Subjugate the Hobbits
Played in 384 Esper decks
430+26+2+5+5+11+1+
Color Identity Spread
3.7% Esper
Commanders
Most Relevant
Gríma, Saruman's Footman 40.6% of decks
Gríma, Saruman's Footman 40.6% of decks
Hostage Taker 40.1% of decks
Hostage Taker 40.1% of decks
Extract from Darkness 31.5% of decks
Extract from Darkness 31.5% of decks
Storm of Saruman 34.6% of decks
Storm of Saruman 34.6% of decks
Mind Flayer 25.3% of decks
Mind Flayer 25.3% of decks
Thieving Amalgam 22.1% of decks
Thieving Amalgam 22.1% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Nihiloor relevance 3.54 · 12.8% (63 of 493 decks)
- Saruman of Many Colors relevance 3.22 · 4.2% (147 of 3,542 decks)
- Sen Triplets relevance 2.20 · 1.9% (81 of 4,351 decks)
- Lady Evangela relevance 0.30 · 1.3% (1 of 78 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Gríma, Saruman's Footman relevance 1.74 · 40.6% (156 of 384 decks)
- Hostage Taker relevance 1.67 · 40.1% (154 of 384 decks)
- Extract from Darkness relevance 1.63 · 31.5% (121 of 384 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 1.48 · 34.6% (133 of 384 decks)
- Mind Flayer relevance 1.39 · 25.3% (97 of 384 decks)
- Thieving Amalgam relevance 1.34 · 22.1% (85 of 384 decks)
- Saruman the White relevance 1.30 · 22.7% (87 of 384 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 1.29 · 23.4% (90 of 384 decks)
- Saruman's Trickery relevance 1.22 · 20.6% (79 of 384 decks)
- Extract Brain relevance 1.22 · 22.7% (87 of 384 decks)
- Gonti, Lord of Luxury relevance 1.21 · 26.3% (101 of 384 decks)
- Siphon Insight relevance 1.18 · 22.7% (87 of 384 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 1.17 · 18.5% (71 of 384 decks)
- Control Magic relevance 1.17 · 23.7% (91 of 384 decks)
- Thief of Sanity relevance 1.16 · 32.3% (124 of 384 decks)
- Elder Brain relevance 1.16 · 22.1% (85 of 384 decks)
- Sorcerous Squall relevance 1.12 · 20.8% (80 of 384 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 1.08 · 22.4% (86 of 384 decks)
- Xanathar, Guild Kingpin relevance 1.07 · 21.9% (84 of 384 decks)
- Mind Control relevance 1.03 · 17.2% (66 of 384 decks)
- Nightveil Specter relevance 1.03 · 19.3% (74 of 384 decks)
- Beguiler of Wills relevance 1.03 · 16.4% (63 of 384 decks)
- Intellect Devourer relevance 1.02 · 16.4% (63 of 384 decks)
- Shadow of the Enemy relevance 0.99 · 15.4% (59 of 384 decks)
- Palantír of Orthanc relevance 0.98 · 21.6% (83 of 384 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.98 · 24.2% (93 of 384 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.97 · 19.0% (73 of 384 decks)
- Tasha, the Witch Queen relevance 0.97 · 20.6% (79 of 384 decks)
- Brainstealer Dragon relevance 0.97 · 18.2% (70 of 384 decks)
- Lord of the Nazgûl relevance 0.94 · 16.1% (62 of 384 decks)
All creatures (26)
- Gríma, Saruman's Footman relevance 1.74 · 40.6% (156 of 384 decks)
- Hostage Taker relevance 1.67 · 40.1% (154 of 384 decks)
- Mind Flayer relevance 1.39 · 25.3% (97 of 384 decks)
- Thieving Amalgam relevance 1.34 · 22.1% (85 of 384 decks)
- Saruman the White relevance 1.30 · 22.7% (87 of 384 decks)
- Gonti, Lord of Luxury relevance 1.21 · 26.3% (101 of 384 decks)
- Thief of Sanity relevance 1.16 · 32.3% (124 of 384 decks)
- Elder Brain relevance 1.16 · 22.1% (85 of 384 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 1.08 · 22.4% (86 of 384 decks)
- Xanathar, Guild Kingpin relevance 1.07 · 21.9% (84 of 384 decks)
- Nightveil Specter relevance 1.03 · 19.3% (74 of 384 decks)
- Beguiler of Wills relevance 1.03 · 16.4% (63 of 384 decks)
- Intellect Devourer relevance 1.02 · 16.4% (63 of 384 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.98 · 24.2% (93 of 384 decks)
- Brainstealer Dragon relevance 0.97 · 18.2% (70 of 384 decks)
- Lord of the Nazgûl relevance 0.94 · 16.1% (62 of 384 decks)
- The Mouth of Sauron relevance 0.92 · 14.3% (55 of 384 decks)
- Gandalf, Friend of the Shire relevance 0.86 · 14.6% (56 of 384 decks)
- Notion Thief relevance 0.82 · 28.6% (110 of 384 decks)
- Consuming Aberration relevance 0.80 · 18.8% (72 of 384 decks)
- Captain N'ghathrod relevance 0.77 · 12.2% (47 of 384 decks)
- Vega, the Watcher relevance 0.76 · 20.6% (79 of 384 decks)
- Arvinox, the Mind Flail relevance 0.76 · 16.7% (64 of 384 decks)
- Lobelia Sackville-Baggins relevance 0.75 · 12.5% (48 of 384 decks)
- Nihiloor relevance 0.72 · 13.5% (52 of 384 decks)
- Daxos of Meletis relevance 0.71 · 14.8% (57 of 384 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Palantír of Orthanc relevance 0.98 · 21.6% (83 of 384 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.71 · 35.4% (136 of 384 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 1.48 · 34.6% (133 of 384 decks)
- Control Magic relevance 1.17 · 23.7% (91 of 384 decks)
- Mind Control relevance 1.03 · 17.2% (66 of 384 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 0.89 · 17.7% (68 of 384 decks)
- One Ring to Rule Them All relevance 0.75 · 12.2% (47 of 384 decks)
All instants (5)
- Saruman's Trickery relevance 1.22 · 20.6% (79 of 384 decks)
- Siphon Insight relevance 1.18 · 22.7% (87 of 384 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.91 · 23.4% (90 of 384 decks)
- Press the Enemy relevance 0.81 · 20.8% (80 of 384 decks)
- Memory Plunder relevance 0.79 · 16.1% (62 of 384 decks)
All sorceries (11)
- Extract from Darkness relevance 1.63 · 31.5% (121 of 384 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 1.29 · 23.4% (90 of 384 decks)
- Extract Brain relevance 1.22 · 22.7% (87 of 384 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 1.17 · 18.5% (71 of 384 decks)
- Sorcerous Squall relevance 1.12 · 20.8% (80 of 384 decks)
- Shadow of the Enemy relevance 0.99 · 15.4% (59 of 384 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.97 · 19.0% (73 of 384 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.94 · 16.4% (63 of 384 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.91 · 20.6% (79 of 384 decks)
- Treason of Isengard relevance 0.91 · 13.5% (52 of 384 decks)
- Ringsight relevance 0.76 · 17.7% (68 of 384 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tasha, the Witch Queen relevance 0.97 · 20.6% (79 of 384 decks)
EDH data for Subjugate the Hobbits: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 384 real decks.














































