Cards like Goblin Electromancer
13× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Grixis decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Grixis decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Grixis decks
Cards
- Goblin Electromancer 62%
- Stormcatch Mentor 32%
- Haughty Djinn 23%
- Baral, Chief of Compliance 16%
- Mocking Sprite 9%
Other options: Spectacle Mage
Cards like Bribery
Over 20× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Grixis decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Grixis decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Grixis decks
Cards
- Bribery 46%
- Acquire 32%
- Eternal Dominion 4%
Cards like Archmage Emeritus
15× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Grixis decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Grixis decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Grixis decks
Cards
Other options: Muse Seeker, Academy Wall, Windrider Wizard, Lunar Mystic
Cards like Gitaxian Probe
Over 20× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Grixis decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Grixis decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Grixis decks
Cards
- Gitaxian Probe 38%
- Peek 36%
- Sorcerous Sight 2%
- Clairvoyance 2%
Cards like Ioreth of the Healing House
Over 20× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Grixis decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Grixis decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Grixis decks
Cards
Other options: Fatestitcher, Forensic Researcher, North Pole Patrol
Cards like Siphon Insight
16× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Grixis decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Grixis decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Grixis decks
Cards
- Siphon Insight 30%
- Outrageous Robbery 14%
Cards like Illusionist's Bracers
Over 20× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Grixis decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Grixis decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Grixis decks
Cards
Cards like Mystical Tutor
3.8× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Grixis decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Grixis decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Grixis decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession, Merchant Scroll
Cards like Furnace Reins
Over 20× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Grixis decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Grixis decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Grixis decks
Cards
Cards like Double Vision
7.7× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Grixis decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Grixis decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Grixis decks
Cards
Other options: Cloven Casting, Mirror Sheen
Cards like Rakdos's Return
Over 20× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Grixis decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Grixis decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Grixis decks
Cards like Counterspell
1.2× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Grixis decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other Grixis decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.65 in other Grixis decks
Cards
- Counterspell 41%
- Negate 21%
Other options: Wash Away, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Essence Scatter, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Wild Unraveling, Outwit
Cards like Stolen Goods
19× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Grixis decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Grixis decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Grixis decks
Cards
- Stolen Goods 36%
- Dream Harvest 3%
Cards like Guttersnipe
3.1× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Grixis decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Grixis decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Grixis decks
Cards
- Guttersnipe 23%
- Erebor Flamesmith 2%
Other options: Electrostatic Field, Thunderdrum Soloist, Satyr Firedancer, Rockslide Sorcerer, Weaver of Lightning
Cards like Thought Vessel
1.8× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Grixis decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Grixis decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Grixis decks
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.1× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Grixis decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Grixis decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.53 in other Grixis decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 30%
- Swiftfoot Boots 27%
Cards like Rakdos Charm
3.3× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Grixis decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Grixis decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Grixis decks
Cards like Thought Scour
Over 20× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Grixis decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Grixis decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Grixis decks
