Cards like Duskshell Crawler
16× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Selesnya decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Duskshell Crawler 47%
- Pridemalkin 47%
- Tuskguard Captain 16%
- Drix Fatemaker 8%
- Gnarlid Colony 5%
- Crowned Ceratok 2%
Other options: Baloth Pup, Trollbred Guardian
Cards like Hardened Scales
5.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Selesnya decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Kami of Whispered Hopes
8.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Selesnya decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Kami of Whispered Hopes 45%
- Gyre Sage 31%
- Incubation Druid 22%
Cards like Arahbo, the First Fang
5.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Selesnya decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
6.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Medusa, Inhuman Queen
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Selesnya decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Selesnya decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 47%
- Three Visits 30%
- Glimpse the Core 5%
- Skyshroud Claim 3%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Field Trip, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Hunting Wilds
Cards like Bristly Bill, Spine Sower
6.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 19%
- Mossborn Hydra 11%
- Territorial Scythecat 8%
- Scythecat Cub 8%
- Oran-Rief Hydra 2%
- Prowling Felidar 2%
Other options: Seedship Agrarian, Foe-liage, Floral Evoker, Vinelasher Kudzu, Murasa Ranger, Sazh's Chocobo, Undergrowth Champion
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
2.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 28% of other Selesnya decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 44%
- Lightning Greaves 25%
Cards like Anthem of Champions
4.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Muraganda Petroglyphs
Cards like Beast Within
1.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 39% of other Selesnya decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 19% of other Selesnya decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Beast Within 48%
- Generous Gift 38%
Cards like Ozolith, the Shattered Spire
5.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Snakeskin Veil
4.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Ranger's Guile, Woodcutter's Grit
Cards like Ouroboroid
9.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Loxodon Battle Priest
Cards like Goldvein Hydra
8.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Goldvein Hydra 23%
- Ochre Jelly 16%
- Vastwood Hydra 2%
- Lifeblood Hydra 2%
Cards like Botanical Brawler
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Terrasymbiosis
9.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Inspiring Call
3.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Selesnya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
2.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Selesnya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Walking Ballista
8.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Path to Exile
2.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 54% of other Selesnya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.57 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Envoy of the Ancestors
2.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Loyal Guardian
2.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Loyal Guardian 16%
- Thunderfoot Baloth 13%
Cards like Lion Sash
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Sphere Grid
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Sphere Grid 20%
- Training Regimen 2%
Cards like Hunter's Insight
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Mikaeus, the Lunarch
12× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Ajani, the Greathearted
3.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Rishkar's Expertise
3.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Requisition Raid
3.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Pridemalkin relevance 0.35 · 46.9% (30 of 64 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.37 · 37.5% (24 of 64 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.30 · 54.7% (35 of 64 decks)
- Botanical Brawler relevance 0.33 · 42.2% (27 of 64 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.31 · 46.9% (30 of 64 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.28 · 54.7% (35 of 64 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.31 · 39.1% (25 of 64 decks)
- Flowering of the White Tree relevance 0.32 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Ochre Jelly relevance 0.38 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 0.35 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Clamavus relevance 0.38 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.31 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.29 · 35.9% (23 of 64 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.33 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.23 · 59.4% (38 of 64 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.30 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.35 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Anthem of Champions relevance 0.30 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Phantom Tiger relevance 0.37 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Dusk Legion Duelist relevance 0.31 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.21 · 62.5% (40 of 64 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.25 · 45.3% (29 of 64 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.25 · 42.2% (27 of 64 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.28 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.32 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Mikaeus, the Lunarch relevance 0.27 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.26 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Faithful Watchdog relevance 0.33 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Arahbo, Roar of the World relevance 0.35 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.27 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.30 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.29 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.24 · 40.6% (26 of 64 decks)
- Railway Brawler relevance 0.31 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 0.33 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.28 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 0.30 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 0.30 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.28 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Scrounging Bandar relevance 0.34 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.27 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Skyhunter Strike Force relevance 0.28 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.27 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.28 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.26 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Dolmen Gate relevance 0.32 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Always Watching relevance 0.32 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Loyal Guardian relevance 0.29 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Pridemalkin relevance 0.35 · 46.9% (30 of 64 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.37 · 37.5% (24 of 64 decks)
- Botanical Brawler relevance 0.33 · 42.2% (27 of 64 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.31 · 46.9% (30 of 64 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.31 · 39.1% (25 of 64 decks)
- Ochre Jelly relevance 0.38 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 0.35 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Clamavus relevance 0.38 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.31 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.30 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Phantom Tiger relevance 0.37 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Dusk Legion Duelist relevance 0.31 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.25 · 45.3% (29 of 64 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.28 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.32 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Mikaeus, the Lunarch relevance 0.27 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Faithful Watchdog relevance 0.33 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Arahbo, Roar of the World relevance 0.35 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.30 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.29 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.24 · 40.6% (26 of 64 decks)
