Mending Touch
Played in 212 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (6)
- Hans Eriksson relevance 2.61 · 6.2% (28 of 451 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.76 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh relevance 0.56 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Gut, True Soul Zealot // Master Chef relevance 0.41 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.39 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
- Radha, Coalition Warlord relevance 0.39 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Withstand Death relevance 1.21 · 26.4% (56 of 212 decks)
- Regeneration relevance 0.77 · 12.7% (27 of 212 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.70 · 14.6% (31 of 212 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.67 · 16.5% (35 of 212 decks)
- Ranger's Guile relevance 0.66 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Mortal's Resolve relevance 0.64 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.56 · 16.0% (34 of 212 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.54 · 25.0% (53 of 212 decks)
- Hua Tuo, Honored Physician relevance 0.50 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Gruul Cluestone relevance 0.50 · 9.9% (21 of 212 decks)
- Magebane Armor relevance 0.47 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.46 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.43 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.43 · 12.3% (26 of 212 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.43 · 14.6% (31 of 212 decks)
- Brutalizer Exarch relevance 0.42 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.41 · 13.2% (28 of 212 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.41 · 10.4% (22 of 212 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.39 · 12.3% (26 of 212 decks)
- Tormenting Voice relevance 0.39 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Ruby, Daring Tracker relevance 0.39 · 17.0% (36 of 212 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.39 · 9.4% (20 of 212 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 0.39 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Mwonvuli Beast Tracker relevance 0.39 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.37 · 10.8% (23 of 212 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.36 · 9.9% (21 of 212 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.36 · 16.0% (34 of 212 decks)
- Radha, Heart of Keld relevance 0.36 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- Kessig Naturalist // Lord of the Ulvenwald relevance 0.36 · 10.8% (23 of 212 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.36 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
All creatures (16)
- Hua Tuo, Honored Physician relevance 0.50 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.43 · 12.3% (26 of 212 decks)
- Brutalizer Exarch relevance 0.42 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.41 · 13.2% (28 of 212 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.41 · 10.4% (22 of 212 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.39 · 12.3% (26 of 212 decks)
- Ruby, Daring Tracker relevance 0.39 · 17.0% (36 of 212 decks)
- Mwonvuli Beast Tracker relevance 0.39 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Radha, Heart of Keld relevance 0.36 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- Kessig Naturalist // Lord of the Ulvenwald relevance 0.36 · 10.8% (23 of 212 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.36 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.35 · 23.6% (50 of 212 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.35 · 9.9% (21 of 212 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.32 · 15.6% (33 of 212 decks)
- Ranging Raptors relevance 0.31 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Savage Ventmaw relevance 0.31 · 13.2% (28 of 212 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Gruul Cluestone relevance 0.50 · 9.9% (21 of 212 decks)
- Magebane Armor relevance 0.47 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 0.39 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.36 · 9.9% (21 of 212 decks)
- Brainstone relevance 0.34 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.33 · 10.8% (23 of 212 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Regeneration relevance 0.77 · 12.7% (27 of 212 decks)
- Broken Fall relevance 0.35 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Howl of the Hunt relevance 0.34 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
All instants (16)
- Withstand Death relevance 1.21 · 26.4% (56 of 212 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.70 · 14.6% (31 of 212 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.67 · 16.5% (35 of 212 decks)
- Ranger's Guile relevance 0.66 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Mortal's Resolve relevance 0.64 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.56 · 16.0% (34 of 212 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.54 · 25.0% (53 of 212 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.46 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.43 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.43 · 14.6% (31 of 212 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.39 · 9.4% (20 of 212 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.37 · 10.8% (23 of 212 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.36 · 16.0% (34 of 212 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.34 · 13.2% (28 of 212 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.33 · 14.6% (31 of 212 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 0.31 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Tormenting Voice relevance 0.39 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.36 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.35 · 18.9% (40 of 212 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.32 · 10.8% (23 of 212 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.31 · 16.0% (34 of 212 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.66 · 28.8% (61 of 212 decks)
All lands (3)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.65 · 20.8% (44 of 212 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.49 · 31.6% (67 of 212 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.45 · 25.0% (53 of 212 decks)
EDH data for Mending Touch: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 212 real decks.