardenvale Fealty relevance 0.29 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Trouble in Pairs relevance 0.25 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Test of Endurance relevance 0.24 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Echoes of the Kin Tree relevance 0.36 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Durable Handicraft relevance 0.35 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.19 · 13.4% (25 of 187 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.31 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Solid Ground relevance 0.30 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Laid to Rest relevance 0.29 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Frontier Siege relevance 0.28 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All instants (50)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.38 · 59.9% (112 of 187 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.45 · 37.4% (70 of 187 decks)
- Dromoka's Command relevance 0.49 · 16.0% (30 of 187 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 0.45 · 10.2% (19 of 187 decks)
- Feat of Resistance relevance 0.47 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.34 · 24.1% (45 of 187 decks)
- Utter End relevance 0.38 · 13.4% (25 of 187 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.35 · 16.0% (30 of 187 decks)
- Abzan Charm relevance 0.29 · 27.3% (51 of 187 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.26 · 34.8% (65 of 187 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.37 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Scale Blessing relevance 0.43 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Gift relevance 0.43 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Fracture relevance 0.33 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.21 · 46.5% (87 of 187 decks)
- Oblivion's Hunger relevance 0.40 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Pledge of Unity relevance 0.37 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Abzan Advantage relevance 0.40 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Dragonscale Boon relevance 0.41 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Ready // Willing relevance 0.31 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.30 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.24 · 15.0% (28 of 187 decks)
- Solidarity of Heroes relevance 0.34 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Duty Beyond Death relevance 0.26 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Valorous Stance relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Kin-Tree Severance relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.15 · 42.2% (79 of 187 decks)
- Channel Harm relevance 0.37 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Dire Tactics relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Mythos of Nethroi relevance 0.20 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Harsh Sustenance relevance 0.28 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Anguished Unmaking relevance 0.11 · 46.0% (86 of 187 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Mortify relevance 0.16 · 10.2% (19 of 187 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.18 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Despark relevance 0.16 · 11.2% (21 of 187 decks)
- Cauldron Haze relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Atomize relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Assassin's Trophy relevance 0.12 · 22.5% (42 of 187 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.09 · 44.4% (83 of 187 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.15 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Deathsprout relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Tear Asunder relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.16 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Nasty End relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Golgari Charm relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.14 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All sorceries (50)
- Council's Judgment relevance 0.63 · 23.5% (44 of 187 decks)
- Cut a Deal relevance 0.52 · 18.2% (34 of 187 decks)
- Pest Control relevance 0.55 · 11.8% (22 of 187 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.46 · 19.8% (37 of 187 decks)
- Map the Wastes relevance 0.51 · 10.7% (20 of 187 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.42 · 24.6% (46 of 187 decks)
- Vindicate relevance 0.39 · 21.4% (40 of 187 decks)
- Promise of Loyalty relevance 0.43 · 10.2% (19 of 187 decks)
- Incremental Growth relevance 0.47 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.36 · 20.9% (39 of 187 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.43 · 8.6% (16 of 187 decks)
- Basri's Solidarity relevance 0.45 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Duneblast relevance 0.35 · 15.0% (28 of 187 decks)
- Secret Rendezvous relevance 0.39 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 0.36 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.31 · 10.2% (19 of 187 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.30 · 10.2% (19 of 187 decks)
- Collective Effort relevance 0.36 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Cached Defenses relevance 0.41 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.28 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Read the Bones relevance 0.27 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.23 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.15 · 41.2% (77 of 187 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.24 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Hunt the Weak relevance 0.35 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Increasing Savagery relevance 0.34 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Perennation relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.17 · 16.6% (31 of 187 decks)
- Pull from the Grave relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.22 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Biogenic Upgrade relevance 0.30 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Eerie Ultimatum relevance 0.15 · 17.1% (32 of 187 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.14 · 19.3% (36 of 187 decks)
- Sign in Blood relevance 0.21 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Courage in Crisis relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.22 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.14 · 13.4% (25 of 187 decks)
- Synchronized Charge relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Kin-Tree Invocation relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.11 · 24.6% (46 of 187 decks)
