Coercive Portal
Played in 160 Bant decks
530+18+5+5+6+14+1+1+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Leela, Sevateem Warrior // The Second Doctor 1.9% of decks
Leela, Sevateem Warrior // The Second Doctor 1.9% of decks
The Eighth Doctor // Ace, Fearless Rebel 50.0% of decks
The Eighth Doctor // Ace, Fearless Rebel 50.0% of decks
The Seventh Doctor // Graham O'Brien 16.7% of decks
The Seventh Doctor // Graham O'Brien 16.7% of decks
Susan Foreman // The Second Doctor 1.2% of decks
Susan Foreman // The Second Doctor 1.2% of decks
Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Anara, Wolvid Familiar 1.4% of decks
Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Anara, Wolvid Familiar 1.4% of decks
Most Relevant
Split Decision 58.8% of decks
Split Decision 58.8% of decks
Erestor of the Council 49.4% of decks
Erestor of the Council 49.4% of decks
Plea for Power 51.9% of decks
Plea for Power 51.9% of decks
Sail into the West 51.9% of decks
Sail into the West 51.9% of decks
Model of Unity 44.4% of decks
Model of Unity 44.4% of decks
Council's Judgment 58.8% of decks
Council's Judgment 58.8% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Leela, Sevateem Warrior // The Second Doctor relevance 1.23 · 1.9% (7 of 374 decks)
- The Eighth Doctor // Ace, Fearless Rebel relevance 0.84 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- The Seventh Doctor // Graham O'Brien relevance 0.69 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Second Doctor relevance 0.57 · 1.2% (2 of 162 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.37 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Split Decision relevance 3.48 · 58.8% (94 of 160 decks)
- Erestor of the Council relevance 3.03 · 49.4% (79 of 160 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 2.93 · 51.9% (83 of 160 decks)
- Sail into the West relevance 2.89 · 51.9% (83 of 160 decks)
- Model of Unity relevance 2.87 · 44.4% (71 of 160 decks)
- Council's Judgment relevance 2.87 · 58.8% (94 of 160 decks)
- Círdan the Shipwright relevance 2.68 · 53.8% (86 of 160 decks)
- Trap the Trespassers relevance 2.56 · 45.0% (72 of 160 decks)
- Elrond of the White Council relevance 2.52 · 47.5% (76 of 160 decks)
- Emissary Green relevance 2.47 · 40.6% (65 of 160 decks)
- Selvala's Stampede relevance 2.44 · 40.6% (65 of 160 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 2.41 · 41.3% (66 of 160 decks)
- Travel Through Caradhras relevance 2.40 · 36.3% (58 of 160 decks)
- Master of Ceremonies relevance 1.48 · 33.1% (53 of 160 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.26 · 50.0% (80 of 160 decks)
- Galadriel, Elven-Queen relevance 1.17 · 22.5% (36 of 160 decks)
- Gluntch, the Bestower relevance 1.08 · 36.3% (58 of 160 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 1.03 · 21.3% (34 of 160 decks)
- Trial of a Time Lord relevance 0.99 · 18.8% (30 of 160 decks)
- Wedding Ring relevance 0.95 · 28.1% (45 of 160 decks)
- Orzhov Advokist relevance 0.95 · 20.0% (32 of 160 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.92 · 19.4% (31 of 160 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 0.91 · 21.9% (35 of 160 decks)
- Nils, Discipline Enforcer relevance 0.87 · 21.9% (35 of 160 decks)
- Tempt with Reflections relevance 0.80 · 13.1% (21 of 160 decks)
- Tempt with Bunnies relevance 0.80 · 28.7% (46 of 160 decks)
- Selvala, Explorer Returned relevance 0.78 · 32.5% (52 of 160 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.74 · 13.1% (21 of 160 decks)
- Kwain, Itinerant Meddler relevance 0.71 · 27.5% (44 of 160 decks)
- Wrong Turn relevance 0.69 · 10.6% (17 of 160 decks)
All creatures (18)
