Faces of the Past
Played in 102 Grixis decks
Color Identity Spread
4.0% Grixis
All commanders (1)
- Tetsuo Umezawa relevance 0.48 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 1.82 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Marrow-Gnawer relevance 1.45 · 34.3% (35 of 102 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 1.18 · 28.4% (29 of 102 decks)
- Lord Skitter, Sewer King relevance 1.16 · 28.4% (29 of 102 decks)
- Bloodline Necromancer relevance 1.16 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Galecaster Colossus relevance 1.14 · 23.5% (24 of 102 decks)
- Stonybrook Banneret relevance 1.09 · 25.5% (26 of 102 decks)
- Naban, Dean of Iteration relevance 1.05 · 30.4% (31 of 102 decks)
- Vren, the Relentless relevance 1.04 · 25.5% (26 of 102 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 1.03 · 29.4% (30 of 102 decks)
- Voracious Vermin relevance 1.01 · 22.5% (23 of 102 decks)
- Piper of the Swarm relevance 0.99 · 23.5% (24 of 102 decks)
- Lord Skitter's Butcher relevance 0.99 · 22.5% (23 of 102 decks)
- Persistent Marshstalker relevance 0.98 · 22.5% (23 of 102 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.96 · 29.4% (30 of 102 decks)
- Song of Totentanz relevance 0.93 · 22.5% (23 of 102 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.93 · 28.4% (29 of 102 decks)
- Arcane Adaptation relevance 0.92 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
- Totentanz, Swarm Piper relevance 0.90 · 20.6% (21 of 102 decks)
- Archmage of Echoes relevance 0.89 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
- Basalt Ravager relevance 0.88 · 17.6% (18 of 102 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.88 · 25.5% (26 of 102 decks)
- Taurean Mauler relevance 0.88 · 22.5% (23 of 102 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.85 · 28.4% (29 of 102 decks)
- Goblin Bombardment relevance 0.85 · 25.5% (26 of 102 decks)
- Leyline of Transformation relevance 0.84 · 18.6% (19 of 102 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.84 · 24.5% (25 of 102 decks)
- Karumonix, the Rat King relevance 0.84 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
- Bloodline Pretender relevance 0.83 · 18.6% (19 of 102 decks)
- Pack Rat relevance 0.82 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
All creatures (34)
- Marrow-Gnawer relevance 1.45 · 34.3% (35 of 102 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 1.18 · 28.4% (29 of 102 decks)
- Lord Skitter, Sewer King relevance 1.16 · 28.4% (29 of 102 decks)
- Bloodline Necromancer relevance 1.16 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Galecaster Colossus relevance 1.14 · 23.5% (24 of 102 decks)
- Stonybrook Banneret relevance 1.09 · 25.5% (26 of 102 decks)
- Naban, Dean of Iteration relevance 1.05 · 30.4% (31 of 102 decks)
- Vren, the Relentless relevance 1.04 · 25.5% (26 of 102 decks)
- Voracious Vermin relevance 1.01 · 22.5% (23 of 102 decks)
- Piper of the Swarm relevance 0.99 · 23.5% (24 of 102 decks)
- Lord Skitter's Butcher relevance 0.99 · 22.5% (23 of 102 decks)
- Persistent Marshstalker relevance 0.98 · 22.5% (23 of 102 decks)
- Totentanz, Swarm Piper relevance 0.90 · 20.6% (21 of 102 decks)
- Archmage of Echoes relevance 0.89 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
- Basalt Ravager relevance 0.88 · 17.6% (18 of 102 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.88 · 25.5% (26 of 102 decks)
- Taurean Mauler relevance 0.88 · 22.5% (23 of 102 decks)
- Karumonix, the Rat King relevance 0.84 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
- Bloodline Pretender relevance 0.83 · 18.6% (19 of 102 decks)
- Pack Rat relevance 0.82 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
- Ogre Slumlord relevance 0.82 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 0.81 · 16.7% (17 of 102 decks)
- Valley Rotcaller relevance 0.81 · 17.6% (18 of 102 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.79 · 20.6% (21 of 102 decks)
- Swarm of Rats relevance 0.79 · 13.7% (14 of 102 decks)
- Chittering Witch relevance 0.79 · 17.6% (18 of 102 decks)
- Vedalken Aethermage relevance 0.79 · 18.6% (19 of 102 decks)
- Apprentice Necromancer relevance 0.78 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
- Patron Wizard relevance 0.72 · 13.7% (14 of 102 decks)
- Azure Beastbinder relevance 0.71 · 16.7% (17 of 102 decks)
- Nashi, Searcher in the Dark relevance 0.71 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
- Shoreline Looter relevance 0.71 · 16.7% (17 of 102 decks)
- Tangled Colony relevance 0.70 · 15.7% (16 of 102 decks)
- Anathemancer relevance 0.69 · 13.7% (14 of 102 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.93 · 28.4% (29 of 102 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.85 · 28.4% (29 of 102 decks)
All enchantments (8)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 1.82 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 1.03 · 29.4% (30 of 102 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.96 · 29.4% (30 of 102 decks)
- Arcane Adaptation relevance 0.92 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
- Goblin Bombardment relevance 0.85 · 25.5% (26 of 102 decks)
- Leyline of Transformation relevance 0.84 · 18.6% (19 of 102 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.84 · 24.5% (25 of 102 decks)
- Molten Echoes relevance 0.74 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
All instants (1)
- Wizard's Retort relevance 0.78 · 18.6% (19 of 102 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Song of Totentanz relevance 0.93 · 22.5% (23 of 102 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.78 · 21.6% (22 of 102 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Swarmyard relevance 1.09 · 24.5% (25 of 102 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.91 · 26.5% (27 of 102 decks)
All lands (1)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.80 · 20.6% (21 of 102 decks)
EDH data for Faces of the Past: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 102 real decks.