Cards like Thought Scour
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
100% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
83% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards like Gush
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
67% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards like Blink of an Eye
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
67% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
2.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
- Blink of an Eye 67%
- Into the Roil 67%
- Unauthorized Exit 50%
- Whoosh! 17%
Other options: Void Snare, Perilous Voyage, Geistwave, Machine Over Matter, Banishing Betrayal, Alchemist's Retrieval, Disperse, Boomerang Basics, Depart the Realm
Cards like Logic Knot
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
67% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
3.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
- Logic Knot 83%
- Lose Focus 67%
- Spell Pierce 67%
- Mana Leak 50%
- Force Spike 17%
- Don't Make a Sound 17%
Other options: Reasonable Doubt, Clash of Wills, Make Disappear, Revolutionary Rebuff, Metallic Rebuke, It'll Quench Ya!, Rethink, Quench
Cards like Preordain
9.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other blue decks
67% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
- Preordain 83%
- Serum Visions 67%
Other options: Deliberate, Scour All Possibilities, Foresee, Tamiyo's Epiphany, Introduction to Prophecy
Cards like Consider
5.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Counterspell
2.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other blue decks
83% of decks run two or more
vs. 33% of other blue decks
2.7 per deck on average
vs. 1.1 in other blue decks
Cards
- Counterspell 83%
- Negate 67%
- Intervene 50%
- Flash Counter 33%
- Essence Scatter 17%
- False Summoning 17%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Disruption Protocol, Nullify, Wash Away, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Wild Unraveling, Outwit
Cards like One With the Wind
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- One With the Wind 50%
- Spectral Flight 50%
- Arcane Flight 33%
Cards like Tolarian Terror
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Tolarian Terror 83%
- Cryptic Serpent 50%
Cards like Otherworldly Gaze
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Ponder
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Slip Through Space
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Pym Particles, Touch of Invisibility
Cards like Dispersal Shield
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
- Dispersal Shield 67%
- Prohibit 33%
Cards like Compelling Argument
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Compelling Argument 67%
- Tome Scour 33%
Cards like Force Away
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force Away 50%
- Unexplained Disappearance 33%
- Stern Dismissal 33%
- Ephara's Dispersal 17%
- Unsummon 17%
Other options: Drag Under, Voyage's End, Galestrike, Fading Hope, Repulse, Just the Wind, Consuming Vortex, Ice Magic, Drown in Shapelessness, Unsubstantiate, Symbol of Unsummoning, Sweep Away, Arrester's Admonition, Select for Inspection
Cards like Mizzium Skin
7.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mizzium Skin 33%
- Dive Down 33%
- You See a Guard Approach 33%
- Magic Damper 17%
Other options: Glint, Octopus Form, Shell Shield, Chase Inspiration, Shore Up
Cards like Spectral Interference
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards like Taigam's Scheming
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like String of Disappearances
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- String of Disappearances 33%
- Withdraw 17%
- Curfew 17%
Other options: Run Away Together, Peel from Reality
Cards like Aqueous Form
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Aqueous Form 33%
- Security Bypass 33%
Cards like Sapphire Charm
20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards like Gitaxian Probe
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Gitaxian Probe 83%
- Sorcerous Sight 17%
- Clairvoyance 17%
- Peek 17%
All top picks (50)
- Logic Knot relevance 0.27 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Sapphire Charm relevance 0.25 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Merfolk Secretkeeper // Venture Deeper relevance 0.25 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Winds of Rebuke relevance 0.24 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Serpentine Curve relevance 0.27 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 0.27 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Foresight relevance 0.30 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Tolarian Terror relevance 0.23 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Mental Note relevance 0.23 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- You Come to a River relevance 0.23 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Compelling Argument relevance 0.24 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Miscalculation relevance 0.22 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Force Away relevance 0.25 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Spectral Flight relevance 0.24 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.19 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Veil of Secrecy relevance 0.23 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.20 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Echoing Truth relevance 0.20 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- One With the Wind relevance 0.23 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.18 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Vision Charm relevance 0.23 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 0.20 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Maximize Altitude relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.15 · 100.0% (6 of 6 decks)
- Cryptic Serpent relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Intervene relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Hard Evidence relevance 0.19 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Blink of an Eye relevance 0.19 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Hieroglyphic Illumination relevance 0.21 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.16 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Cartouche of Knowledge relevance 0.20 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.17 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Spell Rupture relevance 0.19 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.17 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Unauthorized Exit relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Fallaji Archaeologist relevance 0.21 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.16 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Prohibit relevance 0.21 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Artful Dodge relevance 0.16 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Deprive relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.15 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.15 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.15 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 0.19 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Distortion Strike relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Shriekhorn relevance 0.18 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.12 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.14 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All creatures (13)
- Merfolk Secretkeeper // Venture Deeper relevance 0.25 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Tolarian Terror relevance 0.23 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Cryptic Serpent relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Fallaji Archaeologist relevance 0.21 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Delver of Secrets // Insectile Aberration relevance 0.16 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Sword Coast Serpent // Capsizing Wave relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Augur of Bolas relevance 0.13 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Sea Hag // Aquatic Ingress relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Queen of Ice // Rage of Winter relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Young Blue Dragon // Sand Augury relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Aquatic Alchemist // Bubble Up relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Iceberg Cancrix relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.07 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Shriekhorn relevance 0.18 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All enchantments (9)
- Spectral Flight relevance 0.24 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- One With the Wind relevance 0.23 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Cartouche of Knowledge relevance 0.20 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Arcane Flight relevance 0.17 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.13 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Locked in the Cemetery relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Dragon Wings relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.09 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
All instants (50)
- Logic Knot relevance 0.27 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Sapphire Charm relevance 0.25 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Winds of Rebuke relevance 0.24 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 0.27 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Mental Note relevance 0.23 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- You Come to a River relevance 0.23 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Miscalculation relevance 0.22 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Force Away relevance 0.25 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.19 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Veil of Secrecy relevance 0.23 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.20 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Echoing Truth relevance 0.20 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.18 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Vision Charm relevance 0.23 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.15 · 100.0% (6 of 6 decks)
- Intervene relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Blink of an Eye relevance 0.19 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Hieroglyphic Illumination relevance 0.21 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.16 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.17 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Spell Rupture relevance 0.19 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Unauthorized Exit relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.16 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Prohibit relevance 0.21 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Deprive relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.15 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.15 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 0.19 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.12 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- String of Disappearances relevance 0.18 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Unexplained Disappearance relevance 0.18 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Tolarian Winds relevance 0.14 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Phantom Interference relevance 0.17 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.14 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Spectral Interference relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Stern Dismissal relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- You See a Guard Approach relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.09 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Dream Twist relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.12 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 0.13 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.10 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Defy Gravity relevance 0.13 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Mizzium Skin relevance 0.12 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- False Summoning relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Withdraw relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Downsize relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
All sorceries (34)
- Serpentine Curve relevance 0.27 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Foresight relevance 0.30 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Compelling Argument relevance 0.24 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 0.20 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Maximize Altitude relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Hard Evidence relevance 0.19 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.17 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Artful Dodge relevance 0.16 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.15 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Distortion Strike relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.14 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Taigam's Scheming relevance 0.18 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.14 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.12 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.11 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.11 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.11 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Tome Scour relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Command Performance relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.07 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Sorcerous Sight relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Hands of Binding relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.06 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Silent Departure relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Contingency Plan relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Stream of Thought relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Ideas Unbound relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All utility lands (5)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.22 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.09 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Soaring Seacliff relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- The Surgical Bay relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.04 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (4)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.03 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Sailors' Bane, from 6 real Commander decks.