Cards like Patriar's Seal
5.0× as likely as other Grixis decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Grixis decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Grixis decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Grixis decks
Cards
Other options: Victory Chimes, Relic of Legends, Spectral Searchlight, Honor-Worn Shaku
All top picks (50)
- Talent of the Telepath relevance 0.56 · 48.5% (64 of 132 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.58 · 40.9% (54 of 132 decks)
- Leadership Vacuum relevance 0.53 · 47.7% (63 of 132 decks)
- Exterminator Magmarch relevance 0.55 · 41.7% (55 of 132 decks)
- Stolen Goods relevance 0.56 · 36.4% (48 of 132 decks)
- Worst Fears relevance 0.49 · 42.4% (56 of 132 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 0.55 · 31.8% (42 of 132 decks)
- Acquire relevance 0.55 · 31.8% (42 of 132 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.54 · 31.8% (42 of 132 decks)
- Hell to Pay relevance 0.52 · 34.8% (46 of 132 decks)
- Rakdos's Return relevance 0.56 · 28.0% (37 of 132 decks)
- Flick a Coin relevance 0.50 · 38.6% (51 of 132 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.46 · 46.2% (61 of 132 decks)
- Pilfered Plans relevance 0.55 · 28.0% (37 of 132 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.51 · 35.6% (47 of 132 decks)
- Cruel Ultimatum relevance 0.38 · 63.6% (84 of 132 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.45 · 44.7% (59 of 132 decks)
- Great Intelligence's Plan relevance 0.47 · 41.7% (55 of 132 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.54 · 25.0% (33 of 132 decks)
- Extract Brain relevance 0.54 · 22.7% (30 of 132 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.55 · 20.5% (27 of 132 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.53 · 19.7% (26 of 132 decks)
- Siphon Insight relevance 0.47 · 29.5% (39 of 132 decks)
- Rush of Dread relevance 0.50 · 23.5% (31 of 132 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.43 · 35.6% (47 of 132 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.53 · 14.4% (19 of 132 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.52 · 15.2% (20 of 132 decks)
- Furnace Reins relevance 0.52 · 15.2% (20 of 132 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.43 · 33.3% (44 of 132 decks)
- Cormela, Glamour Thief relevance 0.31 · 62.1% (82 of 132 decks)
- Invoke Despair relevance 0.51 · 13.6% (18 of 132 decks)
- Wizards of Thay relevance 0.37 · 43.9% (58 of 132 decks)
- You Find Some Prisoners relevance 0.48 · 16.7% (22 of 132 decks)
- Telemin Performance relevance 0.52 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Head Games relevance 0.49 · 14.4% (19 of 132 decks)
- This Is How It Ends relevance 0.47 · 18.2% (24 of 132 decks)
- Fortune's Favor relevance 0.51 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Din of the Fireherd relevance 0.51 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Choice of Damnations relevance 0.47 · 15.2% (20 of 132 decks)
- Outrageous Robbery relevance 0.47 · 14.4% (19 of 132 decks)
- Cruelclaw's Heist relevance 0.48 · 13.6% (18 of 132 decks)
- Haughty Djinn relevance 0.42 · 23.5% (31 of 132 decks)
- Cleansing Wildfire relevance 0.49 · 11.4% (15 of 132 decks)
- Mindsplice Apparatus relevance 0.37 · 34.1% (45 of 132 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 0.49 · 10.6% (14 of 132 decks)
- Black Sun's Twilight relevance 0.46 · 12.9% (17 of 132 decks)
- The Enigma Jewel // Locus of Enlightenment relevance 0.49 · 9.1% (12 of 132 decks)
- Lier, Disciple of the Drowned relevance 0.36 · 33.3% (44 of 132 decks)
- Voracious Bibliophile relevance 0.45 · 10.6% (14 of 132 decks)
- Sedgemoor Witch relevance 0.34 · 34.1% (45 of 132 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.58 · 40.9% (54 of 132 decks)
- Exterminator Magmarch relevance 0.55 · 41.7% (55 of 132 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.53 · 19.7% (26 of 132 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.53 · 14.4% (19 of 132 decks)
- Cormela, Glamour Thief relevance 0.31 · 62.1% (82 of 132 decks)
- Wizards of Thay relevance 0.37 · 43.9% (58 of 132 decks)
- Haughty Djinn relevance 0.42 · 23.5% (31 of 132 decks)
- Lier, Disciple of the Drowned relevance 0.36 · 33.3% (44 of 132 decks)
- Voracious Bibliophile relevance 0.45 · 10.6% (14 of 132 decks)
- Sedgemoor Witch relevance 0.34 · 34.1% (45 of 132 decks)
- Clever Conjurer relevance 0.47 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Marvin, Murderous Mimic relevance 0.44 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.44 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Kess, Dissident Mage relevance 0.25 · 53.8% (71 of 132 decks)
- Marchesa, Dealer of Death relevance 0.42 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Spinerock Tyrant relevance 0.37 · 11.4% (15 of 132 decks)
- Decadent Dragon // Expensive Taste relevance 0.38 · 9.1% (12 of 132 decks)
- Deekah, Fractal Theorist relevance 0.35 · 12.9% (17 of 132 decks)
- Zaffai, Thunder Conductor relevance 0.39 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
