Predatory Focus
Played in 54 Naya decks
130+21+3+4+2+1+8+11+
Color Identity Spread
2.2% Naya
-
Green 1,888 · 75.7%
-
Golgari 177 · 7.1%
-
Gruul 101 · 4.1%
-
Simic 64 · 2.6%
-
Selesnya 63 · 2.5%
-
Naya 54 · 2.2%
- Other (9) 146 · 5.9%
Commanders
Most Relevant
Brave the Sands 14.8% of decks
Brave the Sands 14.8% of decks
Etali, Primal Storm 31.5% of decks
Etali, Primal Storm 31.5% of decks
Commander's Sphere 20.4% of decks
Commander's Sphere 20.4% of decks
Wakening Sun's Avatar 24.1% of decks
Wakening Sun's Avatar 24.1% of decks
Verdant Sun's Avatar 22.2% of decks
Verdant Sun's Avatar 22.2% of decks
Zetalpa, Primal Dawn 24.1% of decks
Zetalpa, Primal Dawn 24.1% of decks
All commanders (1)
- Johan relevance 0.85 · 1.3% (2 of 153 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Brave the Sands relevance 0.68 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.54 · 31.5% (17 of 54 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.53 · 20.4% (11 of 54 decks)
- Wakening Sun's Avatar relevance 0.53 · 24.1% (13 of 54 decks)
- Verdant Sun's Avatar relevance 0.53 · 22.2% (12 of 54 decks)
- Zetalpa, Primal Dawn relevance 0.53 · 24.1% (13 of 54 decks)
- Knight of the Stampede relevance 0.51 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.50 · 24.1% (13 of 54 decks)
- Silverclad Ferocidons relevance 0.48 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Otepec Huntmaster relevance 0.46 · 20.4% (11 of 54 decks)
- Naya Charm relevance 0.46 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.44 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Ghalta and Mavren relevance 0.43 · 20.4% (11 of 54 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.42 · 22.2% (12 of 54 decks)
- Thrashing Brontodon relevance 0.41 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.41 · 29.6% (16 of 54 decks)
- Taurean Mauler relevance 0.40 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 0.40 · 22.2% (12 of 54 decks)
- Temple Altisaur relevance 0.40 · 18.5% (10 of 54 decks)
- Descendants' Path relevance 0.39 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.38 · 25.9% (14 of 54 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.38 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Regal Behemoth relevance 0.35 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.35 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 0.35 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.34 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Kinjalli's Sunwing relevance 0.34 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.33 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Regisaur Alpha relevance 0.33 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.30 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
All creatures (21)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.54 · 31.5% (17 of 54 decks)
- Wakening Sun's Avatar relevance 0.53 · 24.1% (13 of 54 decks)
- Verdant Sun's Avatar relevance 0.53 · 22.2% (12 of 54 decks)
- Zetalpa, Primal Dawn relevance 0.53 · 24.1% (13 of 54 decks)
- Knight of the Stampede relevance 0.51 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Silverclad Ferocidons relevance 0.48 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Otepec Huntmaster relevance 0.46 · 20.4% (11 of 54 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.44 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Ghalta and Mavren relevance 0.43 · 20.4% (11 of 54 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.42 · 22.2% (12 of 54 decks)
- Thrashing Brontodon relevance 0.41 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Taurean Mauler relevance 0.40 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 0.40 · 22.2% (12 of 54 decks)
- Temple Altisaur relevance 0.40 · 18.5% (10 of 54 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.38 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Regal Behemoth relevance 0.35 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 0.35 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.34 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Kinjalli's Sunwing relevance 0.34 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.33 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Regisaur Alpha relevance 0.33 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.53 · 20.4% (11 of 54 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.41 · 29.6% (16 of 54 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.35 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Brave the Sands relevance 0.68 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.50 · 24.1% (13 of 54 decks)
- Descendants' Path relevance 0.39 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.38 · 25.9% (14 of 54 decks)
All instants (2)
- Naya Charm relevance 0.46 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.30 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Austere Command relevance 0.29 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
All utility lands (8)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.60 · 42.6% (23 of 54 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.54 · 18.5% (10 of 54 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.50 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.45 · 18.5% (10 of 54 decks)
- Temple of Triumph relevance 0.45 · 18.5% (10 of 54 decks)
- Sheltering Landscape relevance 0.42 · 18.5% (10 of 54 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.41 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.33 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
All lands (11)
- Thriving Bluff relevance 0.62 · 20.4% (11 of 54 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.59 · 20.4% (11 of 54 decks)
- Rith's Grove relevance 0.59 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.44 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.44 · 25.9% (14 of 54 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.42 · 18.5% (10 of 54 decks)
- Sunbillow Verge relevance 0.41 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.40 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.37 · 24.1% (13 of 54 decks)
- Furycalm Snarl relevance 0.36 · 20.4% (11 of 54 decks)
- Game Trail relevance 0.35 · 22.2% (12 of 54 decks)
EDH data for Predatory Focus: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 54 real decks.













































