Rod of Absorption
Played in 114 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (4)
- Raised by Giants // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher relevance 2.48 · 6.5% (14 of 216 decks)
- The Thirteenth Doctor // Clara Oswald relevance 0.80 · 2.4% (2 of 84 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.78 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.56 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Crashing Footfalls relevance 0.87 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 0.82 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.77 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Memory's Journey relevance 0.76 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Dragonologist relevance 0.73 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Anurid Scavenger relevance 0.72 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.68 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Cathartic Parting relevance 0.67 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Stream of Thought relevance 0.66 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Time of Need relevance 0.63 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Gaea's Blessing relevance 0.57 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.56 · 23.7% (27 of 114 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.55 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.55 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Slime Against Humanity relevance 0.51 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.49 · 24.6% (28 of 114 decks)
- Sage of the Beyond relevance 0.49 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.49 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Fblthp, Lost on the Range relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.47 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.47 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.46 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Fortune Teller's Talent relevance 0.46 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Urn of Godfire relevance 0.45 · 7.0% (8 of 114 decks)
- Quandrix Command relevance 0.45 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Adaptive Training Post relevance 0.45 · 7.0% (8 of 114 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.43 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.43 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.43 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
All creatures (9)
- Dragonologist relevance 0.73 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Anurid Scavenger relevance 0.72 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.68 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Sage of the Beyond relevance 0.49 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Fblthp, Lost on the Range relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.47 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Green Slime relevance 0.42 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Illithid Harvester // Plant Tadpoles relevance 0.41 · 7.0% (8 of 114 decks)
- Battle Mammoth relevance 0.39 · 7.0% (8 of 114 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Urn of Godfire relevance 0.45 · 7.0% (8 of 114 decks)
- Adaptive Training Post relevance 0.45 · 7.0% (8 of 114 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- As Foretold relevance 0.49 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.46 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Fortune Teller's Talent relevance 0.46 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.42 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
All instants (16)
- Memory's Journey relevance 0.76 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.56 · 23.7% (27 of 114 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.55 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.55 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.49 · 24.6% (28 of 114 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.47 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Quandrix Command relevance 0.45 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.43 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.43 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.43 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Press the Enemy relevance 0.42 · 7.0% (8 of 114 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.40 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.40 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.40 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
All sorceries (12)
- Crashing Footfalls relevance 0.87 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 0.82 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.77 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Cathartic Parting relevance 0.67 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Stream of Thought relevance 0.66 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Time of Need relevance 0.63 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Gaea's Blessing relevance 0.57 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Slime Against Humanity relevance 0.51 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.42 · 32.5% (37 of 114 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.42 · 29.8% (34 of 114 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.40 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.39 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Jace Reawakened relevance 0.41 · 7.0% (8 of 114 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.63 · 22.8% (26 of 114 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.41 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.38 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
All lands (3)
- Cascading Cataracts relevance 0.47 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.42 · 27.2% (31 of 114 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.38 · 25.4% (29 of 114 decks)
EDH data for Rod of Absorption: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 114 real decks.