- Third Path Iconoclast relevance 0.33 · 14.4% (19 of 132 decks)
- Mizzix of the Izmagnus relevance 0.35 · 9.1% (12 of 132 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.35 · 9.1% (12 of 132 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.27 · 28.0% (37 of 132 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 0.36 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Ovika, Enigma Goliath relevance 0.34 · 9.8% (13 of 132 decks)
- Radiant Performer relevance 0.38 · 5.3% (7 of 132 decks)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.18 · 62.1% (82 of 132 decks)
- Mocking Sprite relevance 0.34 · 9.1% (12 of 132 decks)
- Young Pyromancer relevance 0.29 · 15.2% (20 of 132 decks)
- Thunderclap Drake relevance 0.29 · 15.9% (21 of 132 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.28 · 15.9% (21 of 132 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.27 · 18.2% (24 of 132 decks)
- Stormcatch Mentor relevance 0.22 · 31.8% (42 of 132 decks)
- Abstract Paintmage relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
- Errant, Street Artist relevance 0.30 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Fire Lord Azula relevance 0.30 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
- Nightscape Familiar relevance 0.15 · 59.8% (79 of 132 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.13 · 78.0% (103 of 132 decks)
- Magda, the Hoardmaster relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
- Judith, Carnage Connoisseur relevance 0.27 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Vadrik, Astral Archmage relevance 0.32 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Storm-Kiln Artist relevance 0.12 · 75.8% (100 of 132 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.31 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Stinging Lionfish relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Exalted Flamer of Tzeentch relevance 0.26 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Ashling, Flame Dancer relevance 0.21 · 15.2% (20 of 132 decks)
- Galazeth Prismari relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Mogis, God of Slaughter relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.23 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.54 · 25.0% (33 of 132 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.52 · 15.2% (20 of 132 decks)
- Mindsplice Apparatus relevance 0.37 · 34.1% (45 of 132 decks)
- The Enigma Jewel // Locus of Enlightenment relevance 0.49 · 9.1% (12 of 132 decks)
- Battlemage's Bracers relevance 0.46 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.41 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Twinning Staff relevance 0.23 · 42.4% (56 of 132 decks)
- Resonating Lute relevance 0.24 · 25.8% (34 of 132 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.33 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.29 · 11.4% (15 of 132 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.29 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Tablet of Discovery relevance 0.27 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.26 · 11.4% (15 of 132 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.30 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.21 · 22.7% (30 of 132 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.23 · 9.8% (13 of 132 decks)
- Wand of Wonder relevance 0.26 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.17 · 30.3% (40 of 132 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.33 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Glamdring, Foe-hammer // Gleam of Death relevance 0.23 · 5.3% (7 of 132 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.20 · 9.8% (13 of 132 decks)
- Thran Turbine relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Rakdos Signet relevance 0.17 · 22.7% (30 of 132 decks)
- Helm of Awakening relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.15 · 30.3% (40 of 132 decks)
- Fire Diamond relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.16 · 25.8% (34 of 132 decks)
- Pyromancer's Goggles relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Relic of Sauron relevance 0.17 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.14 · 27.3% (36 of 132 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.13 · 34.8% (46 of 132 decks)
- Firemind Vessel relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.17 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Chaos Wand relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Adaptive Training Post relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Talisman of Creativity relevance 0.10 · 41.7% (55 of 132 decks)
- Obelisk of Grixis relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Talisman of Indulgence relevance 0.11 · 29.5% (39 of 132 decks)
- Talisman of Dominance relevance 0.10 · 36.4% (48 of 132 decks)
- Dragonfire Blade relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
All enchantments (36)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.55 · 20.5% (27 of 132 decks)
- Arcane Bombardment relevance 0.33 · 31.8% (42 of 132 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.40 · 14.4% (19 of 132 decks)
