Miraculous Recovery
Played in 81 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
4
Commanders
4Showing 1-4 of 4
Page size
All commanders (4)
- Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant relevance 1.20 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Palladia-Mors relevance 0.83 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.72 · 1.1% (2 of 189 decks)
- Jacques le Vert relevance 0.45 · 1.1% (1 of 95 decks)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30Showing 1-10 of 30
Page size
All most relevant (30)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 1.15 · 17.3% (14 of 81 decks)
- Prey Upon relevance 1.09 · 18.5% (15 of 81 decks)
- Destructive Revelry relevance 1.07 · 18.5% (15 of 81 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 1.04 · 18.5% (15 of 81 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.98 · 16.0% (13 of 81 decks)
- Condemn relevance 0.97 · 18.5% (15 of 81 decks)
- Lightning Helix relevance 0.97 · 17.3% (14 of 81 decks)
- Sun Titan relevance 0.93 · 25.9% (21 of 81 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.91 · 21.0% (17 of 81 decks)
- Pyrokinesis relevance 0.91 · 13.6% (11 of 81 decks)
- Ajani Vengeant relevance 0.89 · 14.8% (12 of 81 decks)
- Woolly Thoctar relevance 0.89 · 13.6% (11 of 81 decks)
- Loam Lion relevance 0.88 · 13.6% (11 of 81 decks)
- Battle Mastery relevance 0.84 · 16.0% (13 of 81 decks)
- Fires of Yavimaya relevance 0.84 · 22.2% (18 of 81 decks)
- Auramancer relevance 0.79 · 12.3% (10 of 81 decks)
- Late to Dinner relevance 0.77 · 13.6% (11 of 81 decks)
- Pyroclasm relevance 0.70 · 11.1% (9 of 81 decks)
- Wild Nacatl relevance 0.70 · 13.6% (11 of 81 decks)
- Qasali Pridemage relevance 0.69 · 17.3% (14 of 81 decks)
- Orcish Lumberjack relevance 0.69 · 14.8% (12 of 81 decks)
- Winds of Rath relevance 0.68 · 16.0% (13 of 81 decks)
- Naya Charm relevance 0.68 · 24.7% (20 of 81 decks)
- Marisi's Twinclaws relevance 0.66 · 9.9% (8 of 81 decks)
- Fleetfoot Panther relevance 0.64 · 13.6% (11 of 81 decks)
- Titanic Ultimatum relevance 0.54 · 16.0% (13 of 81 decks)
- Fling relevance 0.53 · 11.1% (9 of 81 decks)
- Spitemare relevance 0.48 · 9.9% (8 of 81 decks)
- Karmic Guide relevance 0.44 · 9.9% (8 of 81 decks)
- Behemoth Sledge relevance 0.43 · 17.3% (14 of 81 decks)
Creatures
15
Creatures
15 Showing 1-10 of 15
Page size
All creatures (15)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 1.15 · 17.3% (14 of 81 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 1.04 · 18.5% (15 of 81 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.98 · 16.0% (13 of 81 decks)
- Sun Titan relevance 0.93 · 25.9% (21 of 81 decks)
- Woolly Thoctar relevance 0.89 · 13.6% (11 of 81 decks)
- Loam Lion relevance 0.88 · 13.6% (11 of 81 decks)
- Auramancer relevance 0.79 · 12.3% (10 of 81 decks)
- Wild Nacatl relevance 0.70 · 13.6% (11 of 81 decks)
- Qasali Pridemage relevance 0.69 · 17.3% (14 of 81 decks)
- Orcish Lumberjack relevance 0.69 · 14.8% (12 of 81 decks)
- Marisi's Twinclaws relevance 0.66 · 9.9% (8 of 81 decks)
- Fleetfoot Panther relevance 0.64 · 13.6% (11 of 81 decks)
- Spitemare relevance 0.48 · 9.9% (8 of 81 decks)
- Karmic Guide relevance 0.44 · 9.9% (8 of 81 decks)
- Ajani's Pridemate relevance 0.41 · 9.9% (8 of 81 decks)
Artifacts
2
Artifacts
2 
All artifacts (2)
- Behemoth Sledge relevance 0.43 · 17.3% (14 of 81 decks)
- Talisman of Conviction relevance 0.28 · 11.1% (9 of 81 decks)
Enchantments
2
Enchantments
2 All enchantments (2)
- Battle Mastery relevance 0.84 · 16.0% (13 of 81 decks)
- Fires of Yavimaya relevance 0.84 · 22.2% (18 of 81 decks)
Instants
8
Instants
8 Showing 1-8 of 8
Page size
All instants (8)
- Destructive Revelry relevance 1.07 · 18.5% (15 of 81 decks)
- Condemn relevance 0.97 · 18.5% (15 of 81 decks)
- Lightning Helix relevance 0.97 · 17.3% (14 of 81 decks)
- Pyrokinesis relevance 0.91 · 13.6% (11 of 81 decks)
- Naya Charm relevance 0.68 · 24.7% (20 of 81 decks)
- Fling relevance 0.53 · 11.1% (9 of 81 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.33 · 11.1% (9 of 81 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.33 · 12.3% (10 of 81 decks)
Sorceries
7
Sorceries
7 Showing 1-7 of 7
Page size
All sorceries (7)
- Prey Upon relevance 1.09 · 18.5% (15 of 81 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.91 · 21.0% (17 of 81 decks)
- Late to Dinner relevance 0.77 · 13.6% (11 of 81 decks)
- Pyroclasm relevance 0.70 · 11.1% (9 of 81 decks)
- Winds of Rath relevance 0.68 · 16.0% (13 of 81 decks)
- Titanic Ultimatum relevance 0.54 · 16.0% (13 of 81 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.37 · 9.9% (8 of 81 decks)
Planeswalkers
1
Planeswalkers
1 Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
All planeswalkers (1)
- Ajani Vengeant relevance 0.89 · 14.8% (12 of 81 decks)
Utility Lands
5
Utility Lands
5 Showing 1-5 of 5
Page size
All utility lands (5)
- Kazandu Refuge relevance 1.08 · 23.5% (19 of 81 decks)
- Skarrg, the Rage Pits relevance 1.08 · 22.2% (18 of 81 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.87 · 18.5% (15 of 81 decks)
- Graypelt Refuge relevance 0.86 · 19.8% (16 of 81 decks)
- Vitu-Ghazi, the City-Tree relevance 0.56 · 9.9% (8 of 81 decks)
Lands
10
Lands
10 Showing 1-10 of 10
Page size
All lands (10)
- Boros Guildgate relevance 1.06 · 25.9% (21 of 81 decks)
- Rupture Spire relevance 0.85 · 13.6% (11 of 81 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.63 · 37.0% (30 of 81 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.57 · 45.7% (37 of 81 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.40 · 9.9% (8 of 81 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.33 · 11.1% (9 of 81 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.33 · 11.1% (9 of 81 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.32 · 11.1% (9 of 81 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.31 · 11.1% (9 of 81 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.29 · 12.3% (10 of 81 decks)
EDH data for Miraculous Recovery: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 81 real decks.