- Railway Brawler relevance 0.31 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 0.33 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 0.30 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 0.30 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Scrounging Bandar relevance 0.34 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Skyhunter Strike Force relevance 0.28 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.27 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Loyal Guardian relevance 0.29 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.27 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Nyxborn Hydra relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Ainok Bond-Kin relevance 0.29 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Aberrant relevance 0.33 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.24 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider relevance 0.30 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Skyknight Squire relevance 0.26 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Qala, Ajani's Pridemate relevance 0.30 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Arcbound Mouser relevance 0.30 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Mirri, Weatherlight Duelist relevance 0.22 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.26 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.28 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Envoy of the Ancestors relevance 0.25 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Benevolent Hydra relevance 0.28 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Tyrant Guard relevance 0.30 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Kaheera, the Orphanguard relevance 0.24 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.23 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.27 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.28 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.28 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.27 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Dolmen Gate relevance 0.32 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Andúril, Narsil Reforged relevance 0.30 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.19 · 43.8% (28 of 64 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.26 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.20 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.19 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Thunderous Velocipede relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.24 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.21 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Celestial Armor relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Esika's Chariot relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Locket of Yesterdays relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Spellweaver Helix relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Necklace of Girion relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- O-Naginata relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Lux Artillery relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.10 · 60.9% (39 of 64 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.16 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Key to the City relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Lumen-Class Frigate relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.16 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Conjurer's Mantle relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Thrumming Stone relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Bloodforged Battle-Axe relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Heirloom Blade relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Maul of the Skyclaves relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.30 · 54.7% (35 of 64 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.28 · 54.7% (35 of 64 decks)
- Flowering of the White Tree relevance 0.32 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.33 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.35 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Anthem of Champions relevance 0.30 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.21 · 62.5% (40 of 64 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.25 · 42.2% (27 of 64 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.26 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.26 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Always Watching relevance 0.32 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.26 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Reconnaissance relevance 0.26 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Together Forever relevance 0.29 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.27 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Glorious Anthem relevance 0.27 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 0.27 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.20 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.26 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.27 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Marshal's Anthem relevance 0.27 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.25 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.26 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.21 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.24 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- In the Trenches relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Primal Rage relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.19 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Case of the Trampled Garden relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Virtue of Loyalty // Ardenvale Fealty relevance 0.21 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.17 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Paladin Class relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Communal Brewing relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Privileged Position relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.16 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Starlight Spectacular relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Warrior's Resolve relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Darksteel Mutation relevance 0.16 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.15 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Grasp of Fate relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
All instants (50)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.23 · 59.4% (38 of 64 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 0.31 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.21 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 0.26 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.21 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.20 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.20 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.23 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.21 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.16 · 37.5% (24 of 64 decks)
- Take Up the Shield relevance 0.23 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.14 · 48.4% (31 of 64 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.22 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.21 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Blitzball Shot relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Ruinous Intrusion relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.18 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Warriors' Lesson relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Yuna's Whistle relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Barrier Breach relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.12 · 46.9% (30 of 64 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.19 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.16 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Kindred Summons relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Get Lost relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Rebuff the Wicked relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Wilt relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Excise the Imperfect relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.17 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Regent's Authority relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Solidarity of Heroes relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Duty Beyond Death relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.15 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Galadriel's Dismissal relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.17 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Spectacular Tactics relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Sarkhan's Resolve relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.14 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Signature Slam relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Pillar Launch relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Valorous Stance relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Erode relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Lightfoot Technique relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.15 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Condemn relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Reprieve relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.29 · 35.9% (23 of 64 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.28 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.24 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Over the Edge relevance 0.31 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Practiced Offense relevance 0.29 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.17 · 46.9% (30 of 64 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.24 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.17 · 37.5% (24 of 64 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.25 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Storm the Seedcore relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.18 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.22 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Glimpse the Core relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.19 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Helping Hand relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Synchronized Charge relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.17 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.19 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Slime Against Humanity relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Lay of the Land relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.17 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.20 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.15 · 32.8% (21 of 64 decks)