- Font of Magic relevance 0.40 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.38 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Double Vision relevance 0.29 · 17.4% (23 of 132 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.38 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Arcane Melee relevance 0.34 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.29 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Maestros Ascendancy relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.22 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Thousand-Year Storm relevance 0.21 · 10.6% (14 of 132 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.31 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Psychic Surgery relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Control Magic relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.17 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Swarm Intelligence relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.15 · 11.4% (15 of 132 decks)
- Return the Past relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Braid of Fire relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Dual Casting relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- No Mercy relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.14 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
- Nowhere to Run relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Fiery Inscription relevance 0.14 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Artist's Talent relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
All instants (50)
- Leadership Vacuum relevance 0.53 · 47.7% (63 of 132 decks)
- Flick a Coin relevance 0.50 · 38.6% (51 of 132 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.51 · 35.6% (47 of 132 decks)
- Siphon Insight relevance 0.47 · 29.5% (39 of 132 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.43 · 35.6% (47 of 132 decks)
- You Find Some Prisoners relevance 0.48 · 16.7% (22 of 132 decks)
- This Is How It Ends relevance 0.47 · 18.2% (24 of 132 decks)
- Fortune's Favor relevance 0.51 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Outrageous Robbery relevance 0.47 · 14.4% (19 of 132 decks)
- Black Sun's Twilight relevance 0.46 · 12.9% (17 of 132 decks)
- Deadly Derision relevance 0.43 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Blot Out relevance 0.44 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Hurl Through Hell relevance 0.39 · 9.8% (13 of 132 decks)
- Bedevil relevance 0.29 · 31.8% (42 of 132 decks)
- Repulse relevance 0.36 · 5.3% (7 of 132 decks)
- Traumatic Critique relevance 0.31 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Crosis's Charm relevance 0.32 · 9.8% (13 of 132 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.31 · 11.4% (15 of 132 decks)
- Wild Magic Surge relevance 0.34 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
- Terminate relevance 0.21 · 39.4% (52 of 132 decks)
- Press the Enemy relevance 0.31 · 9.1% (12 of 132 decks)
- Depths of Desire relevance 0.37 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Hithlain Knots relevance 0.34 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Display of Power relevance 0.30 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.17 · 52.3% (69 of 132 decks)
- Rakdos Charm relevance 0.22 · 29.5% (39 of 132 decks)
- Overkill relevance 0.29 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Electrodominance relevance 0.19 · 40.2% (53 of 132 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.17 · 49.2% (65 of 132 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.33 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Sudden Spoiling relevance 0.30 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.21 · 25.8% (34 of 132 decks)
- Blessed Reincarnation relevance 0.36 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Prophetic Bolt relevance 0.31 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Izzet Charm relevance 0.25 · 9.1% (12 of 132 decks)
- Creative Outburst relevance 0.31 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.26 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
- Out of the Way relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.24 · 9.1% (12 of 132 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.27 · 5.3% (7 of 132 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.29 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Price of Fame relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.24 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Return the Favor relevance 0.20 · 13.6% (18 of 132 decks)
- Tragic Slip relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Baleful Mastery relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.17 · 21.2% (28 of 132 decks)
- Withering Torment relevance 0.20 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Polymorphist's Jest relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Talent of the Telepath relevance 0.56 · 48.5% (64 of 132 decks)
- Stolen Goods relevance 0.56 · 36.4% (48 of 132 decks)
