Forced Retreat
Played in 80 Blue decks
430+19+2+2+15+12+
Color Identity Spread
30.1% Blue
Commanders
Sun Quan, Lord of Wu 2.9% of decks
Sun Quan, Lord of Wu 2.9% of decks
Lu Xun, Scholar General 7.9% of decks
Lu Xun, Scholar General 7.9% of decks
Wan Shi Tong, All-Knowing 1.5% of decks
Wan Shi Tong, All-Knowing 1.5% of decks
Bilbo Baggins, Burglar // Take a Glance 3.8% of decks
Bilbo Baggins, Burglar // Take a Glance 3.8% of decks
Most Relevant
Wu Scout 41.3% of decks
Wu Scout 41.3% of decks
Exhaustion 36.3% of decks
Exhaustion 36.3% of decks
Anchor to the Aether 31.3% of decks
Anchor to the Aether 31.3% of decks
Borrowing 100,000 Arrows 38.8% of decks
Borrowing 100,000 Arrows 38.8% of decks
Lu Xun, Scholar General 31.3% of decks
Lu Xun, Scholar General 31.3% of decks
Brilliant Plan 23.8% of decks
Brilliant Plan 23.8% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 2.64 · 2.9% (28 of 957 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 2.13 · 7.9% (8 of 101 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, All-Knowing relevance 2.13 · 1.5% (24 of 1,598 decks)
- Bilbo Baggins, Burglar // Take a Glance relevance 0.58 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Wu Scout relevance 2.78 · 41.3% (33 of 80 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 2.12 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Anchor to the Aether relevance 1.89 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.87 · 38.8% (31 of 80 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 1.74 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 1.63 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Cavalier of Gales relevance 1.54 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.37 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Herald of Hoofbeats relevance 1.27 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 1.19 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Dutiful Knowledge Seeker relevance 1.18 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Patrician Geist relevance 1.13 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Dream Cache relevance 1.06 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Spell Crumple relevance 0.99 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Hinder relevance 0.99 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 0.98 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Force Away relevance 0.93 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Expel from Orazca relevance 0.93 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Knights of Dol Amroth relevance 0.92 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Bury in Books relevance 0.87 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Whisk Away relevance 0.87 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Supreme Phantom relevance 0.85 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Konda's Banner relevance 0.85 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Sweep Away relevance 0.82 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Vendilion Clique relevance 0.79 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- See Beyond relevance 0.79 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Diamond Mare relevance 0.78 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Deem Inferior relevance 0.77 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Horned Loch-Whale // Lagoon Breach relevance 0.76 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Temporal Cleansing relevance 0.74 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Wu Scout relevance 2.78 · 41.3% (33 of 80 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 1.74 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Cavalier of Gales relevance 1.54 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Herald of Hoofbeats relevance 1.27 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Dutiful Knowledge Seeker relevance 1.18 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Patrician Geist relevance 1.13 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Knights of Dol Amroth relevance 0.92 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Supreme Phantom relevance 0.85 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Vendilion Clique relevance 0.79 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Diamond Mare relevance 0.78 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Horned Loch-Whale // Lagoon Breach relevance 0.76 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Akroan Horse relevance 0.73 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Tomb Trawler relevance 0.73 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Cobbled Lancer relevance 0.72 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Phantasmal Mount relevance 0.68 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Breaching Hippocamp relevance 0.67 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Riverwise Augur relevance 0.67 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Cosmos Charger relevance 0.64 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Surge Mare relevance 0.60 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Konda's Banner relevance 0.85 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.60 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.69 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Levitation relevance 0.65 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
All instants (15)
- Memory Lapse relevance 1.19 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Spell Crumple relevance 0.99 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Hinder relevance 0.99 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Force Away relevance 0.93 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Expel from Orazca relevance 0.93 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Bury in Books relevance 0.87 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Whisk Away relevance 0.87 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Sweep Away relevance 0.82 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Swat Away relevance 0.73 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.71 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Lat-Nam's Legacy relevance 0.66 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Commit // Memory relevance 0.65 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Vanishment relevance 0.65 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Synchronized Eviction relevance 0.65 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.59 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
All sorceries (12)
- Exhaustion relevance 2.12 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Anchor to the Aether relevance 1.89 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.87 · 38.8% (31 of 80 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 1.63 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.37 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Dream Cache relevance 1.06 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 0.98 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- See Beyond relevance 0.79 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Deem Inferior relevance 0.77 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Temporal Cleansing relevance 0.74 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Jailbreak Scheme relevance 0.62 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Clear the Mind relevance 0.60 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
EDH data for Forced Retreat: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 80 real decks.












