- Time of Need relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Painful Truths relevance 0.18 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.12 · 10.7% (20 of 187 decks)
- Decorum Dissertation relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
Planeswalkers
6
Planeswalkers
6 Showing 1-6 of 6
All planeswalkers (6)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.43 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Ajani, Mentor of Heroes relevance 0.30 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Basri Ket relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.26 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Ajani Steadfast relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Professor Dellian Fel relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
Utility Lands
38
Utility Lands
38 Showing 1-10 of 38
All utility lands (38)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.48 · 32.1% (60 of 187 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.35 · 52.4% (98 of 187 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.42 · 15.0% (28 of 187 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.36 · 23.5% (44 of 187 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.41 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.28 · 25.1% (47 of 187 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.35 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.27 · 17.6% (33 of 187 decks)
- Vault of the Archangel relevance 0.24 · 28.3% (53 of 187 decks)
- Revitalizing Repast // Old-Growth Grove relevance 0.21 · 12.8% (24 of 187 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.21 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Deceptive Landscape relevance 0.16 · 21.9% (41 of 187 decks)
- Nurturing Peatland relevance 0.20 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Bretagard Stronghold relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.16 · 15.0% (28 of 187 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.13 · 36.4% (68 of 187 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.18 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.16 · 12.8% (24 of 187 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.17 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Temple of Silence relevance 0.16 · 11.8% (22 of 187 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.16 · 11.8% (22 of 187 decks)
- Indatha Triome relevance 0.12 · 36.4% (68 of 187 decks)
- Great Arashin City relevance 0.22 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Temple of Malady relevance 0.15 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.13 · 12.8% (24 of 187 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Stirring Wildwood relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.14 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.15 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Grim Backwoods relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.10 · 11.8% (22 of 187 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.12 · 5.3% (10 of 187 decks)
- Barren Moor relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.11 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Shadowy Backstreet relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Graypelt Refuge relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.09 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
Lands
50
Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All lands (50)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.24 · 26.2% (49 of 187 decks)
- Deathcap Glade relevance 0.21 · 38.5% (72 of 187 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.25 · 17.6% (33 of 187 decks)
- Shattered Sanctum relevance 0.21 · 32.1% (60 of 187 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.24 · 14.4% (27 of 187 decks)
- Murmuring Bosk relevance 0.19 · 33.2% (62 of 187 decks)
- Caves of Koilos relevance 0.16 · 47.1% (88 of 187 decks)
- Blooming Marsh relevance 0.25 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.16 · 42.2% (79 of 187 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (14 of 187 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.16 · 35.8% (67 of 187 decks)
- Orzhov Guildgate relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (9 of 187 decks)
- Undergrowth Stadium relevance 0.15 · 41.2% (77 of 187 decks)
- Llanowar Wastes relevance 0.15 · 44.9% (84 of 187 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.14 · 49.2% (92 of 187 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.20 · 15.5% (29 of 187 decks)
- Scoured Barrens relevance 0.19 · 15.5% (29 of 187 decks)
- Thriving Moor relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.22 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (8 of 187 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.19 · 11.2% (21 of 187 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.14 · 32.1% (60 of 187 decks)
- Orzhov Basilica relevance 0.19 · 9.6% (18 of 187 decks)
- Fetid Heath relevance 0.20 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Twilight Mire relevance 0.16 · 15.0% (28 of 187 decks)
- Vernal Fen relevance 0.19 · 7.0% (13 of 187 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.10 · 59.4% (111 of 187 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.18 · 9.1% (17 of 187 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.19 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Sandsteppe Citadel relevance 0.09 · 64.7% (121 of 187 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.10 · 51.3% (96 of 187 decks)
- Vault of Champions relevance 0.14 · 17.1% (32 of 187 decks)
- Woodland Cemetery relevance 0.09 · 60.4% (113 of 187 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.16 · 10.2% (19 of 187 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.10 · 55.6% (104 of 187 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.15 · 10.7% (20 of 187 decks)
- Desolate Mire relevance 0.20 · 3.7% (7 of 187 decks)
- Godless Shrine relevance 0.10 · 48.7% (91 of 187 decks)
- Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.09 · 52.4% (98 of 187 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.16 · 8.0% (15 of 187 decks)
- Isolated Chapel relevance 0.09 · 49.2% (92 of 187 decks)
- Tranquil Expanse relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Scrubland relevance 0.15 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Forsaken Sanctuary relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (4 of 187 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.15 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.15 · 5.9% (11 of 187 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (5 of 187 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Daghatar the Adamant, from 187 real Commander decks.