- Worst Fears relevance 0.49 · 42.4% (56 of 132 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 0.55 · 31.8% (42 of 132 decks)
- Acquire relevance 0.55 · 31.8% (42 of 132 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.54 · 31.8% (42 of 132 decks)
- Hell to Pay relevance 0.52 · 34.8% (46 of 132 decks)
- Rakdos's Return relevance 0.56 · 28.0% (37 of 132 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.46 · 46.2% (61 of 132 decks)
- Pilfered Plans relevance 0.55 · 28.0% (37 of 132 decks)
- Cruel Ultimatum relevance 0.38 · 63.6% (84 of 132 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.45 · 44.7% (59 of 132 decks)
- Great Intelligence's Plan relevance 0.47 · 41.7% (55 of 132 decks)
- Extract Brain relevance 0.54 · 22.7% (30 of 132 decks)
- Rush of Dread relevance 0.50 · 23.5% (31 of 132 decks)
- Furnace Reins relevance 0.52 · 15.2% (20 of 132 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.43 · 33.3% (44 of 132 decks)
- Invoke Despair relevance 0.51 · 13.6% (18 of 132 decks)
- Telemin Performance relevance 0.52 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Head Games relevance 0.49 · 14.4% (19 of 132 decks)
- Din of the Fireherd relevance 0.51 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Choice of Damnations relevance 0.47 · 15.2% (20 of 132 decks)
- Cruelclaw's Heist relevance 0.48 · 13.6% (18 of 132 decks)
- Cleansing Wildfire relevance 0.49 · 11.4% (15 of 132 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 0.49 · 10.6% (14 of 132 decks)
- Sorcerous Squall relevance 0.41 · 14.4% (19 of 132 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.39 · 15.2% (20 of 132 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.31 · 37.9% (50 of 132 decks)
- Bonfire of the Damned relevance 0.44 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Involuntary Employment relevance 0.44 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Banefire relevance 0.42 · 10.6% (14 of 132 decks)
- Go Blank relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
- Traitorous Greed relevance 0.44 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
- Rousing Refrain relevance 0.37 · 11.4% (15 of 132 decks)
- Act of Treason relevance 0.41 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
- Praetor's Grasp relevance 0.34 · 15.2% (20 of 132 decks)
- Blightning relevance 0.42 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.37 · 9.8% (13 of 132 decks)
- Covetous Urge relevance 0.41 · 5.3% (7 of 132 decks)
- Vengeful Possession relevance 0.40 · 5.3% (7 of 132 decks)
- Hymn to Tourach relevance 0.40 · 5.3% (7 of 132 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.32 · 15.2% (20 of 132 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.36 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Invoke the Winds relevance 0.38 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Sorin's Vengeance relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (7 of 132 decks)
- Cornered by Black Mages relevance 0.30 · 16.7% (22 of 132 decks)
- Price of Freedom relevance 0.36 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
- Overwhelming Forces relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (7 of 132 decks)
- Grasping Tentacles relevance 0.36 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Eternal Dominion relevance 0.36 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (5)
- Professor Onyx relevance 0.30 · 25.0% (33 of 132 decks)
- Chandra, Hope's Beacon relevance 0.32 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Ral, Storm Conduit relevance 0.20 · 5.3% (7 of 132 decks)
- Ral, Monsoon Mage // Ral, Leyline Prodigy relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Ral, Crackling Wit relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.40 · 15.9% (21 of 132 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.28 · 26.5% (35 of 132 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.34 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Seething Landscape relevance 0.23 · 31.8% (42 of 132 decks)
- Pinnacle Monk // Mystic Peak relevance 0.24 · 18.9% (25 of 132 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.23 · 19.7% (26 of 132 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.26 · 9.8% (13 of 132 decks)
- Bloodsoaked Insight // Sanguine Morass relevance 0.26 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.16 · 42.4% (56 of 132 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.18 · 26.5% (35 of 132 decks)
- Spikefield Hazard // Spikefield Cave relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Xander's Lounge relevance 0.14 · 50.0% (66 of 132 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.19 · 16.7% (22 of 132 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.24 · 5.3% (7 of 132 decks)
- Temple of Epiphany relevance 0.19 · 13.6% (18 of 132 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.23 · 5.3% (7 of 132 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.20 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Raucous Theater relevance 0.20 · 10.6% (14 of 132 decks)
- Restless Reef relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Sundering Eruption // Volcanic Fissure relevance 0.22 · 5.3% (7 of 132 decks)
