Giant Octopus
Played in 101 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
33.6% Blue
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (13)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 2.69 · 12.7% (13 of 102 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 2.45 · 8.0% (13 of 163 decks)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 1.82 · 6.0% (7 of 116 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.73 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.18 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Stockman, Mad Fly-entist relevance 0.72 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Shameless Charlatan // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.64 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Tromokratis relevance 0.63 · 1.1% (2 of 177 decks)
- Alora, Merry Thief // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.62 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 0.62 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Shameless Charlatan relevance 0.48 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.46 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.38 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 2.32 · 36.6% (37 of 101 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 2.11 · 40.6% (41 of 101 decks)
- Sealock Monster relevance 1.81 · 26.7% (27 of 101 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.73 · 33.7% (34 of 101 decks)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 1.61 · 25.7% (26 of 101 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 1.52 · 26.7% (27 of 101 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 1.49 · 25.7% (26 of 101 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 1.45 · 22.8% (23 of 101 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.40 · 27.7% (28 of 101 decks)
- Kraken Hatchling relevance 1.39 · 23.8% (24 of 101 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.29 · 22.8% (23 of 101 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 1.29 · 20.8% (21 of 101 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.24 · 21.8% (22 of 101 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 1.19 · 17.8% (18 of 101 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 1.17 · 23.8% (24 of 101 decks)
- Manta Ray relevance 1.16 · 16.8% (17 of 101 decks)
- Kraken of the Straits relevance 1.11 · 19.8% (20 of 101 decks)
- Flying Dolphin-Fish relevance 1.09 · 16.8% (17 of 101 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.09 · 30.7% (31 of 101 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.09 · 19.8% (20 of 101 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.05 · 19.8% (20 of 101 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 1.04 · 16.8% (17 of 101 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 1.04 · 18.8% (19 of 101 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 1.03 · 22.8% (23 of 101 decks)
- Ancient Crab relevance 0.99 · 17.8% (18 of 101 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 0.97 · 18.8% (19 of 101 decks)
- Sigiled Starfish relevance 0.97 · 18.8% (19 of 101 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 0.96 · 15.8% (16 of 101 decks)
- Sleep with the Fishes relevance 0.94 · 14.9% (15 of 101 decks)
- Coral Barrier relevance 0.92 · 13.9% (14 of 101 decks)
All creatures (41)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 2.32 · 36.6% (37 of 101 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 2.11 · 40.6% (41 of 101 decks)
- Sealock Monster relevance 1.81 · 26.7% (27 of 101 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.73 · 33.7% (34 of 101 decks)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 1.61 · 25.7% (26 of 101 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 1.52 · 26.7% (27 of 101 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 1.49 · 25.7% (26 of 101 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 1.45 · 22.8% (23 of 101 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.40 · 27.7% (28 of 101 decks)
- Kraken Hatchling relevance 1.39 · 23.8% (24 of 101 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.29 · 22.8% (23 of 101 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 1.29 · 20.8% (21 of 101 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.24 · 21.8% (22 of 101 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 1.19 · 17.8% (18 of 101 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 1.17 · 23.8% (24 of 101 decks)
- Manta Ray relevance 1.16 · 16.8% (17 of 101 decks)
- Kraken of the Straits relevance 1.11 · 19.8% (20 of 101 decks)
- Flying Dolphin-Fish relevance 1.09 · 16.8% (17 of 101 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.09 · 19.8% (20 of 101 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.05 · 19.8% (20 of 101 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 1.04 · 16.8% (17 of 101 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 1.04 · 18.8% (19 of 101 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 1.03 · 22.8% (23 of 101 decks)
- Ancient Crab relevance 0.99 · 17.8% (18 of 101 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 0.97 · 18.8% (19 of 101 decks)
- Sigiled Starfish relevance 0.97 · 18.8% (19 of 101 decks)
- Coral Barrier relevance 0.92 · 13.9% (14 of 101 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 0.92 · 20.8% (21 of 101 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.91 · 16.8% (17 of 101 decks)
- Voracious Greatshark relevance 0.90 · 16.8% (17 of 101 decks)
- Shorecomber Crab relevance 0.86 · 14.9% (15 of 101 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 0.86 · 17.8% (18 of 101 decks)
- Stinging Lionfish relevance 0.84 · 16.8% (17 of 101 decks)
- Reef Worm relevance 0.83 · 17.8% (18 of 101 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.83 · 16.8% (17 of 101 decks)
- Moat Piranhas relevance 0.82 · 11.9% (12 of 101 decks)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 0.81 · 25.7% (26 of 101 decks)
- Giant Koi relevance 0.81 · 14.9% (15 of 101 decks)
- Colossal Whale relevance 0.80 · 16.8% (17 of 101 decks)
- Shipbreaker Kraken relevance 0.80 · 14.9% (15 of 101 decks)
- Horseshoe Crab relevance 0.79 · 14.9% (15 of 101 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Kraken's Eye relevance 0.79 · 14.9% (15 of 101 decks)
- Fishing Pole relevance 0.77 · 12.9% (13 of 101 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 0.96 · 15.8% (16 of 101 decks)
- Sleep with the Fishes relevance 0.94 · 14.9% (15 of 101 decks)
- Octopus Umbra relevance 0.83 · 14.9% (15 of 101 decks)
- Quest for Ula's Temple relevance 0.76 · 12.9% (13 of 101 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.09 · 30.7% (31 of 101 decks)
- Crush of Tentacles relevance 0.89 · 16.8% (17 of 101 decks)
All lands (1)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.95 · 25.7% (26 of 101 decks)
EDH data for Giant Octopus: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 101 real decks.