Sinuous Benthisaur

Played in 29 Simic decks

Sinuous Benthisaur
$0.14 €0.03

Color Identity Spread

Commanders

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
All commanders (2)
  1. Dungeon Delver // Erinis, Gloom Stalker relevance 0.98 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
  2. Blue, Loyal Raptor relevance 0.76 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)

Most Relevant

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Baru, Wurmspeaker
    1.29 27.6%
    $1.78 €0.56
  • Timber Protector
    1.26 27.6%
    $22.91 €11.30
  • Azami, Lady of Scrolls
    1.20 27.6%
    $0.42 €0.36
  • Sage of the Maze
    1.14 31.0%
    $0.63 €0.78
  • Hakbal of the Surging Soul
    0.98 27.6%
    $0.45 €1.37
  • Spelunking
    0.86 27.6%
    $3.70 €3.17
All most relevant (6)
  1. Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 1.29 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
  2. Timber Protector relevance 1.26 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
  3. Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 1.20 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
  4. Sage of the Maze relevance 1.14 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
  5. Hakbal of the Surging Soul relevance 0.98 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
  6. Spelunking relevance 0.86 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)

Creatures

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Baru, Wurmspeaker
    1.29 27.6%
    $1.78 €0.56
  • Timber Protector
    1.26 27.6%
    $22.91 €11.30
  • Azami, Lady of Scrolls
    1.20 27.6%
    $0.42 €0.36
  • Sage of the Maze
    1.14 31.0%
    $0.63 €0.78
  • Hakbal of the Surging Soul
    0.98 27.6%
    $0.45 €1.37
All creatures (5)
  1. Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 1.29 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
  2. Timber Protector relevance 1.26 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
  3. Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 1.20 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
  4. Sage of the Maze relevance 1.14 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
  5. Hakbal of the Surging Soul relevance 0.98 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)

Enchantments

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Spelunking
    0.86 27.6%
    $3.70 €3.17
All enchantments (1)
  1. Spelunking relevance 0.86 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)

Utility Lands

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Hidden Cataract
    1.96 48.3%
    $0.19 €0.07
  • Pit of Offerings
    1.88 34.5%
    $0.39 €0.21
  • Hidden Nursery
    1.65 41.4%
    $0.21 €0.07
  • Captivating Cave
    1.49 27.6%
    $0.24 €0.10
  • Basilisk Gate
    1.48 41.4%
    $0.36 €0.43
All utility lands (5)
  1. Hidden Cataract relevance 1.96 · 48.3% (14 of 29 decks)
  2. Pit of Offerings relevance 1.88 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
  3. Hidden Nursery relevance 1.65 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)
  4. Captivating Cave relevance 1.49 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
  5. Basilisk Gate relevance 1.48 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)

Lands

12

Showing 1-10 of 12

Page size
  • Sunken Citadel
    1.66 31.0%
    $0.51 €0.67
  • Baldur's Gate
    1.59 41.4%
    $3.82 €3.32
  • Cloudpost
    1.44 41.4%
    $0.31 €0.28
  • Urza's Power Plant
    1.34 41.4%
    $2.38 €0.80
  • Urza's Mine
    1.34 41.4%
    $1.18 €0.84
  • Urza's Tower
    1.33 41.4%
    $1.09 €0.79
  • Glimmerpost
    1.29 34.5%
    $0.29 €0.26
  • Echoing Deeps
    1.23 27.6%
    $0.80 €0.58
  • Planar Nexus
    1.22 34.5%
    $9.15 €8.29
  • Vesuva
    0.86 27.6%
    $3.79 €3.14
All lands (12)
  1. Sunken Citadel relevance 1.66 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
  2. Baldur's Gate relevance 1.59 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)
  3. Cloudpost relevance 1.44 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)
  4. Urza's Power Plant relevance 1.34 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)
  5. Urza's Mine relevance 1.34 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)
  6. Urza's Tower relevance 1.33 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)
  7. Glimmerpost relevance 1.29 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
  8. Echoing Deeps relevance 1.23 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
  9. Planar Nexus relevance 1.22 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
  10. Vesuva relevance 0.86 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
  11. Simic Guildgate relevance 0.72 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
  12. Temple of the False God relevance 0.53 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)

EDH data for Sinuous Benthisaur: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 29 real decks.