Fyndhorn Elves

Played in 20,643 Sultai decks

Fyndhorn Elves
$2.09 €3.30

Color Identity Spread

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Maralen, Fae Ascendant relevance 2.79 · 37.3% (10,023 of 26,874 decks)
  2. Thranduil, the Elvenking relevance 2.60 · 38.5% (4,638 of 12,041 decks)
  3. Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 1.52 · 63.3% (50 of 79 decks)
  4. Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 1.27 · 23.0% (226 of 982 decks)
  5. Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 1.14 · 56.8% (21 of 37 decks)
  6. Tasigur, the Golden Fang relevance 1.01 · 13.5% (398 of 2,959 decks)
  7. Ukkima, Stalking Shadow // Cazur, Ruthless Stalker relevance 0.92 · 12.8% (278 of 2,167 decks)
  8. Thrasios, Triton Hero // Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel relevance 0.77 · 36.4% (12 of 33 decks)
  9. Brokkos, Apex of Forever relevance 0.69 · 10.9% (110 of 1,009 decks)
  10. Sidisi, Brood Tyrant relevance 0.66 · 8.0% (296 of 3,708 decks)
  11. Damia, Sage of Stone relevance 0.60 · 8.5% (138 of 1,620 decks)
  12. Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.57 · 35.3% (6 of 17 decks)
  13. Thrasios, Triton Hero // Armix, Filigree Thrasher relevance 0.56 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
  14. Kotis, the Fangkeeper relevance 0.54 · 5.5% (506 of 9,175 decks)
  15. Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 0.45 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
  16. Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.45 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
  17. Zimone and Dina relevance 0.41 · 4.9% (165 of 3,370 decks)
  18. Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.40 · 8.1% (29 of 357 decks)
  19. Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.38 · 11.3% (12 of 106 decks)
  20. Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 0.38 · 4.0% (280 of 7,031 decks)
  21. Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 0.38 · 3.6% (483 of 13,549 decks)
  22. Vorosh, the Hunter relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (23 of 298 decks)
  23. Jorn, God of Winter // Kaldring, the Rimestaff relevance 0.36 · 4.5% (126 of 2,825 decks)
  24. Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 0.35 · 3.3% (428 of 12,940 decks)
  25. Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.34 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
  26. Henry Wu, InGen Geneticist relevance 0.33 · 5.8% (36 of 625 decks)
  27. Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.32 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
  28. Zaxara, the Exemplary relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (345 of 11,365 decks)
  29. Uugguu, the Omniplasm relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (163 of 4,665 decks)
  30. The Mimeoplasm relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (122 of 3,628 decks)

