Ghost-Lit Warder
Played in 88 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
430+10+1+2+37+
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Clan Crafter // Lulu, Loyal Hollyphant relevance 0.55 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Ith, High Arcanist relevance 0.53 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- The Fifth Doctor // Adric, Mathematical Genius relevance 0.47 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- The Grand Calcutron relevance 0.43 · 1.3% (1 of 78 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Disruptive Pitmage relevance 2.79 · 40.9% (36 of 88 decks)
- Disruptive Student relevance 2.74 · 40.9% (36 of 88 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 2.51 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 2.50 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Geistlight Snare relevance 2.48 · 48.9% (43 of 88 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 2.42 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 2.42 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Hinder relevance 2.41 · 37.5% (33 of 88 decks)
- Hypnotic Sprite // Mesmeric Glare relevance 2.41 · 39.8% (35 of 88 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 2.34 · 39.8% (35 of 88 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 2.33 · 37.5% (33 of 88 decks)
- Complicate relevance 2.31 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 2.29 · 34.1% (30 of 88 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 2.26 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 2.24 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Censor relevance 2.21 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 2.21 · 37.5% (33 of 88 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 2.19 · 38.6% (34 of 88 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 2.19 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 2.16 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Declaration of Naught relevance 2.14 · 34.1% (30 of 88 decks)
- Countermand relevance 2.14 · 33.0% (29 of 88 decks)
- Contradict relevance 2.12 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 2.12 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Departed Deckhand relevance 2.11 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 2.09 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Intervene relevance 2.08 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 2.08 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Deprive relevance 2.07 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 2.07 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
All creatures (10)
- Disruptive Pitmage relevance 2.79 · 40.9% (36 of 88 decks)
- Disruptive Student relevance 2.74 · 40.9% (36 of 88 decks)
- Hypnotic Sprite // Mesmeric Glare relevance 2.41 · 39.8% (35 of 88 decks)
- Departed Deckhand relevance 2.11 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 2.06 · 33.0% (29 of 88 decks)
- Disciple of the Ring relevance 2.03 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Glamer Gifter relevance 2.00 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Hope-Ender Coatl relevance 1.98 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Gray Harbor Merfolk relevance 1.94 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Glint-Nest Crane relevance 1.94 · 28.4% (25 of 88 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Giant's Amulet relevance 1.94 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Declaration of Naught relevance 2.14 · 34.1% (30 of 88 decks)
- Hesitation relevance 2.01 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
All instants (37)
- Broken Concentration relevance 2.51 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 2.50 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Geistlight Snare relevance 2.48 · 48.9% (43 of 88 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 2.42 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 2.42 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Hinder relevance 2.41 · 37.5% (33 of 88 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 2.34 · 39.8% (35 of 88 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 2.33 · 37.5% (33 of 88 decks)
- Complicate relevance 2.31 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 2.29 · 34.1% (30 of 88 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 2.26 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 2.24 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Censor relevance 2.21 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 2.21 · 37.5% (33 of 88 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 2.19 · 38.6% (34 of 88 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 2.19 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 2.16 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Countermand relevance 2.14 · 33.0% (29 of 88 decks)
- Contradict relevance 2.12 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 2.12 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 2.09 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Intervene relevance 2.08 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 2.08 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Deprive relevance 2.07 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 2.07 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Glorious Gale relevance 2.06 · 33.0% (29 of 88 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 2.01 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Hydroblast relevance 2.01 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Brush Off relevance 1.99 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 1.99 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 1.99 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 1.98 · 33.0% (29 of 88 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 1.97 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Abjure relevance 1.97 · 37.5% (33 of 88 decks)
- Desertion relevance 1.96 · 34.1% (30 of 88 decks)
- Gather Specimens relevance 1.95 · 28.4% (25 of 88 decks)
- Convolute relevance 1.94 · 34.1% (30 of 88 decks)
EDH data for Ghost-Lit Warder: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 88 real decks.







































