Devouring Sugarmaw // Have for Dinner
Played in 631 Orzhov decks
Color Identity Spread
59.1% Orzhov
-
Orzhov 631 · 59.1%
-
Abzan 176 · 16.5%
-
Five-Color 95 · 8.9%
-
Mardu 91 · 8.5%
-
Esper 42 · 3.9%
- Other (13) 33 · 3.1%
1430+34+1+3+12+
That's every commander.
All commanders (14)
- Abigale, Eloquent First-Year relevance 4.18 · 10.7% (398 of 3,714 decks)
- Vito, Fanatic of Aclazotz relevance 1.33 · 3.2% (15 of 476 decks)
- Neva, Stalked by Nightmares relevance 0.92 · 2.6% (7 of 270 decks)
- Denethor, Ruling Steward relevance 0.86 · 3.2% (5 of 156 decks)
- Haunted One // Ellyn Harbreeze, Busybody relevance 0.84 · 6.4% (3 of 47 decks)
- Baron Bertram Graywater relevance 0.66 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Sarevok, Deathbringer // Far Traveler relevance 0.62 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Judge Magister Gabranth relevance 0.59 · 1.3% (5 of 386 decks)
- Shadowheart, Dark Justiciar // Flaming Fist relevance 0.54 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Noble Heritage // Safana, Calimport Cutthroat relevance 0.52 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Cultist of the Absolute // Lulu, Loyal Hollyphant relevance 0.44 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Agent of the Iron Throne // Ellyn Harbreeze, Busybody relevance 0.42 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Arvad the Cursed relevance 0.22 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
- Wernog, Rider's Chaplain relevance 0.21 · 1.1% (1 of 90 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Kalakscion, Hunger Tyrant relevance 2.49 · 56.9% (359 of 631 decks)
- Shakedown Heavy relevance 2.47 · 55.5% (350 of 631 decks)
- Lupine Prototype relevance 2.42 · 53.9% (340 of 631 decks)
- Relic Golem relevance 2.39 · 52.1% (329 of 631 decks)
- Nyxathid relevance 2.38 · 52.5% (331 of 631 decks)
- Yargle, Glutton of Urborg relevance 2.33 · 49.4% (312 of 631 decks)
- Woolly Razorback relevance 2.26 · 47.2% (298 of 631 decks)
- Rotting Regisaur relevance 2.22 · 51.2% (323 of 631 decks)
- Traxos, Scourge of Kroog relevance 2.21 · 47.1% (297 of 631 decks)
- Plague Reaver relevance 2.12 · 42.3% (267 of 631 decks)
- Egon, God of Death // Throne of Death relevance 2.06 · 42.5% (268 of 631 decks)
- Archfiend of the Dross relevance 2.03 · 40.1% (253 of 631 decks)
- Xu-Ifit, Osteoharmonist relevance 2.00 · 47.2% (298 of 631 decks)
- Rot-Curse Rakshasa relevance 1.94 · 44.8% (283 of 631 decks)
- Desecration Demon relevance 1.93 · 36.5% (230 of 631 decks)
- Monoist Sentry relevance 1.91 · 41.5% (262 of 631 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 1.80 · 39.9% (252 of 631 decks)
- Waning Wurm relevance 1.78 · 36.0% (227 of 631 decks)
- Hunted Bonebrute relevance 1.56 · 34.7% (219 of 631 decks)
- Personify relevance 1.49 · 39.8% (251 of 631 decks)
- Flicker of Fate relevance 1.43 · 42.9% (271 of 631 decks)
- Cloudshift relevance 1.43 · 50.9% (321 of 631 decks)
- Abyssal Persecutor relevance 1.40 · 26.1% (165 of 631 decks)
- Flesh Reaver relevance 1.35 · 25.0% (158 of 631 decks)
- Flickerwisp relevance 1.34 · 38.2% (241 of 631 decks)
- Parting Gust relevance 1.33 · 42.6% (269 of 631 decks)
- Far Traveler relevance 1.32 · 33.1% (209 of 631 decks)
- Airbender Ascension relevance 1.26 · 35.2% (222 of 631 decks)
- Charming Prince relevance 1.21 · 36.6% (231 of 631 decks)
- Justiciar's Portal relevance 1.19 · 26.6% (168 of 631 decks)