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Elvish Mystic
    1.48 83.5%
    $5.21 €4.86
  • Llanowar Elves
    1.33 91.1%
    $0.34 €0.21
  • Elves of Deep Shadow
    1.30 59.5%
    $5.23 €4.16
  • Priest of Titania
    1.25 55.3%
    $1.85 €0.93
  • Elvish Archdruid
    1.11 48.8%
    $7.52 €4.66
  • Beast Whisperer
    1.04 44.8%
    $9.08 €7.47
  • Imperious Perfect
    1.01 41.2%
    $0.36 €0.27
  • Lathril, Blade of the Elves
    0.99 42.4%
    $2.00 €1.52
  • Marwyn, the Nurturer
    0.95 34.5%
    $5.65 €5.74
  • Bloom Tender
    0.94 53.5%
    $13.66 €13.42
All most relevant (30)
  1. Elvish Mystic relevance 1.48 · 83.5% (17,246 of 20,643 decks)
  2. Llanowar Elves relevance 1.33 · 91.1% (18,798 of 20,643 decks)
  3. Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 1.30 · 59.5% (12,280 of 20,643 decks)
  4. Priest of Titania relevance 1.25 · 55.3% (11,419 of 20,643 decks)
  5. Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.11 · 48.8% (10,068 of 20,643 decks)
  6. Beast Whisperer relevance 1.04 · 44.8% (9,247 of 20,643 decks)
  7. Imperious Perfect relevance 1.01 · 41.2% (8,498 of 20,643 decks)
  8. Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.99 · 42.4% (8,748 of 20,643 decks)
  9. Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.95 · 34.5% (7,124 of 20,643 decks)
  10. Bloom Tender relevance 0.94 · 53.5% (11,051 of 20,643 decks)
  11. Formidable Speaker relevance 0.92 · 40.1% (8,282 of 20,643 decks)
  12. Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.91 · 33.4% (6,890 of 20,643 decks)
  13. High Fae Trickster relevance 0.87 · 37.9% (7,825 of 20,643 decks)
  14. Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.87 · 35.3% (7,284 of 20,643 decks)
  15. Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.81 · 25.5% (5,259 of 20,643 decks)
  16. Selfless Safewright relevance 0.79 · 29.9% (6,165 of 20,643 decks)
  17. Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.78 · 28.6% (5,903 of 20,643 decks)
  18. Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.78 · 29.8% (6,144 of 20,643 decks)
  19. Bitterblossom relevance 0.76 · 28.2% (5,827 of 20,643 decks)
  20. Deathrite Shaman relevance 0.75 · 41.4% (8,553 of 20,643 decks)
  21. Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.75 · 25.5% (5,264 of 20,643 decks)
  22. Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.74 · 26.4% (5,448 of 20,643 decks)
  23. Arbor Elf relevance 0.73 · 22.4% (4,620 of 20,643 decks)
  24. Reclamation Sage relevance 0.71 · 32.3% (6,663 of 20,643 decks)
  25. Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 0.71 · 24.8% (5,127 of 20,643 decks)
  26. Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.70 · 21.6% (4,456 of 20,643 decks)
  27. Devoted Druid relevance 0.70 · 25.4% (5,236 of 20,643 decks)
  28. Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.70 · 22.7% (4,679 of 20,643 decks)
  29. High Perfect Morcant relevance 0.69 · 25.8% (5,324 of 20,643 decks)
  30. Swan Song relevance 0.69 · 39.2% (8,082 of 20,643 decks)

Creatures

38

Showing 1-10 of 38

Page size
  • Elvish Mystic
    1.48 83.5%
    $5.21 €4.86
  • Llanowar Elves
    1.33 91.1%
    $0.34 €0.21
  • Elves of Deep Shadow
    1.30 59.5%
    $5.23 €4.16
  • Priest of Titania
    1.25 55.3%
    $1.85 €0.93
  • Elvish Archdruid
    1.11 48.8%
    $7.52 €4.66
  • Beast Whisperer
    1.04 44.8%
    $9.08 €7.47
  • Imperious Perfect
    1.01 41.2%
    $0.36 €0.27
  • Lathril, Blade of the Elves
    0.99 42.4%
    $2.00 €1.52
  • Marwyn, the Nurturer
    0.95 34.5%
    $5.65 €5.74
  • Bloom Tender
    0.94 53.5%
    $13.66 €13.42
All creatures (38)
  1. Elvish Mystic relevance 1.48 · 83.5% (17,246 of 20,643 decks)
  2. Llanowar Elves relevance 1.33 · 91.1% (18,798 of 20,643 decks)
  3. Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 1.30 · 59.5% (12,280 of 20,643 decks)
  4. Priest of Titania relevance 1.25 · 55.3% (11,419 of 20,643 decks)
  5. Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.11 · 48.8% (10,068 of 20,643 decks)
  6. Beast Whisperer relevance 1.04 · 44.8% (9,247 of 20,643 decks)
  7. Imperious Perfect relevance 1.01 · 41.2% (8,498 of 20,643 decks)
  8. Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.99 · 42.4% (8,748 of 20,643 decks)
  9. Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.95 · 34.5% (7,124 of 20,643 decks)
  10. Bloom Tender relevance 0.94 · 53.5% (11,051 of 20,643 decks)
  11. Formidable Speaker relevance 0.92 · 40.1% (8,282 of 20,643 decks)
  12. Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.91 · 33.4% (6,890 of 20,643 decks)
  13. High Fae Trickster relevance 0.87 · 37.9% (7,825 of 20,643 decks)
  14. Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.87 · 35.3% (7,284 of 20,643 decks)
  15. Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.81 · 25.5% (5,259 of 20,643 decks)
  16. Selfless Safewright relevance 0.79 · 29.9% (6,165 of 20,643 decks)
  17. Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.78 · 28.6% (5,903 of 20,643 decks)
  18. Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.78 · 29.8% (6,144 of 20,643 decks)
  19. Deathrite Shaman relevance 0.75 · 41.4% (8,553 of 20,643 decks)
  20. Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.75 · 25.5% (5,264 of 20,643 decks)
  21. Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.74 · 26.4% (5,448 of 20,643 decks)
  22. Arbor Elf relevance 0.73 · 22.4% (4,620 of 20,643 decks)
  23. Reclamation Sage relevance 0.71 · 32.3% (6,663 of 20,643 decks)
  24. Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 0.71 · 24.8% (5,127 of 20,643 decks)
  25. Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.70 · 21.6% (4,456 of 20,643 decks)
  26. Devoted Druid relevance 0.70 · 25.4% (5,236 of 20,643 decks)
  27. High Perfect Morcant relevance 0.69 · 25.8% (5,324 of 20,643 decks)
  28. Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.68 · 20.5% (4,229 of 20,643 decks)
  29. Talion, the Kindly Lord relevance 0.68 · 23.5% (4,845 of 20,643 decks)
  30. Urborg Elf relevance 0.66 · 21.9% (4,529 of 20,643 decks)
  31. Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.66 · 20.2% (4,162 of 20,643 decks)
  32. Scion of Oona relevance 0.66 · 21.8% (4,501 of 20,643 decks)
  33. Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.65 · 20.2% (4,167 of 20,643 decks)
  34. Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 0.65 · 23.3% (4,818 of 20,643 decks)
  35. Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.64 · 21.5% (4,446 of 20,643 decks)
  36. Fauna Shaman relevance 0.63 · 22.0% (4,546 of 20,643 decks)
  37. Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.59 · 17.8% (3,677 of 20,643 decks)
  38. Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor relevance 0.59 · 18.9% (3,904 of 20,643 decks)

