Portent
Played in 2,397 Blue decks
3030+4+2+25+15+4+
Color Identity Spread
12.1% Blue
Commanders
God-Eternal Kefnet 33.2% of decks
God-Eternal Kefnet 33.2% of decks
Octavia, Living Thesis 15.1% of decks
Octavia, Living Thesis 15.1% of decks
Talrand, Sky Summoner 9.3% of decks
Talrand, Sky Summoner 9.3% of decks
Fblthp, Lost on the Range 12.8% of decks
Fblthp, Lost on the Range 12.8% of decks
Sash and Waistcoat, Unmen 9.5% of decks
Sash and Waistcoat, Unmen 9.5% of decks
Geralf, the Fleshwright 7.8% of decks
Geralf, the Fleshwright 7.8% of decks
Most Relevant
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- God-Eternal Kefnet relevance 2.74 · 33.2% (88 of 265 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 2.61 · 15.1% (255 of 1,687 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 2.25 · 9.3% (326 of 3,512 decks)
- Fblthp, Lost on the Range relevance 2.22 · 12.8% (151 of 1,184 decks)
- Sash and Waistcoat, Unmen relevance 1.60 · 9.5% (59 of 622 decks)
- Geralf, the Fleshwright relevance 1.56 · 7.8% (74 of 944 decks)
- Jalira, Master Polymorphist relevance 1.26 · 6.1% (49 of 800 decks)
- Jacob Hauken, Inspector // Hauken's Insight relevance 1.23 · 6.3% (42 of 666 decks)
- Fblthp, the Lost relevance 1.17 · 7.2% (28 of 388 decks)
- Alrund, God of the Cosmos // Hakka, Whispering Raven relevance 1.15 · 7.9% (23 of 291 decks)
- Hermes, Overseer of Elpis relevance 1.09 · 4.4% (53 of 1,198 decks)
- Hurkyl, Master Wizard relevance 1.04 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Council of Reeds relevance 1.01 · 4.5% (37 of 816 decks)
- Kopala, Warden of Waves relevance 0.99 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.94 · 4.2% (33 of 783 decks)
- Gandalf, Friend of the Shire relevance 0.88 · 5.2% (18 of 345 decks)
- Minn, Wily Illusionist relevance 0.87 · 2.5% (83 of 3,317 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.85 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Hraesvelgr of the First Brood relevance 0.78 · 5.4% (12 of 221 decks)
- Tomorrow, Azami's Familiar relevance 0.72 · 7.1% (7 of 99 decks)
- Kid Loki relevance 0.69 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- April O'Neil, Hacktivist relevance 0.68 · 6.3% (7 of 112 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 0.65 · 2.6% (25 of 972 decks)
- Taigam, Master Opportunist relevance 0.62 · 2.6% (21 of 822 decks)
- Kitsa, Otterball Elite relevance 0.60 · 3.5% (11 of 313 decks)
- Ambassador Laquatus relevance 0.58 · 5.3% (6 of 113 decks)
- Mondo Gecko relevance 0.58 · 3.3% (11 of 335 decks)
- Vnwxt, Verbose Host relevance 0.50 · 1.1% (73 of 6,362 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.48 · 3.0% (8 of 270 decks)
- Gustha Ebbasdotter relevance 0.47 · 4.2% (5 of 120 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Serum Visions relevance 1.13 · 43.1% (1,033 of 2,397 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.92 · 69.9% (1,675 of 2,397 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.92 · 60.1% (1,441 of 2,397 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.92 · 61.3% (1,470 of 2,397 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.89 · 46.1% (1,104 of 2,397 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.83 · 23.5% (564 of 2,397 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.78 · 22.5% (540 of 2,397 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.72 · 31.1% (746 of 2,397 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.71 · 24.4% (586 of 2,397 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.60 · 18.7% (449 of 2,397 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.55 · 21.5% (516 of 2,397 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.54 · 14.6% (349 of 2,397 decks)
- Telling Time relevance 0.53 · 11.5% (276 of 2,397 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.51 · 30.2% (724 of 2,397 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (264 of 2,397 decks)
- Quicken relevance 0.48 · 10.5% (252 of 2,397 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.48 · 32.1% (769 of 2,397 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.47 · 11.7% (280 of 2,397 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.47 · 11.8% (284 of 2,397 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.46 · 15.9% (380 of 2,397 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.46 · 28.0% (670 of 2,397 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.46 · 18.5% (444 of 2,397 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.45 · 14.2% (340 of 2,397 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.45 · 18.4% (442 of 2,397 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.45 · 14.1% (339 of 2,397 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.44 · 13.5% (324 of 2,397 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.43 · 25.1% (601 of 2,397 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.41 · 12.6% (303 of 2,397 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.41 · 18.6% (447 of 2,397 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 0.40 · 9.8% (234 of 2,397 decks)
All creatures (4)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.55 · 21.5% (516 of 2,397 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.51 · 30.2% (724 of 2,397 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.41 · 18.6% (447 of 2,397 decks)
- Haughty Djinn relevance 0.36 · 12.3% (295 of 2,397 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.43 · 25.1% (601 of 2,397 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.36 · 18.5% (443 of 2,397 decks)
All instants (25)
- Opt relevance 0.92 · 61.3% (1,470 of 2,397 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.89 · 46.1% (1,104 of 2,397 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.83 · 23.5% (564 of 2,397 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.71 · 24.4% (586 of 2,397 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.60 · 18.7% (449 of 2,397 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.54 · 14.6% (349 of 2,397 decks)
- Telling Time relevance 0.53 · 11.5% (276 of 2,397 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (264 of 2,397 decks)
- Quicken relevance 0.48 · 10.5% (252 of 2,397 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.48 · 32.1% (769 of 2,397 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.47 · 11.7% (280 of 2,397 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.46 · 28.0% (670 of 2,397 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.46 · 18.5% (444 of 2,397 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.41 · 12.6% (303 of 2,397 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 0.40 · 9.8% (234 of 2,397 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.40 · 15.5% (371 of 2,397 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (295 of 2,397 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.39 · 14.4% (344 of 2,397 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.39 · 11.6% (279 of 2,397 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.39 · 19.9% (476 of 2,397 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.38 · 10.8% (259 of 2,397 decks)
- Mental Note relevance 0.37 · 7.9% (189 of 2,397 decks)
- Mission Briefing relevance 0.36 · 9.8% (236 of 2,397 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.35 · 8.8% (210 of 2,397 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.34 · 16.3% (391 of 2,397 decks)
All sorceries (15)
- Serum Visions relevance 1.13 · 43.1% (1,033 of 2,397 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.92 · 69.9% (1,675 of 2,397 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.92 · 60.1% (1,441 of 2,397 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.78 · 22.5% (540 of 2,397 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.72 · 31.1% (746 of 2,397 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.47 · 11.8% (284 of 2,397 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.46 · 15.9% (380 of 2,397 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.45 · 14.2% (340 of 2,397 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.45 · 18.4% (442 of 2,397 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.45 · 14.1% (339 of 2,397 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.44 · 13.5% (324 of 2,397 decks)
- Sorcerous Sight relevance 0.37 · 6.2% (148 of 2,397 decks)
- Candlekeep Inspiration relevance 0.36 · 8.1% (194 of 2,397 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.36 · 12.1% (289 of 2,397 decks)
- Rise from the Tides relevance 0.34 · 8.0% (191 of 2,397 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.56 · 22.2% (531 of 2,397 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.47 · 15.8% (379 of 2,397 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.43 · 20.6% (493 of 2,397 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.38 · 19.8% (475 of 2,397 decks)
EDH data for Portent: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 2,397 real decks.











































































