Magus of the Order
Played in 204 Selesnya decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (7)
- Saffi Eriksdotter relevance 0.72 · 1.1% (4 of 353 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Flaming Fist relevance 0.65 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Asmira, Holy Avenger relevance 0.60 · 1.1% (3 of 283 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Folk Hero relevance 0.51 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Othelm, Sigardian Outcast relevance 0.38 · 2.1% (1 of 47 decks)
- Lulu, Loyal Hollyphant // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.37 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Alharu, Solemn Ritualist relevance 0.36 · 1.8% (1 of 57 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.79 · 20.1% (41 of 204 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.62 · 25.0% (51 of 204 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.60 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.58 · 29.4% (60 of 204 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.52 · 14.2% (29 of 204 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.50 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.48 · 22.1% (45 of 204 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.48 · 10.8% (22 of 204 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.47 · 30.9% (63 of 204 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.47 · 14.2% (29 of 204 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.47 · 17.2% (35 of 204 decks)
- Selfless Spirit relevance 0.45 · 14.2% (29 of 204 decks)
- Threats Undetected relevance 0.43 · 7.8% (16 of 204 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.43 · 10.8% (22 of 204 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.42 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.42 · 11.8% (24 of 204 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.42 · 10.3% (21 of 204 decks)
- Village Bell-Ringer relevance 0.42 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.42 · 9.3% (19 of 204 decks)
- Torens, Fist of the Angels relevance 0.40 · 13.7% (28 of 204 decks)
- The Huntsman's Redemption relevance 0.40 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
- Dollhouse of Horrors relevance 0.40 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
- Cathar Commando relevance 0.40 · 10.8% (22 of 204 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.39 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.39 · 10.8% (22 of 204 decks)
- Instrument of the Bards relevance 0.38 · 6.4% (13 of 204 decks)
- Hornet Queen relevance 0.38 · 10.3% (21 of 204 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.37 · 9.3% (19 of 204 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.36 · 11.8% (24 of 204 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.36 · 20.6% (42 of 204 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.79 · 20.1% (41 of 204 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.62 · 25.0% (51 of 204 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.60 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.58 · 29.4% (60 of 204 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.48 · 22.1% (45 of 204 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.47 · 30.9% (63 of 204 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.47 · 14.2% (29 of 204 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.47 · 17.2% (35 of 204 decks)
- Selfless Spirit relevance 0.45 · 14.2% (29 of 204 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.43 · 10.8% (22 of 204 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.42 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.42 · 11.8% (24 of 204 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.42 · 10.3% (21 of 204 decks)
- Village Bell-Ringer relevance 0.42 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.42 · 9.3% (19 of 204 decks)
- Torens, Fist of the Angels relevance 0.40 · 13.7% (28 of 204 decks)
- Cathar Commando relevance 0.40 · 10.8% (22 of 204 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.39 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Hornet Queen relevance 0.38 · 10.3% (21 of 204 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.36 · 11.8% (24 of 204 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.36 · 20.6% (42 of 204 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.36 · 7.4% (15 of 204 decks)
- Cataclysmic Gearhulk relevance 0.36 · 6.4% (13 of 204 decks)
- Brigid, Clachan's Heart // Brigid, Doun's Mind relevance 0.35 · 11.8% (24 of 204 decks)
- Moon-Blessed Cleric relevance 0.35 · 10.3% (21 of 204 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.35 · 6.9% (14 of 204 decks)
- Karmic Guide relevance 0.35 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
- Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 0.35 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Protean Hulk relevance 0.34 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Dollhouse of Horrors relevance 0.40 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.39 · 10.8% (22 of 204 decks)
- Instrument of the Bards relevance 0.38 · 6.4% (13 of 204 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Gift relevance 0.36 · 5.4% (11 of 204 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- The Huntsman's Redemption relevance 0.40 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
- Séance relevance 0.36 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
All instants (2)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.48 · 10.8% (22 of 204 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.34 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.52 · 14.2% (29 of 204 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.50 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Threats Undetected relevance 0.43 · 7.8% (16 of 204 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.37 · 9.3% (19 of 204 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 0.34 · 6.4% (13 of 204 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.38 · 20.6% (42 of 204 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.37 · 29.4% (60 of 204 decks)
- Windbrisk Heights relevance 0.37 · 11.8% (24 of 204 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.35 · 9.8% (20 of 204 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.34 · 12.3% (25 of 204 decks)
All lands (3)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.41 · 30.9% (63 of 204 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.40 · 17.6% (36 of 204 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.38 · 21.1% (43 of 204 decks)
EDH data for Magus of the Order: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 204 real decks.