Enchantments

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Bitterblossom
    0.76 28.2%
    $32.49 €25.42
  • Leyline of Anticipation
    0.65 24.6%
    $5.51 €5.36
  • Kindred Discovery
    0.63 22.6%
    $5.21 €5.05
  • Rhystic Study
    0.57 32.4%
    $69.59 €43.56
All enchantments (4)
  1. Bitterblossom relevance 0.76 · 28.2% (5,827 of 20,643 decks)
  2. Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.65 · 24.6% (5,075 of 20,643 decks)
  3. Kindred Discovery relevance 0.63 · 22.6% (4,669 of 20,643 decks)
  4. Rhystic Study relevance 0.57 · 32.4% (6,697 of 20,643 decks)

Instants

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Galadhrim Ambush
    0.70 22.7%
    $6.56 €6.38
  • Swan Song
    0.69 39.2%
    $10.26 €10.24
  • An Offer You Can't Refuse
    0.65 44.2%
    $3.24 €3.21
  • Dark Ritual
    0.58 29.4%
    $7.27 €8.75
  • Harmonized Crescendo
    0.58 20.6%
    $1.23 €0.66
All instants (5)
  1. Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.70 · 22.7% (4,679 of 20,643 decks)
  2. Swan Song relevance 0.69 · 39.2% (8,082 of 20,643 decks)
  3. An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.65 · 44.2% (9,120 of 20,643 decks)
  4. Dark Ritual relevance 0.58 · 29.4% (6,078 of 20,643 decks)
  5. Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.58 · 20.6% (4,246 of 20,643 decks)

Sorceries

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Finale of Devastation
    0.59 23.7%
    $32.65 €27.79
All sorceries (1)
  1. Finale of Devastation relevance 0.59 · 23.7% (4,902 of 20,643 decks)

Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Rejuvenating Springs
    0.57 45.5%
    $4.68 €4.02
  • Undergrowth Stadium
    0.56 44.1%
    $5.48 €4.96
All lands (2)
  1. Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.57 · 45.5% (9,388 of 20,643 decks)
  2. Undergrowth Stadium relevance 0.56 · 44.1% (9,098 of 20,643 decks)

EDH data for Fyndhorn Elves: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 20,643 real decks.