Devouring Sugarmaw // Have for Dinner
Played in 44 Esper decks
230+21+4+5+5+2+7+6+
Color Identity Spread
4.0% Esper
-
Orzhov 645 · 59.1%
-
Abzan 181 · 16.6%
-
Five-Color 98 · 9.0%
-
Mardu 91 · 8.3%
-
Esper 44 · 4.0%
- Other (13) 33 · 3.0%
Commanders
Most Relevant
Cruel Somnophage // Can't Wake Up 43.2% of decks
Cruel Somnophage // Can't Wake Up 43.2% of decks
Horn of Valhalla // Ysgard's Call 29.5% of decks
Horn of Valhalla // Ysgard's Call 29.5% of decks
Animating Faerie // Bring to Life 22.7% of decks
Animating Faerie // Bring to Life 22.7% of decks
Lord Skitter, Sewer King 22.7% of decks
Lord Skitter, Sewer King 22.7% of decks
Talion's Messenger 25.0% of decks
Talion's Messenger 25.0% of decks
Hypnotic Sprite // Mesmeric Glare 36.4% of decks
Hypnotic Sprite // Mesmeric Glare 36.4% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.71 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
- Halfdane relevance 0.54 · 1.1% (1 of 95 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cruel Somnophage // Can't Wake Up relevance 2.46 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- Horn of Valhalla // Ysgard's Call relevance 1.98 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Animating Faerie // Bring to Life relevance 1.56 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Lord Skitter, Sewer King relevance 1.47 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Talion's Messenger relevance 1.38 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
- Hypnotic Sprite // Mesmeric Glare relevance 1.35 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Faerie Bladecrafter relevance 1.33 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Foulmire Knight // Profane Insight relevance 1.32 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Sprite Noble relevance 1.30 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Virtue of Persistence // Locthwain Scorn relevance 1.20 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Order of Midnight // Alter Fate relevance 1.19 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 1.18 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor relevance 1.11 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Vampiric Rites relevance 1.11 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Alela, Artful Provocateur relevance 1.09 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Glen Elendra Liege relevance 1.08 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
- Faerie Trickery relevance 1.06 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
- Hildibrand Manderville // Gentleman's Rise relevance 1.04 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Oona, Queen of the Fae relevance 1.01 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 1.01 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Zur the Enchanter relevance 0.95 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Intangible Virtue relevance 0.92 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.87 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Splinter's Technique relevance 0.85 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Blood Artist relevance 0.78 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.78 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Consuming Aberration relevance 0.77 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
- Deny the Witch relevance 0.77 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Pitiless Plunderer relevance 0.75 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.63 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
All creatures (21)
- Cruel Somnophage // Can't Wake Up relevance 2.46 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- Animating Faerie // Bring to Life relevance 1.56 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Lord Skitter, Sewer King relevance 1.47 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Talion's Messenger relevance 1.38 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
- Hypnotic Sprite // Mesmeric Glare relevance 1.35 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Faerie Bladecrafter relevance 1.33 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Foulmire Knight // Profane Insight relevance 1.32 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Sprite Noble relevance 1.30 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Order of Midnight // Alter Fate relevance 1.19 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 1.18 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor relevance 1.11 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Alela, Artful Provocateur relevance 1.09 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Glen Elendra Liege relevance 1.08 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
- Hildibrand Manderville // Gentleman's Rise relevance 1.04 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Oona, Queen of the Fae relevance 1.01 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 1.01 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Zur the Enchanter relevance 0.95 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Blood Artist relevance 0.78 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Consuming Aberration relevance 0.77 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
- Pitiless Plunderer relevance 0.75 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Murderous Rider // Swift End relevance 0.62 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Horn of Valhalla // Ysgard's Call relevance 1.98 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.78 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.63 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.56 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Virtue of Persistence // Locthwain Scorn relevance 1.20 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Vampiric Rites relevance 1.11 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Intangible Virtue relevance 0.92 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.87 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Anointed Procession relevance 0.53 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
All instants (5)
- Faerie Trickery relevance 1.06 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
- Deny the Witch relevance 0.77 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.61 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.58 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.49 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Splinter's Technique relevance 0.85 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Damn relevance 0.47 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Restless Fortress relevance 1.90 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 1.30 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Castle Locthwain relevance 1.17 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
- Mortuary Mire relevance 0.96 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.91 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Temple of Silence relevance 0.62 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Vault of the Archangel relevance 0.51 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
All lands (6)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.96 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
- Orzhov Basilica relevance 0.81 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.64 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.59 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
- Darkwater Catacombs relevance 0.54 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.47 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
EDH data for Devouring Sugarmaw // Have for Dinner: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 44 real decks.
















































