Nessian Wilds Ravager
Played in 201 Selesnya decks
Color Identity Spread
5.4% Selesnya
-
Green 1,864 · 50.4%
-
Gruul 920 · 24.9%
-
Selesnya 201 · 5.4%
-
Sultai 157 · 4.2%
-
Simic 143 · 3.9%
-
Five-Color 88 · 2.4%
- Other (11) 329 · 8.9%
330+41+1+3+2+1+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Polukranos Reborn // Polukranos, Engine of Ruin relevance 3.88 · 8.5% (122 of 1,433 decks)
- Kei Takahashi relevance 0.52 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 0.41 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Gargos, Vicious Watcher relevance 2.90 · 56.7% (114 of 201 decks)
- Scourge of Skola Vale relevance 2.44 · 40.8% (82 of 201 decks)
- Polukranos, World Eater relevance 2.42 · 39.8% (80 of 201 decks)
- Ironscale Hydra relevance 2.35 · 41.3% (83 of 201 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 2.28 · 53.2% (107 of 201 decks)
- Hungering Hydra relevance 2.22 · 49.3% (99 of 201 decks)
- Rampant Rejuvenator relevance 2.13 · 44.8% (90 of 201 decks)
- Vastwood Hydra relevance 2.13 · 44.3% (89 of 201 decks)
- Hydra Omnivore relevance 2.07 · 38.3% (77 of 201 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 2.06 · 39.8% (80 of 201 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 2.00 · 37.8% (76 of 201 decks)
- Oran-Rief Hydra relevance 1.97 · 36.8% (74 of 201 decks)
- Hooded Hydra relevance 1.95 · 42.8% (86 of 201 decks)
- Heroes' Bane relevance 1.94 · 35.8% (72 of 201 decks)
- Mistcutter Hydra relevance 1.91 · 41.3% (83 of 201 decks)
- Lifeblood Hydra relevance 1.90 · 41.8% (84 of 201 decks)
- Whiptongue Hydra relevance 1.81 · 31.8% (64 of 201 decks)
- Phytohydra relevance 1.81 · 34.8% (70 of 201 decks)
- Primordial Hydra relevance 1.79 · 40.8% (82 of 201 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 1.73 · 56.2% (113 of 201 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 1.72 · 39.3% (79 of 201 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 1.68 · 43.8% (88 of 201 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 1.68 · 48.3% (97 of 201 decks)
- Wren's Run Hydra relevance 1.66 · 33.8% (68 of 201 decks)
- Voracious Hydra relevance 1.63 · 35.8% (72 of 201 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 1.61 · 47.8% (96 of 201 decks)
- Capricopian relevance 1.57 · 31.8% (64 of 201 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 1.48 · 30.3% (61 of 201 decks)
- Khalni Hydra relevance 1.44 · 21.9% (44 of 201 decks)
- Feral Hydra relevance 1.43 · 28.9% (58 of 201 decks)
All creatures (41)
- Gargos, Vicious Watcher relevance 2.90 · 56.7% (114 of 201 decks)
- Scourge of Skola Vale relevance 2.44 · 40.8% (82 of 201 decks)
- Polukranos, World Eater relevance 2.42 · 39.8% (80 of 201 decks)
- Ironscale Hydra relevance 2.35 · 41.3% (83 of 201 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 2.28 · 53.2% (107 of 201 decks)
- Hungering Hydra relevance 2.22 · 49.3% (99 of 201 decks)
- Rampant Rejuvenator relevance 2.13 · 44.8% (90 of 201 decks)
- Vastwood Hydra relevance 2.13 · 44.3% (89 of 201 decks)
- Hydra Omnivore relevance 2.07 · 38.3% (77 of 201 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 2.06 · 39.8% (80 of 201 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 2.00 · 37.8% (76 of 201 decks)
- Oran-Rief Hydra relevance 1.97 · 36.8% (74 of 201 decks)
- Hooded Hydra relevance 1.95 · 42.8% (86 of 201 decks)
- Heroes' Bane relevance 1.94 · 35.8% (72 of 201 decks)
- Mistcutter Hydra relevance 1.91 · 41.3% (83 of 201 decks)
- Lifeblood Hydra relevance 1.90 · 41.8% (84 of 201 decks)
- Whiptongue Hydra relevance 1.81 · 31.8% (64 of 201 decks)
- Phytohydra relevance 1.81 · 34.8% (70 of 201 decks)
- Primordial Hydra relevance 1.79 · 40.8% (82 of 201 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 1.73 · 56.2% (113 of 201 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 1.72 · 39.3% (79 of 201 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 1.68 · 43.8% (88 of 201 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 1.68 · 48.3% (97 of 201 decks)
- Wren's Run Hydra relevance 1.66 · 33.8% (68 of 201 decks)
- Voracious Hydra relevance 1.63 · 35.8% (72 of 201 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 1.61 · 47.8% (96 of 201 decks)
- Capricopian relevance 1.57 · 31.8% (64 of 201 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 1.48 · 30.3% (61 of 201 decks)
- Khalni Hydra relevance 1.44 · 21.9% (44 of 201 decks)
- Feral Hydra relevance 1.43 · 28.9% (58 of 201 decks)
- Neverwinter Hydra relevance 1.40 · 27.9% (56 of 201 decks)
- Benevolent Hydra relevance 1.39 · 31.3% (63 of 201 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.38 · 37.8% (76 of 201 decks)
- Protean Hydra relevance 1.34 · 27.4% (55 of 201 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 1.25 · 35.3% (71 of 201 decks)
- Stumpsquall Hydra relevance 1.23 · 18.9% (38 of 201 decks)
- Briar Hydra relevance 1.12 · 16.4% (33 of 201 decks)
- Rampaging Aetherhood relevance 1.11 · 16.9% (34 of 201 decks)
- Nyxborn Hydra relevance 1.10 · 28.4% (57 of 201 decks)
- Luminous Broodmoth relevance 0.76 · 20.4% (41 of 201 decks)
- Nexos relevance 0.73 · 10.9% (22 of 201 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Elementalist's Palette relevance 0.72 · 11.4% (23 of 201 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 0.99 · 17.9% (36 of 201 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.87 · 40.3% (81 of 201 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.67 · 16.4% (33 of 201 decks)
All instants (2)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.68 · 28.9% (58 of 201 decks)
- Rally the Ancestors relevance 0.57 · 10.4% (21 of 201 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.55 · 42.3% (85 of 201 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 1.32 · 30.3% (61 of 201 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.65 · 20.4% (41 of 201 decks)
EDH data for Nessian Wilds Ravager: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 201 real decks.

