- Flower // Flourish relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Study the Classics relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.16 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Secret Rendezvous relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Felling Blow relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Council's Judgment relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Increasing Savagery relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Recommission relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Split Up relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Cleansing Nova relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Harsh Mercy relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Contest of Claws relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Biogenic Upgrade relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.14 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Soul's Majesty relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.13 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Single Combat relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Open the Armory relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (19)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.28 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Ajani Steadfast relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Ajani, Adversary of Tyrants relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Ajani, Caller of the Pride relevance 0.19 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Ajani, Sleeper Agent relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Ajani, Strength of the Pride relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Basri Ket relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Garruk, Curse Breaker relevance 0.17 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Elspeth, Storm Slayer relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Ajani, Inspiring Leader relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Ajani, Valiant Protector relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Ajani, Wise Counselor relevance 0.13 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Ajani Goldmane relevance 0.12 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Ajani Unyielding relevance 0.12 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Ajani, Mentor of Heroes relevance 0.11 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Elspeth, Sun's Champion relevance 0.09 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.08 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (5)
- Invasion of Gobakhan // Lightshield Array relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Invasion of Ixalan // Belligerent Regisaur relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Invasion of Belenon // Belenon War Anthem relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Invasion of Moag // Bloomwielder Dryads relevance 0.13 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.10 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.32 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Restless Prairie relevance 0.27 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.27 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.24 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Vastwood Fortification // Vastwood Thicket relevance 0.28 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.26 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Animal Sanctuary relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.24 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.25 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.16 · 43.8% (28 of 64 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.16 · 45.3% (29 of 64 decks)
- Sandstone Bridge relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.21 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.19 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.18 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.22 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.18 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Drannith Ruins relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Idyllic Grange relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Makindi Stampede // Makindi Mesas relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.17 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.17 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Guildmages' Forum relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.14 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.15 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Bretagard Stronghold relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.15 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.15 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.18 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.15 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Botanical Plaza relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.16 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.14 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Suburban Sanctuary relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Secluded Steppe relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.16 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.15 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
All lands (50)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.21 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Etched Cornfield relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.19 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.16 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.17 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.18 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.20 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.19 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.18 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.18 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.13 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.15 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Unclaimed Territory relevance 0.18 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.11 · 42.2% (27 of 64 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.14 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.16 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.11 · 32.8% (21 of 64 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.10 · 50.0% (32 of 64 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.11 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.14 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.13 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.10 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.09 · 35.9% (23 of 64 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.08 · 40.6% (26 of 64 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.13 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.07 · 54.7% (35 of 64 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.13 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.12 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.12 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 0.17 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Vec Townships relevance 0.17 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Shimmering Grotto relevance 0.17 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Tarnation Vista relevance 0.16 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Cryptic Spires relevance 0.16 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.05 · 67.2% (43 of 64 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.05 · 60.9% (39 of 64 decks)
- Ruins of Trokair relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Obscura Storefront relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Sovereign Okinec Ahau, from 64 real Commander decks.