- Song-Mad Treachery // Song-Mad Ruins relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Ominous Cemetery relevance 0.31 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.20 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.20 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Fiery Islet relevance 0.21 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.18 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Temple of Malice relevance 0.20 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Creeping Tar Pit relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.18 · 9.8% (13 of 132 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.20 · 5.3% (7 of 132 decks)
- Fetid Pools relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Great Hall of the Biblioplex relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.19 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
- Thundering Falls relevance 0.18 · 9.1% (12 of 132 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Pelakka Predation // Pelakka Caverns relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.14 · 15.2% (20 of 132 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.18 · 5.3% (7 of 132 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Canyon Slough relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Prismari Campus relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Waterfront District relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Sokenzan, Crucible of Defiance relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (3 of 132 decks)
All lands (50)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.31 · 15.2% (20 of 132 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.30 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Rakdos Carnarium relevance 0.26 · 15.9% (21 of 132 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.25 · 20.5% (27 of 132 decks)
- Crosis's Catacombs relevance 0.30 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.26 · 16.7% (22 of 132 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.25 · 15.2% (20 of 132 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.22 · 21.2% (28 of 132 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.19 · 37.9% (50 of 132 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.23 · 16.7% (22 of 132 decks)
- Haunted Ridge relevance 0.19 · 32.6% (43 of 132 decks)
- Blightstep Pathway // Searstep Pathway relevance 0.25 · 10.6% (14 of 132 decks)
- Riverglide Pathway // Lavaglide Pathway relevance 0.24 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.24 · 10.6% (14 of 132 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.25 · 9.1% (12 of 132 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.19 · 25.0% (33 of 132 decks)
- Swiftwater Cliffs relevance 0.24 · 9.8% (13 of 132 decks)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.22 · 14.4% (19 of 132 decks)
- Darkwater Catacombs relevance 0.21 · 16.7% (22 of 132 decks)
- Luxury Suite relevance 0.17 · 35.6% (47 of 132 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.17 · 35.6% (47 of 132 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.24 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.19 · 18.9% (25 of 132 decks)
- Bloodfell Caves relevance 0.23 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Tainted Isle relevance 0.24 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
- Shadowblood Ridge relevance 0.20 · 12.9% (17 of 132 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.21 · 11.4% (15 of 132 decks)
- Training Center relevance 0.16 · 37.1% (49 of 132 decks)
- Eroded Canyon relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Rakdos Guildgate relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Crumbling Necropolis relevance 0.12 · 59.8% (79 of 132 decks)
- Cascade Bluffs relevance 0.17 · 24.2% (32 of 132 decks)
- Izzet Guildgate relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Stormcarved Coast relevance 0.14 · 37.9% (50 of 132 decks)
- Foreboding Ruins relevance 0.18 · 13.6% (18 of 132 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.19 · 10.6% (14 of 132 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Darkslick Shores relevance 0.21 · 5.3% (7 of 132 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Graven Cairns relevance 0.19 · 9.8% (13 of 132 decks)
- Crypt of the Eternals relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Sunken Hollow relevance 0.13 · 36.4% (48 of 132 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.19 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
- Grixis Panorama relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (5 of 132 decks)
- Smoldering Marsh relevance 0.13 · 31.8% (42 of 132 decks)
- Blazemire Verge relevance 0.18 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.14 · 25.8% (34 of 132 decks)
- Blackcleave Cliffs relevance 0.19 · 4.5% (6 of 132 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.13 · 29.5% (39 of 132 decks)
- Sulfurous Springs relevance 0.13 · 28.8% (38 of 132 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Zevlor, Elturel Exile, from 132 real Commander decks.