Predatory Focus
Played in 101 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
4.2% Gruul
-
Green 1,812 · 75.3%
-
Golgari 173 · 7.2%
-
Gruul 101 · 4.2%
-
Selesnya 63 · 2.6%
-
Simic 63 · 2.6%
-
Naya 51 · 2.1%
- Other (9) 144 · 6.0%
630+19+6+7+5+5+1+3+4+
That's every commander.
All commanders (6)
- Borborygmos relevance 1.79 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Ignacio of Myra's Marvels // Hardy of Myra's Marvels relevance 0.68 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- The Lady of the Mountain relevance 0.49 · 2.1% (1 of 47 decks)
- Acolyte of Bahamut // Livaan, Cultist of Tiamat relevance 0.47 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Guild Artisan // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.44 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
- Kraven, Proud Predator relevance 0.40 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Rubblebelt Raiders relevance 0.67 · 11.9% (12 of 101 decks)
- Indomitable Might relevance 0.63 · 12.9% (13 of 101 decks)
- Armed // Dangerous relevance 0.61 · 11.9% (12 of 101 decks)
- Sunder Shaman relevance 0.58 · 12.9% (13 of 101 decks)
- Outmaneuver relevance 0.57 · 9.9% (10 of 101 decks)
- Proud Wildbonder relevance 0.55 · 12.9% (13 of 101 decks)
- Gruul Spellbreaker relevance 0.55 · 9.9% (10 of 101 decks)
- Burning-Tree Shaman relevance 0.54 · 8.9% (9 of 101 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.52 · 35.6% (36 of 101 decks)
- Wasteland Viper relevance 0.52 · 7.9% (8 of 101 decks)
- Skarrg Guildmage relevance 0.51 · 8.9% (9 of 101 decks)
- Lure relevance 0.51 · 11.9% (12 of 101 decks)
- Rubblehulk relevance 0.49 · 9.9% (10 of 101 decks)
- Savage Twister relevance 0.49 · 9.9% (10 of 101 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 0.49 · 8.9% (9 of 101 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 0.49 · 11.9% (12 of 101 decks)
- Taunting Elf relevance 0.48 · 8.9% (9 of 101 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.47 · 12.9% (13 of 101 decks)
- Mage Slayer relevance 0.47 · 15.8% (16 of 101 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.47 · 15.8% (16 of 101 decks)
- Gruul Charm relevance 0.47 · 10.9% (11 of 101 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.46 · 14.9% (15 of 101 decks)
- Roar of Challenge relevance 0.45 · 10.9% (11 of 101 decks)
- Gruul Cluestone relevance 0.45 · 8.9% (9 of 101 decks)
- Domri, Chaos Bringer relevance 0.44 · 8.9% (9 of 101 decks)
- Gruul War Chant relevance 0.44 · 14.9% (15 of 101 decks)
- Ruby, Daring Tracker relevance 0.43 · 18.8% (19 of 101 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.43 · 27.7% (28 of 101 decks)
- Ravager Wurm relevance 0.42 · 7.9% (8 of 101 decks)
- Ghor-Clan Rampager relevance 0.42 · 7.9% (8 of 101 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Rubblebelt Raiders relevance 0.67 · 11.9% (12 of 101 decks)
- Sunder Shaman relevance 0.58 · 12.9% (13 of 101 decks)
- Proud Wildbonder relevance 0.55 · 12.9% (13 of 101 decks)
- Gruul Spellbreaker relevance 0.55 · 9.9% (10 of 101 decks)
- Burning-Tree Shaman relevance 0.54 · 8.9% (9 of 101 decks)
- Wasteland Viper relevance 0.52 · 7.9% (8 of 101 decks)
- Skarrg Guildmage relevance 0.51 · 8.9% (9 of 101 decks)
- Rubblehulk relevance 0.49 · 9.9% (10 of 101 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 0.49 · 8.9% (9 of 101 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 0.49 · 11.9% (12 of 101 decks)
- Taunting Elf relevance 0.48 · 8.9% (9 of 101 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.46 · 14.9% (15 of 101 decks)
- Ruby, Daring Tracker relevance 0.43 · 18.8% (19 of 101 decks)
- Ravager Wurm relevance 0.42 · 7.9% (8 of 101 decks)
- Ghor-Clan Rampager relevance 0.42 · 7.9% (8 of 101 decks)
- Burning-Tree Emissary relevance 0.41 · 7.9% (8 of 101 decks)
- General Marhault Elsdragon relevance 0.41 · 9.9% (10 of 101 decks)
- Wild Cantor relevance 0.38 · 9.9% (10 of 101 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.38 · 10.9% (11 of 101 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.47 · 12.9% (13 of 101 decks)
- Mage Slayer relevance 0.47 · 15.8% (16 of 101 decks)
- Gruul Cluestone relevance 0.45 · 8.9% (9 of 101 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.43 · 27.7% (28 of 101 decks)
- Nemesis Mask relevance 0.41 · 7.9% (8 of 101 decks)
- Dolmen Gate relevance 0.38 · 10.9% (11 of 101 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Indomitable Might relevance 0.63 · 12.9% (13 of 101 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.52 · 35.6% (36 of 101 decks)
- Lure relevance 0.51 · 11.9% (12 of 101 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.47 · 15.8% (16 of 101 decks)
- Gruul War Chant relevance 0.44 · 14.9% (15 of 101 decks)
- Cindervines relevance 0.42 · 11.9% (12 of 101 decks)
- Berserkers' Onslaught relevance 0.40 · 17.8% (18 of 101 decks)
All instants (5)
- Outmaneuver relevance 0.57 · 9.9% (10 of 101 decks)
- Gruul Charm relevance 0.47 · 10.9% (11 of 101 decks)
- Signal the Clans relevance 0.42 · 9.9% (10 of 101 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.41 · 13.9% (14 of 101 decks)
- You Look Upon the Tarrasque relevance 0.40 · 8.9% (9 of 101 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Armed // Dangerous relevance 0.61 · 11.9% (12 of 101 decks)
- Savage Twister relevance 0.49 · 9.9% (10 of 101 decks)
- Roar of Challenge relevance 0.45 · 10.9% (11 of 101 decks)
- Irresistible Prey relevance 0.41 · 9.9% (10 of 101 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.39 · 9.9% (10 of 101 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Domri, Chaos Bringer relevance 0.44 · 8.9% (9 of 101 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Skarrg, the Rage Pits relevance 0.55 · 22.8% (23 of 101 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.53 · 37.6% (38 of 101 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.43 · 31.7% (32 of 101 decks)
All lands (4)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.81 · 25.7% (26 of 101 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.50 · 21.8% (22 of 101 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.47 · 30.7% (31 of 101 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.41 · 22.8% (23 of 101 decks)
EDH data for Predatory Focus: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 101 real decks.



























































