Tidal Terror
Played in 300 Blue decks
2630+46+1+3+
Color Identity Spread
11.2% Blue
Commanders
Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor 17.0% of decks
Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor 17.0% of decks
Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep 10.9% of decks
Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep 10.9% of decks
Lorthos, the Tidemaker 9.6% of decks
Lorthos, the Tidemaker 9.6% of decks
Stitcher Geralf 5.9% of decks
Stitcher Geralf 5.9% of decks
Brinelin, the Moon Kraken 18.8% of decks
Brinelin, the Moon Kraken 18.8% of decks
Caelorna, Coral Tyrant 4.9% of decks
Caelorna, Coral Tyrant 4.9% of decks
Most Relevant
Marauding Brinefang 25.3% of decks
Marauding Brinefang 25.3% of decks
Daggermaw Megalodon 26.3% of decks
Daggermaw Megalodon 26.3% of decks
Lorthos, the Tidemaker 27.0% of decks
Lorthos, the Tidemaker 27.0% of decks
Giant Koi 22.7% of decks
Giant Koi 22.7% of decks
Monstrosity of the Lake 26.3% of decks
Monstrosity of the Lake 26.3% of decks
Whelming Wave 31.3% of decks
Whelming Wave 31.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (26)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 2.94 · 17.0% (28 of 165 decks)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 2.09 · 10.9% (13 of 119 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.37 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Stitcher Geralf relevance 1.32 · 5.9% (6 of 102 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 1.24 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.15 · 4.9% (5 of 103 decks)
- Kiora, the Rising Tide relevance 1.05 · 2.8% (6 of 217 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.04 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 0.97 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 0.91 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Tromokratis relevance 0.80 · 2.2% (4 of 181 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.77 · 1.9% (4 of 206 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 0.72 · 1.3% (5 of 397 decks)
- Oglor, Devoted Assistant relevance 0.65 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Dungeon Delver // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.63 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 0.60 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.57 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 0.54 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
- Donatello, Turtle Techie relevance 0.49 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro relevance 0.48 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.45 · 1.3% (2 of 154 decks)
- Alora, Merry Thief relevance 0.43 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Doc Ock, Sinister Scientist relevance 0.38 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Zahid, Djinn of the Lamp relevance 0.36 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.31 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Dungeon Delver // Imoen, Mystic Trickster relevance 0.27 · 1.2% (1 of 83 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Marauding Brinefang relevance 1.64 · 25.3% (76 of 300 decks)
- Daggermaw Megalodon relevance 1.58 · 26.3% (79 of 300 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.36 · 27.0% (81 of 300 decks)
- Giant Koi relevance 1.23 · 22.7% (68 of 300 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 1.22 · 26.3% (79 of 300 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.11 · 31.3% (94 of 300 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.08 · 20.7% (62 of 300 decks)
- Sealock Monster relevance 1.06 · 15.7% (47 of 300 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.04 · 18.3% (55 of 300 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 1.03 · 16.7% (50 of 300 decks)
- Stormsurge Kraken relevance 0.91 · 19.3% (58 of 300 decks)
- Serpent of Yawning Depths relevance 0.91 · 18.7% (56 of 300 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 0.89 · 17.3% (52 of 300 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 0.89 · 15.7% (47 of 300 decks)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 0.89 · 18.3% (55 of 300 decks)
- Ice Flan relevance 0.86 · 14.7% (44 of 300 decks)
- Kraken of the Straits relevance 0.84 · 15.0% (45 of 300 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 0.84 · 19.0% (57 of 300 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.83 · 35.0% (105 of 300 decks)
- Sword Coast Serpent // Capsizing Wave relevance 0.82 · 15.7% (47 of 300 decks)
- Tolarian Terror relevance 0.81 · 17.0% (51 of 300 decks)
- Tromokratis relevance 0.78 · 17.0% (51 of 300 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 0.75 · 13.7% (41 of 300 decks)
- Harbor Serpent relevance 0.75 · 12.0% (36 of 300 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 0.74 · 11.0% (33 of 300 decks)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 0.73 · 11.7% (35 of 300 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 0.73 · 18.7% (56 of 300 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 0.72 · 11.3% (34 of 300 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 0.71 · 24.0% (72 of 300 decks)
- Crush of Tentacles relevance 0.70 · 13.3% (40 of 300 decks)
All creatures (46)
- Marauding Brinefang relevance 1.64 · 25.3% (76 of 300 decks)
- Daggermaw Megalodon relevance 1.58 · 26.3% (79 of 300 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.36 · 27.0% (81 of 300 decks)
- Giant Koi relevance 1.23 · 22.7% (68 of 300 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 1.22 · 26.3% (79 of 300 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.08 · 20.7% (62 of 300 decks)
- Sealock Monster relevance 1.06 · 15.7% (47 of 300 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.04 · 18.3% (55 of 300 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 1.03 · 16.7% (50 of 300 decks)
- Stormsurge Kraken relevance 0.91 · 19.3% (58 of 300 decks)
- Serpent of Yawning Depths relevance 0.91 · 18.7% (56 of 300 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 0.89 · 17.3% (52 of 300 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 0.89 · 15.7% (47 of 300 decks)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 0.89 · 18.3% (55 of 300 decks)
- Ice Flan relevance 0.86 · 14.7% (44 of 300 decks)
- Kraken of the Straits relevance 0.84 · 15.0% (45 of 300 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 0.84 · 19.0% (57 of 300 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.83 · 35.0% (105 of 300 decks)
- Sword Coast Serpent // Capsizing Wave relevance 0.82 · 15.7% (47 of 300 decks)
- Tolarian Terror relevance 0.81 · 17.0% (51 of 300 decks)
- Tromokratis relevance 0.78 · 17.0% (51 of 300 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 0.75 · 13.7% (41 of 300 decks)
- Harbor Serpent relevance 0.75 · 12.0% (36 of 300 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 0.74 · 11.0% (33 of 300 decks)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 0.73 · 11.7% (35 of 300 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 0.73 · 18.7% (56 of 300 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 0.72 · 11.3% (34 of 300 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 0.71 · 24.0% (72 of 300 decks)
- Reservoir Kraken relevance 0.70 · 13.3% (40 of 300 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 0.69 · 14.3% (43 of 300 decks)
- Shipbreaker Kraken relevance 0.68 · 12.7% (38 of 300 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.68 · 12.0% (36 of 300 decks)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 0.67 · 21.3% (64 of 300 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 0.66 · 11.3% (34 of 300 decks)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 0.65 · 15.0% (45 of 300 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 0.64 · 17.0% (51 of 300 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 0.63 · 15.7% (47 of 300 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 0.61 · 12.3% (37 of 300 decks)
- Colossal Whale relevance 0.61 · 12.7% (38 of 300 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 0.60 · 10.7% (32 of 300 decks)
- Serpent of the Endless Sea relevance 0.58 · 9.3% (28 of 300 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.58 · 10.7% (32 of 300 decks)
- Breaching Leviathan relevance 0.58 · 11.7% (35 of 300 decks)
- Gearseeker Serpent relevance 0.57 · 9.7% (29 of 300 decks)
- Reef Worm relevance 0.56 · 12.0% (36 of 300 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.55 · 10.3% (31 of 300 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Quest for Ula's Temple relevance 0.55 · 9.3% (28 of 300 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.11 · 31.3% (94 of 300 decks)
- Crush of Tentacles relevance 0.70 · 13.3% (40 of 300 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.61 · 23.0% (69 of 300 decks)
EDH data for Tidal Terror: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 300 real decks.



































