Nessian Wilds Ravager
Played in 143 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
3.8% Simic
-
Green 1,872 · 50.4%
-
Gruul 923 · 24.8%
-
Selesnya 202 · 5.4%
-
Sultai 159 · 4.3%
-
Simic 143 · 3.8%
-
Five-Color 88 · 2.4%
- Other (11) 329 · 8.9%
230+43+2+1+1+3+
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.71 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.55 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Gargos, Vicious Watcher relevance 1.19 · 22.4% (32 of 143 decks)
- Heroes' Bane relevance 1.19 · 21.7% (31 of 143 decks)
- Polukranos, World Eater relevance 0.91 · 13.3% (19 of 143 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 0.87 · 22.4% (32 of 143 decks)
- Mistcutter Hydra relevance 0.87 · 16.8% (24 of 143 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 0.79 · 18.9% (27 of 143 decks)
- Vastwood Hydra relevance 0.74 · 14.0% (20 of 143 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 0.73 · 17.5% (25 of 143 decks)
- Protean Hydra relevance 0.72 · 13.3% (19 of 143 decks)
- Whiptongue Hydra relevance 0.69 · 11.2% (16 of 143 decks)
- Nyxborn Hydra relevance 0.68 · 16.8% (24 of 143 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.67 · 20.3% (29 of 143 decks)
- Ironscale Hydra relevance 0.63 · 9.8% (14 of 143 decks)
- Oran-Rief Hydra relevance 0.61 · 11.9% (17 of 143 decks)
- Hydra Omnivore relevance 0.60 · 14.7% (21 of 143 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.58 · 14.0% (20 of 143 decks)
- Hooded Hydra relevance 0.56 · 11.9% (17 of 143 decks)
- Hungering Hydra relevance 0.56 · 12.6% (18 of 143 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.52 · 15.4% (22 of 143 decks)
- Wren's Run Hydra relevance 0.50 · 8.4% (12 of 143 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.50 · 27.3% (39 of 143 decks)
- Voracious Hydra relevance 0.49 · 13.3% (19 of 143 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.49 · 16.8% (24 of 143 decks)
- Primordial Hydra relevance 0.48 · 18.2% (26 of 143 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.48 · 16.1% (23 of 143 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.46 · 9.8% (14 of 143 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.46 · 14.0% (20 of 143 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.45 · 13.3% (19 of 143 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.45 · 16.1% (23 of 143 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.44 · 18.9% (27 of 143 decks)
All creatures (43)
- Gargos, Vicious Watcher relevance 1.19 · 22.4% (32 of 143 decks)
- Heroes' Bane relevance 1.19 · 21.7% (31 of 143 decks)
- Polukranos, World Eater relevance 0.91 · 13.3% (19 of 143 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 0.87 · 22.4% (32 of 143 decks)
- Mistcutter Hydra relevance 0.87 · 16.8% (24 of 143 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 0.79 · 18.9% (27 of 143 decks)
- Vastwood Hydra relevance 0.74 · 14.0% (20 of 143 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 0.73 · 17.5% (25 of 143 decks)
- Protean Hydra relevance 0.72 · 13.3% (19 of 143 decks)
- Whiptongue Hydra relevance 0.69 · 11.2% (16 of 143 decks)
- Nyxborn Hydra relevance 0.68 · 16.8% (24 of 143 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.67 · 20.3% (29 of 143 decks)
- Ironscale Hydra relevance 0.63 · 9.8% (14 of 143 decks)
- Oran-Rief Hydra relevance 0.61 · 11.9% (17 of 143 decks)
- Hydra Omnivore relevance 0.60 · 14.7% (21 of 143 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.58 · 14.0% (20 of 143 decks)
- Hooded Hydra relevance 0.56 · 11.9% (17 of 143 decks)
- Hungering Hydra relevance 0.56 · 12.6% (18 of 143 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.52 · 15.4% (22 of 143 decks)
- Wren's Run Hydra relevance 0.50 · 8.4% (12 of 143 decks)
- Voracious Hydra relevance 0.49 · 13.3% (19 of 143 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.49 · 16.8% (24 of 143 decks)
- Primordial Hydra relevance 0.48 · 18.2% (26 of 143 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.48 · 16.1% (23 of 143 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.46 · 9.8% (14 of 143 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.46 · 14.0% (20 of 143 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.45 · 13.3% (19 of 143 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.45 · 16.1% (23 of 143 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.44 · 18.9% (27 of 143 decks)
- Nimbus Swimmer relevance 0.44 · 9.1% (13 of 143 decks)
- Murkfiend Liege relevance 0.43 · 18.9% (27 of 143 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.42 · 12.6% (18 of 143 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.42 · 9.8% (14 of 143 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 0.42 · 15.4% (22 of 143 decks)
- Elusive Krasis relevance 0.42 · 8.4% (12 of 143 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 0.42 · 15.4% (22 of 143 decks)
- Quirion Beastcaller relevance 0.41 · 7.0% (10 of 143 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.40 · 11.2% (16 of 143 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.40 · 12.6% (18 of 143 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.40 · 20.3% (29 of 143 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.40 · 10.5% (15 of 143 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.40 · 18.9% (27 of 143 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.40 · 11.2% (16 of 143 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.50 · 27.3% (39 of 143 decks)
- Market Festival relevance 0.40 · 7.0% (10 of 143 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Unexpected Results relevance 0.41 · 8.4% (12 of 143 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.42 · 16.8% (24 of 143 decks)
All lands (3)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.77 · 38.5% (55 of 143 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.66 · 25.2% (36 of 143 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.60 · 37.1% (53 of 143 decks)
EDH data for Nessian Wilds Ravager: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 143 real decks.































