Faces of the Past
Played in 154 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
6.1% Azorius
730+11+3+16+8+12+
That's every commander.
All commanders (7)
- Timin, Youthful Geist // Rhoda, Geist Avenger relevance 1.05 · 1.2% (7 of 587 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Folk Hero relevance 0.83 · 1.3% (4 of 309 decks)
- Ojutai, Soul of Winter relevance 0.69 · 2.4% (2 of 85 decks)
- Clara Oswald // The Fifth Doctor relevance 0.67 · 2.1% (2 of 94 decks)
- Imoen, Mystic Trickster // Folk Hero relevance 0.51 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Renari, Merchant of Marvels // Folk Hero relevance 0.41 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Tobias, Doomed Conqueror relevance 0.36 · 1.3% (1 of 79 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Opposition relevance 1.54 · 44.8% (69 of 154 decks)
- Blustersquall relevance 1.48 · 43.5% (67 of 154 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.41 · 39.0% (60 of 154 decks)
- Ensnare relevance 1.38 · 27.9% (43 of 154 decks)
- Aura of Dominion relevance 1.38 · 21.4% (33 of 154 decks)
- Diversionary Tactics relevance 1.37 · 20.8% (32 of 154 decks)
- Drain Power relevance 1.35 · 20.1% (31 of 154 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 1.34 · 22.1% (34 of 154 decks)
- Court Street Denizen relevance 1.30 · 36.4% (56 of 154 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 1.29 · 39.6% (61 of 154 decks)
- Flood relevance 1.28 · 20.8% (32 of 154 decks)
- Citadel Siege relevance 1.28 · 35.7% (55 of 154 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 1.28 · 20.1% (31 of 154 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 1.27 · 40.3% (62 of 154 decks)
- Ballynock Trapper relevance 1.25 · 22.7% (35 of 154 decks)
- Cone of Cold relevance 1.25 · 33.1% (51 of 154 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 1.23 · 18.8% (29 of 154 decks)
- Dreamshackle Geist relevance 1.22 · 36.4% (56 of 154 decks)
- Dream Tides relevance 1.22 · 20.1% (31 of 154 decks)
- Coastal Breach relevance 1.21 · 18.2% (28 of 154 decks)
- Cryptic Gateway relevance 1.21 · 18.2% (28 of 154 decks)
- Entrancing Melody relevance 1.21 · 17.5% (27 of 154 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 1.20 · 39.0% (60 of 154 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 1.20 · 17.5% (27 of 154 decks)
- Energy Arc relevance 1.19 · 21.4% (33 of 154 decks)
- Crackdown relevance 1.19 · 19.5% (30 of 154 decks)
- Gideon's Avenger relevance 1.19 · 24.7% (38 of 154 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 1.19 · 18.2% (28 of 154 decks)
- Sleep relevance 1.18 · 31.8% (49 of 154 decks)
- Sharae of Numbing Depths relevance 1.18 · 36.4% (56 of 154 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 1.34 · 22.1% (34 of 154 decks)
- Court Street Denizen relevance 1.30 · 36.4% (56 of 154 decks)
- Ballynock Trapper relevance 1.25 · 22.7% (35 of 154 decks)
- Dreamshackle Geist relevance 1.22 · 36.4% (56 of 154 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 1.20 · 17.5% (27 of 154 decks)
- Gideon's Avenger relevance 1.19 · 24.7% (38 of 154 decks)
- Sharae of Numbing Depths relevance 1.18 · 36.4% (56 of 154 decks)
- Fogwalker relevance 1.17 · 17.5% (27 of 154 decks)
- Filigree Sages relevance 1.15 · 17.5% (27 of 154 decks)
- Fatestitcher relevance 1.14 · 24.0% (37 of 154 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 1.14 · 31.8% (49 of 154 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 1.29 · 39.6% (61 of 154 decks)
- Cryptic Gateway relevance 1.21 · 18.2% (28 of 154 decks)
- Assassin Gauntlet relevance 1.13 · 25.3% (39 of 154 decks)
All enchantments (16)
- Opposition relevance 1.54 · 44.8% (69 of 154 decks)
- Aura of Dominion relevance 1.38 · 21.4% (33 of 154 decks)
- Diversionary Tactics relevance 1.37 · 20.8% (32 of 154 decks)
- Flood relevance 1.28 · 20.8% (32 of 154 decks)
- Citadel Siege relevance 1.28 · 35.7% (55 of 154 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 1.28 · 20.1% (31 of 154 decks)
- Dream Tides relevance 1.22 · 20.1% (31 of 154 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 1.20 · 39.0% (60 of 154 decks)
- Crackdown relevance 1.19 · 19.5% (30 of 154 decks)
- Call to the Kindred relevance 1.18 · 18.2% (28 of 154 decks)
- Energy Flux relevance 1.17 · 18.2% (28 of 154 decks)
- Eye of the Storm relevance 1.17 · 18.8% (29 of 154 decks)
- Fool's Demise relevance 1.16 · 17.5% (27 of 154 decks)
- Solitary Sanctuary relevance 1.15 · 33.1% (51 of 154 decks)
- Dream Halls relevance 1.14 · 17.5% (27 of 154 decks)
- Curse of Echoes relevance 1.13 · 16.9% (26 of 154 decks)
All instants (8)
- Blustersquall relevance 1.48 · 43.5% (67 of 154 decks)
- Ensnare relevance 1.38 · 27.9% (43 of 154 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 1.27 · 40.3% (62 of 154 decks)
- Energy Arc relevance 1.19 · 21.4% (33 of 154 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 1.19 · 18.2% (28 of 154 decks)
- Flatline relevance 1.17 · 18.2% (28 of 154 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 1.17 · 16.9% (26 of 154 decks)
- Gather Specimens relevance 1.16 · 16.9% (26 of 154 decks)
All sorceries (12)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.41 · 39.0% (60 of 154 decks)
- Drain Power relevance 1.35 · 20.1% (31 of 154 decks)
- Cone of Cold relevance 1.25 · 33.1% (51 of 154 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 1.23 · 18.8% (29 of 154 decks)
- Coastal Breach relevance 1.21 · 18.2% (28 of 154 decks)
- Entrancing Melody relevance 1.21 · 17.5% (27 of 154 decks)
- Sleep relevance 1.18 · 31.8% (49 of 154 decks)
- Eternal Dominion relevance 1.17 · 16.9% (26 of 154 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 1.16 · 17.5% (27 of 154 decks)
- Don't Move relevance 1.13 · 26.0% (40 of 154 decks)
- False Defeat relevance 1.13 · 16.9% (26 of 154 decks)
- Blinding Light relevance 1.13 · 18.2% (28 of 154 decks)
EDH data for Faces of the Past: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 154 real decks.




























































