Leaping Ambush
Played in 160 Simic decks
330+18+4+1+20+7+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Alaundo the Seer 5.5% of decks
Alaundo the Seer 5.5% of decks
Raised by Giants // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher 3.1% of decks
Raised by Giants // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher 3.1% of decks
Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Candlekeep Sage 50.0% of decks
Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Candlekeep Sage 50.0% of decks
Most Relevant
High Stride 53.1% of decks
High Stride 53.1% of decks
Arachnoid Adaptation 43.8% of decks
Arachnoid Adaptation 43.8% of decks
Burst of Strength 41.3% of decks
Burst of Strength 41.3% of decks
Stony Strength 36.9% of decks
Stony Strength 36.9% of decks
Gift of the Viper 52.5% of decks
Gift of the Viper 52.5% of decks
Shore Up 53.8% of decks
Shore Up 53.8% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Alaundo the Seer relevance 3.64 · 5.5% (82 of 1,500 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher relevance 1.49 · 3.1% (7 of 226 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.86 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- High Stride relevance 3.48 · 53.1% (85 of 160 decks)
- Arachnoid Adaptation relevance 2.98 · 43.8% (70 of 160 decks)
- Burst of Strength relevance 2.57 · 41.3% (66 of 160 decks)
- Stony Strength relevance 2.35 · 36.9% (59 of 160 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 2.26 · 52.5% (84 of 160 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 2.16 · 53.8% (86 of 160 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 2.11 · 38.8% (62 of 160 decks)
- Twiddle relevance 2.00 · 31.9% (51 of 160 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 1.77 · 38.1% (61 of 160 decks)
- Dream's Grip relevance 1.75 · 25.6% (41 of 160 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 1.75 · 33.8% (54 of 160 decks)
- Pillar Launch relevance 1.63 · 25.0% (40 of 160 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 1.60 · 37.5% (60 of 160 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 1.59 · 33.1% (53 of 160 decks)
- Refocus relevance 1.57 · 26.9% (43 of 160 decks)
- Triton Tactics relevance 1.54 · 22.5% (36 of 160 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 1.48 · 30.6% (49 of 160 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 1.48 · 32.5% (52 of 160 decks)
- Inspiring Refrain relevance 1.48 · 27.5% (44 of 160 decks)
- Venture Forth relevance 1.41 · 25.6% (41 of 160 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 1.35 · 25.6% (41 of 160 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 1.29 · 26.3% (42 of 160 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 1.28 · 26.9% (43 of 160 decks)
- Aeon Chronicler relevance 1.28 · 23.1% (37 of 160 decks)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 1.23 · 25.0% (40 of 160 decks)
- North Pole Patrol relevance 1.23 · 20.6% (33 of 160 decks)
- Instill Energy relevance 1.22 · 23.1% (37 of 160 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 1.22 · 40.0% (64 of 160 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 1.22 · 26.3% (42 of 160 decks)
- Clever Conjurer relevance 1.15 · 20.6% (33 of 160 decks)
All creatures (18)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 1.60 · 37.5% (60 of 160 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 1.48 · 30.6% (49 of 160 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 1.48 · 32.5% (52 of 160 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 1.35 · 25.6% (41 of 160 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 1.29 · 26.3% (42 of 160 decks)
- Aeon Chronicler relevance 1.28 · 23.1% (37 of 160 decks)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 1.23 · 25.0% (40 of 160 decks)
- North Pole Patrol relevance 1.23 · 20.6% (33 of 160 decks)
- Clever Conjurer relevance 1.15 · 20.6% (33 of 160 decks)
- Marvin, Murderous Mimic relevance 0.99 · 23.8% (38 of 160 decks)
- Stinging Lionfish relevance 0.98 · 15.0% (24 of 160 decks)
- Watcher of Hours relevance 0.96 · 15.0% (24 of 160 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.94 · 44.4% (71 of 160 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 0.92 · 18.1% (29 of 160 decks)
- The Thirteenth Doctor relevance 0.92 · 19.4% (31 of 160 decks)
- Nimbleclaw Adept relevance 0.89 · 15.6% (25 of 160 decks)
- Forensic Researcher relevance 0.87 · 18.8% (30 of 160 decks)
- Taigam, Master Opportunist relevance 0.87 · 15.6% (25 of 160 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 1.01 · 18.1% (29 of 160 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.90 · 21.9% (35 of 160 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.88 · 16.3% (26 of 160 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.87 · 18.1% (29 of 160 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Instill Energy relevance 1.22 · 23.1% (37 of 160 decks)
All instants (20)
- High Stride relevance 3.48 · 53.1% (85 of 160 decks)
- Arachnoid Adaptation relevance 2.98 · 43.8% (70 of 160 decks)
- Burst of Strength relevance 2.57 · 41.3% (66 of 160 decks)
- Stony Strength relevance 2.35 · 36.9% (59 of 160 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 2.26 · 52.5% (84 of 160 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 2.16 · 53.8% (86 of 160 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 2.11 · 38.8% (62 of 160 decks)
- Twiddle relevance 2.00 · 31.9% (51 of 160 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 1.77 · 38.1% (61 of 160 decks)
- Dream's Grip relevance 1.75 · 25.6% (41 of 160 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 1.75 · 33.8% (54 of 160 decks)
- Pillar Launch relevance 1.63 · 25.0% (40 of 160 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 1.59 · 33.1% (53 of 160 decks)
- Refocus relevance 1.57 · 26.9% (43 of 160 decks)
- Triton Tactics relevance 1.54 · 22.5% (36 of 160 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 1.28 · 26.9% (43 of 160 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 1.22 · 40.0% (64 of 160 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 1.22 · 26.3% (42 of 160 decks)
- Boon of Boseiju relevance 1.11 · 16.3% (26 of 160 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.91 · 22.5% (36 of 160 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Inspiring Refrain relevance 1.48 · 27.5% (44 of 160 decks)
- Venture Forth relevance 1.41 · 25.6% (41 of 160 decks)
- Mobilize relevance 0.97 · 16.3% (26 of 160 decks)
- Reality Strobe relevance 0.94 · 15.6% (25 of 160 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 0.89 · 21.9% (35 of 160 decks)
- Wibbly-wobbly, Timey-wimey relevance 0.85 · 13.1% (21 of 160 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.83 · 19.4% (31 of 160 decks)
EDH data for Leaping Ambush: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 160 real decks.














