All creatures (34)
- Kalakscion, Hunger Tyrant relevance 2.49 · 56.9% (359 of 631 decks)
- Shakedown Heavy relevance 2.47 · 55.5% (350 of 631 decks)
- Lupine Prototype relevance 2.42 · 53.9% (340 of 631 decks)
- Relic Golem relevance 2.39 · 52.1% (329 of 631 decks)
- Nyxathid relevance 2.38 · 52.5% (331 of 631 decks)
- Yargle, Glutton of Urborg relevance 2.33 · 49.4% (312 of 631 decks)
- Woolly Razorback relevance 2.26 · 47.2% (298 of 631 decks)
- Rotting Regisaur relevance 2.22 · 51.2% (323 of 631 decks)
- Traxos, Scourge of Kroog relevance 2.21 · 47.1% (297 of 631 decks)
- Plague Reaver relevance 2.12 · 42.3% (267 of 631 decks)
- Egon, God of Death // Throne of Death relevance 2.06 · 42.5% (268 of 631 decks)
- Archfiend of the Dross relevance 2.03 · 40.1% (253 of 631 decks)
- Xu-Ifit, Osteoharmonist relevance 2.00 · 47.2% (298 of 631 decks)
- Rot-Curse Rakshasa relevance 1.94 · 44.8% (283 of 631 decks)
- Desecration Demon relevance 1.93 · 36.5% (230 of 631 decks)
- Monoist Sentry relevance 1.91 · 41.5% (262 of 631 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 1.80 · 39.9% (252 of 631 decks)
- Waning Wurm relevance 1.78 · 36.0% (227 of 631 decks)
- Hunted Bonebrute relevance 1.56 · 34.7% (219 of 631 decks)
- Abyssal Persecutor relevance 1.40 · 26.1% (165 of 631 decks)
- Flesh Reaver relevance 1.35 · 25.0% (158 of 631 decks)
- Flickerwisp relevance 1.34 · 38.2% (241 of 631 decks)
- Charming Prince relevance 1.21 · 36.6% (231 of 631 decks)
- Alms Beast relevance 1.13 · 17.3% (109 of 631 decks)
- Gilraen, Dúnedain Protector relevance 1.11 · 27.3% (172 of 631 decks)
- Disciple of Bolas relevance 1.08 · 28.7% (181 of 631 decks)
- Yathan Tombguard relevance 1.07 · 26.0% (164 of 631 decks)
- Master of the Feast relevance 1.05 · 17.9% (113 of 631 decks)
- Hunted Horror relevance 1.05 · 26.5% (167 of 631 decks)
- Clackbridge Troll relevance 1.03 · 22.2% (140 of 631 decks)
- Restoration Angel relevance 1.02 · 30.0% (189 of 631 decks)
- Desecration Elemental relevance 0.94 · 16.3% (103 of 631 decks)
- Eldrazi Displacer relevance 0.85 · 17.9% (113 of 631 decks)
- Phelia, Exuberant Shepherd relevance 0.82 · 24.7% (156 of 631 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 1.14 · 35.8% (226 of 631 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Far Traveler relevance 1.32 · 33.1% (209 of 631 decks)
- Airbender Ascension relevance 1.26 · 35.2% (222 of 631 decks)
- Teleportation Circle relevance 0.98 · 32.3% (204 of 631 decks)
All instants (12)
- Personify relevance 1.49 · 39.8% (251 of 631 decks)
- Flicker of Fate relevance 1.43 · 42.9% (271 of 631 decks)
- Cloudshift relevance 1.43 · 50.9% (321 of 631 decks)
- Parting Gust relevance 1.33 · 42.6% (269 of 631 decks)
- Justiciar's Portal relevance 1.19 · 26.6% (168 of 631 decks)
- Slip On the Ring relevance 1.13 · 28.2% (178 of 631 decks)
- Getaway Glamer relevance 1.11 · 26.3% (166 of 631 decks)
- Otherworldly Journey relevance 1.02 · 21.4% (135 of 631 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 1.00 · 37.6% (237 of 631 decks)
- Long Road Home relevance 1.00 · 18.7% (118 of 631 decks)
- Scrollshift relevance 0.98 · 23.1% (146 of 631 decks)
- Acrobatic Maneuver relevance 0.96 · 22.2% (140 of 631 decks)
EDH data for Devouring Sugarmaw // Have for Dinner: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 631 real decks.






















































