Cultbrand Cinder
Played in 29 Five-Color decks
Color Identity Spread
27.6% Five-Color
- Jund 38 · 36.2%
- Rakdos 32 · 30.5%
- Five-Color 29 · 27.6%
- Grixis 3 · 2.9%
- Other (3) 3 · 2.9%
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- Cloudkin Seer relevance 2.36 · 37.9% (11 of 29 decks)
- Faultgrinder relevance 2.33 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Explosive Prodigy relevance 2.16 · 37.9% (11 of 29 decks)
- Hivespine Wolverine relevance 2.00 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Rimekin Recluse relevance 1.99 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Flamekin Gildweaver relevance 1.99 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Kulrath Zealot relevance 1.95 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Earth-Cult Elemental relevance 1.91 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Flaring Cinder relevance 1.90 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Kindle the Inner Flame relevance 1.82 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Kithkeeper relevance 1.77 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 1.52 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Flamekin Harbinger relevance 1.51 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Twinflame Travelers relevance 1.48 · 51.7% (15 of 29 decks)
- Eclipsed Flamekin relevance 1.42 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Cavalier of Night relevance 1.37 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Grief relevance 1.35 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Ashling's Command relevance 1.35 · 37.9% (11 of 29 decks)
- Animar, Soul of Elements relevance 1.25 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)
- Cavalier of Flame relevance 1.21 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.19 · 51.7% (15 of 29 decks)
- Shinestriker relevance 1.14 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 1.12 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Cavalier of Dawn relevance 1.11 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 1.10 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Smokebraider relevance 1.09 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)
- Brighthearth Banneret relevance 1.08 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Champion of the Path relevance 1.08 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Horde of Notions relevance 1.07 · 37.9% (11 of 29 decks)
- Flamebraider relevance 1.07 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)
Creatures
48
Creatures
48 All creatures (48)
- Cloudkin Seer relevance 2.36 · 37.9% (11 of 29 decks)
- Faultgrinder relevance 2.33 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Explosive Prodigy relevance 2.16 · 37.9% (11 of 29 decks)
- Hivespine Wolverine relevance 2.00 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Rimekin Recluse relevance 1.99 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Flamekin Gildweaver relevance 1.99 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Kulrath Zealot relevance 1.95 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Earth-Cult Elemental relevance 1.91 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Flaring Cinder relevance 1.90 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Kithkeeper relevance 1.77 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 1.52 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Flamekin Harbinger relevance 1.51 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Twinflame Travelers relevance 1.48 · 51.7% (15 of 29 decks)
- Eclipsed Flamekin relevance 1.42 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Cavalier of Night relevance 1.37 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Grief relevance 1.35 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Animar, Soul of Elements relevance 1.25 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)
- Cavalier of Flame relevance 1.21 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.19 · 51.7% (15 of 29 decks)
- Shinestriker relevance 1.14 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 1.12 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Cavalier of Dawn relevance 1.11 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 1.10 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Smokebraider relevance 1.09 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)
- Brighthearth Banneret relevance 1.08 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Champion of the Path relevance 1.08 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Horde of Notions relevance 1.07 · 37.9% (11 of 29 decks)
- Flamebraider relevance 1.07 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)
- Grave Sifter relevance 1.07 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Ashling, Rekindled // Ashling, Rimebound relevance 1.07 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 1.03 · 37.9% (11 of 29 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.01 · 37.9% (11 of 29 decks)
- Shimmercreep relevance 1.01 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Ingot Chewer relevance 0.97 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Incandescent Soulstoke relevance 0.96 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Shriekmaw relevance 0.94 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Belonging relevance 0.94 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.93 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Sunderflock relevance 0.91 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.90 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.89 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Mass of Mysteries relevance 0.87 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.87 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Vernal Sovereign relevance 0.86 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Lamentation relevance 0.83 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Impulsivity relevance 0.81 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Cavalier of Thorns relevance 0.79 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 0.78 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
Instants
1
Instants
1 All instants (1)
- Ashling's Command relevance 1.35 · 37.9% (11 of 29 decks)
Sorceries
1
Sorceries
1 All sorceries (1)
- Kindle the Inner Flame relevance 1.82 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
EDH data for Cultbrand Cinder: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 29 real decks.


















































