Color Identity Spread
2.3% Selesnya
All commanders (4)
- Rhys the Redeemed relevance 1.99 · 1.1% (32 of 3,027 decks)
- Tolsimir Wolfblood relevance 1.34 · 2.8% (5 of 178 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Keleth, Sunmane Familiar relevance 0.84 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Lae'zel, Vlaakith's Champion relevance 0.73 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.54 · 63.0% (58 of 92 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 2.18 · 41.3% (38 of 92 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 2.08 · 46.7% (43 of 92 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.81 · 37.0% (34 of 92 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.78 · 33.7% (31 of 92 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 1.62 · 29.3% (27 of 92 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.61 · 28.3% (26 of 92 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.59 · 43.5% (40 of 92 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.58 · 37.0% (34 of 92 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 1.52 · 26.1% (24 of 92 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.51 · 28.3% (26 of 92 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.44 · 28.3% (26 of 92 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.35 · 27.2% (25 of 92 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.33 · 26.1% (24 of 92 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 1.31 · 20.7% (19 of 92 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 1.31 · 23.9% (22 of 92 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 1.30 · 22.8% (21 of 92 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.22 · 34.8% (32 of 92 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 1.19 · 23.9% (22 of 92 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 1.08 · 16.3% (15 of 92 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.08 · 20.7% (19 of 92 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.99 · 17.4% (16 of 92 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.99 · 19.6% (18 of 92 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.98 · 17.4% (16 of 92 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.96 · 18.5% (17 of 92 decks)
- Wirewood Herald relevance 0.94 · 14.1% (13 of 92 decks)
- Bramblewood Paragon relevance 0.92 · 15.2% (14 of 92 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.89 · 21.7% (20 of 92 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.86 · 18.5% (17 of 92 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.84 · 17.4% (16 of 92 decks)
All creatures (43)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.54 · 63.0% (58 of 92 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 2.08 · 46.7% (43 of 92 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.81 · 37.0% (34 of 92 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.78 · 33.7% (31 of 92 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 1.62 · 29.3% (27 of 92 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.61 · 28.3% (26 of 92 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.59 · 43.5% (40 of 92 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.58 · 37.0% (34 of 92 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 1.52 · 26.1% (24 of 92 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.51 · 28.3% (26 of 92 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.44 · 28.3% (26 of 92 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.35 · 27.2% (25 of 92 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.33 · 26.1% (24 of 92 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 1.31 · 20.7% (19 of 92 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 1.30 · 22.8% (21 of 92 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.22 · 34.8% (32 of 92 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 1.08 · 16.3% (15 of 92 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.08 · 20.7% (19 of 92 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.99 · 17.4% (16 of 92 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.99 · 19.6% (18 of 92 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.98 · 17.4% (16 of 92 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.96 · 18.5% (17 of 92 decks)
- Wirewood Herald relevance 0.94 · 14.1% (13 of 92 decks)
- Bramblewood Paragon relevance 0.92 · 15.2% (14 of 92 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.89 · 21.7% (20 of 92 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.86 · 18.5% (17 of 92 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.84 · 17.4% (16 of 92 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.80 · 41.3% (38 of 92 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.78 · 15.2% (14 of 92 decks)
- Conclave Guildmage relevance 0.77 · 14.1% (13 of 92 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.76 · 18.5% (17 of 92 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.76 · 18.5% (17 of 92 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 0.75 · 12.0% (11 of 92 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.74 · 27.2% (25 of 92 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.73 · 33.7% (31 of 92 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.72 · 46.7% (43 of 92 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elder relevance 0.72 · 10.9% (10 of 92 decks)
- Gaea's Herald relevance 0.71 · 10.9% (10 of 92 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.70 · 12.0% (11 of 92 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.69 · 23.9% (22 of 92 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.69 · 18.5% (17 of 92 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.68 · 12.0% (11 of 92 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.68 · 15.2% (14 of 92 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.68 · 17.4% (16 of 92 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Presence of Gond relevance 0.77 · 20.7% (19 of 92 decks)
All instants (2)
- Elven Ambush relevance 1.31 · 23.9% (22 of 92 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 1.19 · 23.9% (22 of 92 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 2.18 · 41.3% (38 of 92 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.76 · 18.5% (17 of 92 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.86 · 21.7% (20 of 92 decks)
EDH data for Ambush Commander: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 92 real decks.