Devouring Deep
Played in 37 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
16.4% Simic
All commanders (2)
- Xolatoyac, the Smiling Flood relevance 2.26 · 1.2% (16 of 1,388 decks)
- Nael, Avizoa Aeronaut relevance 0.60 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- River Boa relevance 2.93 · 43.2% (16 of 37 decks)
- Fishliver Oil relevance 2.76 · 43.2% (16 of 37 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 2.69 · 59.5% (22 of 37 decks)
- Enclave Elite relevance 2.60 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Colossal Whale relevance 2.53 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Merfolk Spy relevance 2.31 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Benthic Behemoth relevance 2.28 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 2.12 · 67.6% (25 of 37 decks)
- Stinging Lionfish relevance 2.11 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Meandering Towershell relevance 1.98 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Harbor Serpent relevance 1.90 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- The Flood of Mars relevance 1.80 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 1.77 · 51.4% (19 of 37 decks)
- Rishadan Dockhand relevance 1.73 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 1.72 · 56.8% (21 of 37 decks)
- Tui and La, Moon and Ocean relevance 1.61 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Ichthyomorphosis relevance 1.51 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Fishing Pole relevance 1.47 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- The Sea Devils relevance 1.34 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 1.27 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 1.24 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Elusive Krasis relevance 1.21 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- High Tide relevance 1.19 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Thada Adel, Acquisitor relevance 1.17 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Fisher's Talent relevance 1.14 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Merrow Harbinger relevance 1.08 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Tidal Barracuda relevance 1.05 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Bounty of the Luxa relevance 1.04 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Aquitect's Will relevance 0.98 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Stonybrook Banneret relevance 0.85 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
All creatures (31)
- River Boa relevance 2.93 · 43.2% (16 of 37 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 2.69 · 59.5% (22 of 37 decks)
- Enclave Elite relevance 2.60 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Colossal Whale relevance 2.53 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Merfolk Spy relevance 2.31 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Benthic Behemoth relevance 2.28 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 2.12 · 67.6% (25 of 37 decks)
- Stinging Lionfish relevance 2.11 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Meandering Towershell relevance 1.98 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Harbor Serpent relevance 1.90 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- The Flood of Mars relevance 1.80 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 1.77 · 51.4% (19 of 37 decks)
- Rishadan Dockhand relevance 1.73 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 1.72 · 56.8% (21 of 37 decks)
- Tui and La, Moon and Ocean relevance 1.61 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 1.27 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 1.24 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Elusive Krasis relevance 1.21 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Thada Adel, Acquisitor relevance 1.17 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Merrow Harbinger relevance 1.08 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Tidal Barracuda relevance 1.05 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Stonybrook Banneret relevance 0.85 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.80 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Murkfiend Liege relevance 0.79 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Sin, Unending Cataclysm relevance 0.77 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Master of the Pearl Trident relevance 0.72 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.69 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Lord of Atlantis relevance 0.63 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.51 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.46 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.41 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Fishing Pole relevance 1.47 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.34 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Fishliver Oil relevance 2.76 · 43.2% (16 of 37 decks)
- Ichthyomorphosis relevance 1.51 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- The Sea Devils relevance 1.34 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Fisher's Talent relevance 1.14 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Bounty of the Luxa relevance 1.04 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.44 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
All instants (1)
- High Tide relevance 1.19 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Aquitect's Will relevance 0.98 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.66 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.54 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.51 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.40 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
All lands (5)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.88 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.51 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.48 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.45 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.39 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
EDH data for Devouring Deep: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 37 real decks.