Subjugate the Hobbits
Played in 235 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
2.3% Azorius
630+5+3+10+5+25+1+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (6)
- Rasputin, the Oneiromancer relevance 3.31 · 13.3% (44 of 331 decks)
- Elminster relevance 1.87 · 1.5% (50 of 3,246 decks)
- Nyssa of Traken // The Seventh Doctor relevance 0.48 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg // The Fifth Doctor relevance 0.41 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Dragon Man, Reformed Robot relevance 0.38 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- The Seventh Doctor // Clara Oswald relevance 0.31 · 1.3% (1 of 76 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 1.08 · 19.1% (45 of 235 decks)
- Naban, Dean of Iteration relevance 0.93 · 19.6% (46 of 235 decks)
- Absolute Law relevance 0.90 · 14.9% (35 of 235 decks)
- Teferi's Moat relevance 0.88 · 15.3% (36 of 235 decks)
- Storm Herd relevance 0.85 · 26.0% (61 of 235 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.85 · 18.7% (44 of 235 decks)
- Vanish into Memory relevance 0.85 · 16.2% (38 of 235 decks)
- Hunted Phantasm relevance 0.82 · 12.3% (29 of 235 decks)
- Reverse the Sands relevance 0.80 · 11.9% (28 of 235 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.76 · 16.2% (38 of 235 decks)
- Oath of Teferi relevance 0.75 · 18.7% (44 of 235 decks)
- Sorcerous Squall relevance 0.74 · 11.5% (27 of 235 decks)
- Ugin's Insight relevance 0.74 · 16.2% (38 of 235 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.73 · 21.3% (50 of 235 decks)
- Crafty Cutpurse relevance 0.73 · 11.5% (27 of 235 decks)
- Tamiyo's Epiphany relevance 0.72 · 16.2% (38 of 235 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.71 · 16.6% (39 of 235 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.70 · 15.7% (37 of 235 decks)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.70 · 18.7% (44 of 235 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.68 · 31.9% (75 of 235 decks)
- Foresee relevance 0.67 · 15.7% (37 of 235 decks)
- Far Traveler relevance 0.67 · 16.6% (39 of 235 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.66 · 18.3% (43 of 235 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.66 · 12.8% (30 of 235 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.66 · 11.9% (28 of 235 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.65 · 21.7% (51 of 235 decks)
- Suture Priest relevance 0.64 · 17.9% (42 of 235 decks)
- Mystic Speculation relevance 0.64 · 16.6% (39 of 235 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 0.63 · 10.2% (24 of 235 decks)
- Devout Invocation relevance 0.63 · 10.6% (25 of 235 decks)
All creatures (5)
- Naban, Dean of Iteration relevance 0.93 · 19.6% (46 of 235 decks)
- Hunted Phantasm relevance 0.82 · 12.3% (29 of 235 decks)
- Crafty Cutpurse relevance 0.73 · 11.5% (27 of 235 decks)
- Suture Priest relevance 0.64 · 17.9% (42 of 235 decks)
- Scuttlemutt relevance 0.57 · 8.5% (20 of 235 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.66 · 18.3% (43 of 235 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.61 · 17.4% (41 of 235 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.57 · 13.6% (32 of 235 decks)
All enchantments (10)
- Absolute Law relevance 0.90 · 14.9% (35 of 235 decks)
- Teferi's Moat relevance 0.88 · 15.3% (36 of 235 decks)
- Oath of Teferi relevance 0.75 · 18.7% (44 of 235 decks)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.70 · 18.7% (44 of 235 decks)
- Far Traveler relevance 0.67 · 16.6% (39 of 235 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.66 · 11.9% (28 of 235 decks)
- Lost Isle Calling relevance 0.62 · 13.6% (32 of 235 decks)
- Tale of Tinúviel relevance 0.60 · 9.4% (22 of 235 decks)
- Call for Unity relevance 0.59 · 10.2% (24 of 235 decks)
- Intangible Virtue relevance 0.58 · 19.6% (46 of 235 decks)
All instants (5)
- Vanish into Memory relevance 0.85 · 16.2% (38 of 235 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.73 · 21.3% (50 of 235 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.62 · 14.5% (34 of 235 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.59 · 11.9% (28 of 235 decks)
- Test of Talents relevance 0.58 · 8.5% (20 of 235 decks)
All sorceries (25)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 1.08 · 19.1% (45 of 235 decks)
- Storm Herd relevance 0.85 · 26.0% (61 of 235 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.85 · 18.7% (44 of 235 decks)
- Reverse the Sands relevance 0.80 · 11.9% (28 of 235 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.76 · 16.2% (38 of 235 decks)
- Sorcerous Squall relevance 0.74 · 11.5% (27 of 235 decks)
- Ugin's Insight relevance 0.74 · 16.2% (38 of 235 decks)
- Tamiyo's Epiphany relevance 0.72 · 16.2% (38 of 235 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.71 · 16.6% (39 of 235 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.70 · 15.7% (37 of 235 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.68 · 31.9% (75 of 235 decks)
- Foresee relevance 0.67 · 15.7% (37 of 235 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.66 · 12.8% (30 of 235 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.65 · 21.7% (51 of 235 decks)
- Mystic Speculation relevance 0.64 · 16.6% (39 of 235 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 0.63 · 10.2% (24 of 235 decks)
- Devout Invocation relevance 0.63 · 10.6% (25 of 235 decks)
- Sublime Exhalation relevance 0.63 · 9.8% (23 of 235 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.63 · 14.5% (34 of 235 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.63 · 20.4% (48 of 235 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.62 · 17.4% (41 of 235 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.62 · 14.5% (34 of 235 decks)
- Interpret the Signs relevance 0.60 · 11.9% (28 of 235 decks)
- Overflowing Insight relevance 0.60 · 8.9% (21 of 235 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.60 · 13.2% (31 of 235 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Jace, Mirror Mage relevance 0.58 · 14.0% (33 of 235 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.78 · 19.6% (46 of 235 decks)
EDH data for Subjugate the Hobbits: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 235 real decks.





















