- Erestor of the Council relevance 3.03 · 49.4% (79 of 160 decks)
- Círdan the Shipwright relevance 2.68 · 53.8% (86 of 160 decks)
- Elrond of the White Council relevance 2.52 · 47.5% (76 of 160 decks)
- Emissary Green relevance 2.47 · 40.6% (65 of 160 decks)
- Master of Ceremonies relevance 1.48 · 33.1% (53 of 160 decks)
- Galadriel, Elven-Queen relevance 1.17 · 22.5% (36 of 160 decks)
- Gluntch, the Bestower relevance 1.08 · 36.3% (58 of 160 decks)
- Orzhov Advokist relevance 0.95 · 20.0% (32 of 160 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 0.91 · 21.9% (35 of 160 decks)
- Nils, Discipline Enforcer relevance 0.87 · 21.9% (35 of 160 decks)
- Selvala, Explorer Returned relevance 0.78 · 32.5% (52 of 160 decks)
- Kwain, Itinerant Meddler relevance 0.71 · 27.5% (44 of 160 decks)
- Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.60 · 15.0% (24 of 160 decks)
- Loran of the Third Path relevance 0.58 · 27.5% (44 of 160 decks)
- Gwafa Hazid, Profiteer relevance 0.51 · 8.8% (14 of 160 decks)
- Druid of Purification relevance 0.50 · 11.3% (18 of 160 decks)
- The Council of Four relevance 0.50 · 15.0% (24 of 160 decks)
- Heartwood Storyteller relevance 0.49 · 10.0% (16 of 160 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Model of Unity relevance 2.87 · 44.4% (71 of 160 decks)
- Wedding Ring relevance 0.95 · 28.1% (45 of 160 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.68 · 18.8% (30 of 160 decks)
- Tempting Contract relevance 0.55 · 9.4% (15 of 160 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.53 · 31.3% (50 of 160 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Trial of a Time Lord relevance 0.99 · 18.8% (30 of 160 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.68 · 25.0% (40 of 160 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.60 · 25.0% (40 of 160 decks)
- Tenuous Truce relevance 0.57 · 18.1% (29 of 160 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.52 · 13.1% (21 of 160 decks)
All instants (6)
- Split Decision relevance 3.48 · 58.8% (94 of 160 decks)
- Sail into the West relevance 2.89 · 51.9% (83 of 160 decks)
- Trap the Trespassers relevance 2.56 · 45.0% (72 of 160 decks)
- Wrong Turn relevance 0.69 · 10.6% (17 of 160 decks)
- Everybody Lives! relevance 0.57 · 14.4% (23 of 160 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.53 · 11.9% (19 of 160 decks)
All sorceries (14)
- Plea for Power relevance 2.93 · 51.9% (83 of 160 decks)
- Council's Judgment relevance 2.87 · 58.8% (94 of 160 decks)
- Selvala's Stampede relevance 2.44 · 40.6% (65 of 160 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 2.41 · 41.3% (66 of 160 decks)
- Travel Through Caradhras relevance 2.40 · 36.3% (58 of 160 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.26 · 50.0% (80 of 160 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 1.03 · 21.3% (34 of 160 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.92 · 19.4% (31 of 160 decks)
- Tempt with Reflections relevance 0.80 · 13.1% (21 of 160 decks)
- Tempt with Bunnies relevance 0.80 · 28.7% (46 of 160 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.74 · 13.1% (21 of 160 decks)
- Fractured Identity relevance 0.63 · 13.8% (22 of 160 decks)
- Cut a Deal relevance 0.52 · 12.5% (20 of 160 decks)
- Promise of Loyalty relevance 0.51 · 23.8% (38 of 160 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.70 · 16.3% (26 of 160 decks)
All lands (1)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.63 · 15.6% (25 of 160 decks)
EDH data for Coercive Portal: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 160 real decks.
















































