Devouring Deep
Played in 40 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
17.5% Azorius
130+22+1+3+14+10+
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Gosta Dirk relevance 0.75 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Deep Freeze relevance 5.06 · 75.0% (30 of 40 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 4.98 · 72.5% (29 of 40 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 4.83 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Daring Sleuth // Bearer of Overwhelming Truths relevance 4.80 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Dragon's Eye Savants relevance 4.76 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Discontinuity relevance 4.71 · 72.5% (29 of 40 decks)
- Contradict relevance 4.66 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Deem Inferior relevance 4.65 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 4.64 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Deepmuck Desperado relevance 4.63 · 72.5% (29 of 40 decks)
- Compelling Argument relevance 4.61 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 4.60 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 4.59 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Dance of Many relevance 4.59 · 72.5% (29 of 40 decks)
- Curfew relevance 4.57 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 4.56 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Dire Downdraft relevance 4.54 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Curse of Echoes relevance 4.53 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 4.51 · 72.5% (29 of 40 decks)
- Academy Researchers relevance 4.50 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Catalog relevance 4.50 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 4.48 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 4.47 · 65.0% (26 of 40 decks)
- Departed Deckhand relevance 4.47 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Disciple of the Ring relevance 4.47 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Cosi's Trickster relevance 4.46 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 4.45 · 75.0% (30 of 40 decks)
- Court Hussar relevance 4.44 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Conundrum Sphinx relevance 4.43 · 65.0% (26 of 40 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 4.43 · 65.0% (26 of 40 decks)
All creatures (22)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 4.98 · 72.5% (29 of 40 decks)
- Daring Sleuth // Bearer of Overwhelming Truths relevance 4.80 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Dragon's Eye Savants relevance 4.76 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Deepmuck Desperado relevance 4.63 · 72.5% (29 of 40 decks)
- Academy Researchers relevance 4.50 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 4.48 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Departed Deckhand relevance 4.47 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Disciple of the Ring relevance 4.47 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Cosi's Trickster relevance 4.46 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Court Hussar relevance 4.44 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Conundrum Sphinx relevance 4.43 · 65.0% (26 of 40 decks)
- Conspiracy Unraveler relevance 4.43 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Deceiver Exarch relevance 4.42 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 4.41 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Avalanche Caller relevance 4.38 · 65.0% (26 of 40 decks)
- Disruptive Student relevance 4.35 · 65.0% (26 of 40 decks)
- Covert Technician relevance 4.32 · 65.0% (26 of 40 decks)
- Deluge Virtuoso relevance 4.31 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Constrictor Sage relevance 4.31 · 65.0% (26 of 40 decks)
- Coveted Peacock relevance 4.30 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Aspiring Aeronaut relevance 4.29 · 62.5% (25 of 40 decks)
- Daring Thief relevance 4.28 · 72.5% (29 of 40 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Collector's Case relevance 4.29 · 62.5% (25 of 40 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Deep Freeze relevance 5.06 · 75.0% (30 of 40 decks)
- Dance of Many relevance 4.59 · 72.5% (29 of 40 decks)
- Curse of Echoes relevance 4.53 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
All instants (14)
- Discontinuity relevance 4.71 · 72.5% (29 of 40 decks)
- Contradict relevance 4.66 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 4.64 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 4.60 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Curfew relevance 4.57 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Dire Downdraft relevance 4.54 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 4.51 · 72.5% (29 of 40 decks)
- Catalog relevance 4.50 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 4.47 · 65.0% (26 of 40 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 4.43 · 65.0% (26 of 40 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 4.36 · 72.5% (29 of 40 decks)
- Absorb Identity relevance 4.30 · 65.0% (26 of 40 decks)
- Deny Entry relevance 4.28 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Aether Tradewinds relevance 4.26 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 4.83 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Deem Inferior relevance 4.65 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Compelling Argument relevance 4.61 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 4.59 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 4.56 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 4.45 · 75.0% (30 of 40 decks)
- Cultural Exchange relevance 4.41 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Drag Under relevance 4.40 · 65.0% (26 of 40 decks)
- Acid Rain relevance 4.32 · 67.5% (27 of 40 decks)
- Defy Death relevance 4.28 · 65.0% (26 of 40 decks)
EDH data for Devouring Deep: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 40 real decks.

















































