Yavimaya Granger
Played in 130 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (8)
- Vaevictis Asmadi relevance 1.85 · 4.8% (9 of 186 decks)
- Gyrus, Waker of Corpses relevance 1.69 · 2.0% (13 of 653 decks)
- Adun Oakenshield relevance 1.53 · 3.4% (7 of 206 decks)
- Darigaaz, the Igniter relevance 1.47 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Sek'Kuar, Deathkeeper relevance 1.31 · 1.2% (10 of 848 decks)
- Xira Arien relevance 1.22 · 1.9% (6 of 318 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.81 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower // Keskit, the Flesh Sculptor relevance 0.41 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Wood Elves relevance 2.01 · 54.6% (71 of 130 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 1.79 · 41.5% (54 of 130 decks)
- Dawntreader Elk relevance 1.21 · 20.8% (27 of 130 decks)
- Diligent Farmhand relevance 1.06 · 16.9% (22 of 130 decks)
- Shriekmaw relevance 0.98 · 21.5% (28 of 130 decks)
- Yavimaya Dryad relevance 0.86 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.84 · 20.8% (27 of 130 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.83 · 17.7% (23 of 130 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.79 · 53.8% (70 of 130 decks)
- Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru relevance 0.78 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Fires of Yavimaya relevance 0.74 · 16.9% (22 of 130 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.74 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Primal Growth relevance 0.66 · 12.3% (16 of 130 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.64 · 17.7% (23 of 130 decks)
- Evolutionary Leap relevance 0.64 · 16.9% (22 of 130 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.64 · 25.4% (33 of 130 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.64 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Ravenous Chupacabra relevance 0.63 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Verdant Force relevance 0.63 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Plaguecrafter relevance 0.62 · 16.2% (21 of 130 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 0.61 · 12.3% (16 of 130 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.61 · 30.0% (39 of 130 decks)
- Summon: Fenrir relevance 0.60 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Decree of Pain relevance 0.59 · 12.3% (16 of 130 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.56 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Clifftop Lookout relevance 0.55 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.54 · 12.3% (16 of 130 decks)
- Genesis relevance 0.53 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Pawn of Ulamog relevance 0.52 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.52 · 16.2% (21 of 130 decks)
All creatures (33)
- Wood Elves relevance 2.01 · 54.6% (71 of 130 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 1.79 · 41.5% (54 of 130 decks)
- Dawntreader Elk relevance 1.21 · 20.8% (27 of 130 decks)
- Diligent Farmhand relevance 1.06 · 16.9% (22 of 130 decks)
- Shriekmaw relevance 0.98 · 21.5% (28 of 130 decks)
- Yavimaya Dryad relevance 0.86 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.84 · 20.8% (27 of 130 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.83 · 17.7% (23 of 130 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.79 · 53.8% (70 of 130 decks)
- Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru relevance 0.78 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.74 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.64 · 17.7% (23 of 130 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.64 · 25.4% (33 of 130 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.64 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Ravenous Chupacabra relevance 0.63 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Verdant Force relevance 0.63 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Plaguecrafter relevance 0.62 · 16.2% (21 of 130 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 0.61 · 12.3% (16 of 130 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.61 · 30.0% (39 of 130 decks)
- Summon: Fenrir relevance 0.60 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.56 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Clifftop Lookout relevance 0.55 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Genesis relevance 0.53 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Pawn of Ulamog relevance 0.52 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Carrion Feeder relevance 0.52 · 14.6% (19 of 130 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.51 · 29.2% (38 of 130 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.49 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.48 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Hell's Caretaker relevance 0.47 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Grim Haruspex relevance 0.46 · 12.3% (16 of 130 decks)
- Smothering Abomination relevance 0.46 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.46 · 23.1% (30 of 130 decks)
- Doomed Necromancer relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Fires of Yavimaya relevance 0.74 · 16.9% (22 of 130 decks)
- Evolutionary Leap relevance 0.64 · 16.9% (22 of 130 decks)
- Pernicious Deed relevance 0.52 · 10.8% (14 of 130 decks)
- Moldervine Reclamation relevance 0.50 · 16.9% (22 of 130 decks)
- Goblin Bombardment relevance 0.46 · 19.2% (25 of 130 decks)
- Grim Feast relevance 0.46 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Primal Growth relevance 0.66 · 12.3% (16 of 130 decks)
- Decree of Pain relevance 0.59 · 12.3% (16 of 130 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.54 · 12.3% (16 of 130 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.52 · 16.2% (21 of 130 decks)
- Living Death relevance 0.51 · 19.2% (25 of 130 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.51 · 28.5% (37 of 130 decks)
- Ancient Craving relevance 0.46 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
All lands (4)
- Jund Panorama relevance 0.47 · 13.8% (18 of 130 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.47 · 13.8% (18 of 130 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.47 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Bloodfell Caves relevance 0.46 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
EDH data for Yavimaya Granger: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 130 real decks.