Think Tank
Played in 123 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
12.0% Blue
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (12)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 3.03 · 5.6% (38 of 675 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 2.81 · 11.0% (18 of 163 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 1.76 · 1.3% (22 of 1,683 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.12 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Rayne, Academy Chancellor relevance 0.85 · 1.8% (3 of 171 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro relevance 0.59 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Hakim, Loreweaver relevance 0.57 · 1.1% (2 of 190 decks)
- Proft, Consulting Detective relevance 0.52 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Yuriko, Hope from the Shadows relevance 0.46 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Leader, Super-Genius relevance 0.43 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.42 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.36 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Mindwhisker relevance 1.72 · 29.3% (36 of 123 decks)
- Essence Anchor relevance 1.48 · 23.6% (29 of 123 decks)
- Eyes Everywhere relevance 1.42 · 24.4% (30 of 123 decks)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 1.38 · 22.0% (27 of 123 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 1.37 · 23.6% (29 of 123 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 1.36 · 22.0% (27 of 123 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 1.36 · 36.6% (45 of 123 decks)
- Sigiled Starfish relevance 1.34 · 26.0% (32 of 123 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 1.28 · 26.0% (32 of 123 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 1.25 · 18.7% (23 of 123 decks)
- Case of the Shifting Visage relevance 1.24 · 21.1% (26 of 123 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 1.20 · 21.1% (26 of 123 decks)
- Plagiarize relevance 1.18 · 18.7% (23 of 123 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 1.13 · 18.7% (23 of 123 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 1.12 · 20.3% (25 of 123 decks)
- Geist of the Archives relevance 1.05 · 17.1% (21 of 123 decks)
- Rune-Sealed Wall relevance 1.03 · 18.7% (23 of 123 decks)
- Mission Briefing relevance 1.02 · 27.6% (34 of 123 decks)
- Cruel Witness relevance 1.02 · 16.3% (20 of 123 decks)
- Curate relevance 1.01 · 25.2% (31 of 123 decks)
- Il Mheg Pixie relevance 1.00 · 17.9% (22 of 123 decks)
- Nightveil Sprite relevance 0.99 · 17.1% (21 of 123 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 0.96 · 26.8% (33 of 123 decks)
- Sinister Sabotage relevance 0.94 · 20.3% (25 of 123 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.91 · 22.8% (28 of 123 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.91 · 28.5% (35 of 123 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.90 · 17.1% (21 of 123 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.88 · 45.5% (56 of 123 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.88 · 20.3% (25 of 123 decks)
- Elvish Mariner relevance 0.88 · 15.4% (19 of 123 decks)
All creatures (21)
- Mindwhisker relevance 1.72 · 29.3% (36 of 123 decks)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 1.38 · 22.0% (27 of 123 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 1.37 · 23.6% (29 of 123 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 1.36 · 22.0% (27 of 123 decks)
- Sigiled Starfish relevance 1.34 · 26.0% (32 of 123 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 1.28 · 26.0% (32 of 123 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 1.25 · 18.7% (23 of 123 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 1.20 · 21.1% (26 of 123 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 1.12 · 20.3% (25 of 123 decks)
- Geist of the Archives relevance 1.05 · 17.1% (21 of 123 decks)
- Rune-Sealed Wall relevance 1.03 · 18.7% (23 of 123 decks)
- Cruel Witness relevance 1.02 · 16.3% (20 of 123 decks)
- Il Mheg Pixie relevance 1.00 · 17.9% (22 of 123 decks)
- Nightveil Sprite relevance 0.99 · 17.1% (21 of 123 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 0.96 · 26.8% (33 of 123 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.90 · 17.1% (21 of 123 decks)
- Elvish Mariner relevance 0.88 · 15.4% (19 of 123 decks)
- Watcher of Hours relevance 0.85 · 13.8% (17 of 123 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.84 · 17.1% (21 of 123 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 0.78 · 14.6% (18 of 123 decks)
- Cryptic Annelid relevance 0.72 · 13.0% (16 of 123 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Essence Anchor relevance 1.48 · 23.6% (29 of 123 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.73 · 18.7% (23 of 123 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Eyes Everywhere relevance 1.42 · 24.4% (30 of 123 decks)
- Case of the Shifting Visage relevance 1.24 · 21.1% (26 of 123 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 1.13 · 18.7% (23 of 123 decks)
- Enhanced Surveillance relevance 0.86 · 13.0% (16 of 123 decks)
- Mystic Redaction relevance 0.82 · 15.4% (19 of 123 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.75 · 21.1% (26 of 123 decks)
All instants (10)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 1.36 · 36.6% (45 of 123 decks)
- Plagiarize relevance 1.18 · 18.7% (23 of 123 decks)
- Mission Briefing relevance 1.02 · 27.6% (34 of 123 decks)
- Curate relevance 1.01 · 25.2% (31 of 123 decks)
- Sinister Sabotage relevance 0.94 · 20.3% (25 of 123 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.91 · 22.8% (28 of 123 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.88 · 45.5% (56 of 123 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.88 · 20.3% (25 of 123 decks)
- Unauthorized Exit relevance 0.85 · 17.1% (21 of 123 decks)
- Banishing Betrayal relevance 0.73 · 14.6% (18 of 123 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.91 · 28.5% (35 of 123 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.87 · 33.3% (41 of 123 decks)
- Taigam's Scheming relevance 0.83 · 13.8% (17 of 123 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.88 · 17.9% (22 of 123 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.88 · 18.7% (23 of 123 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.88 · 17.9% (22 of 123 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.88 · 36.6% (45 of 123 decks)
- The Grey Havens relevance 0.87 · 17.1% (21 of 123 decks)
- Gallifrey Council Chamber relevance 0.85 · 13.8% (17 of 123 decks)
- Zhalfirin Void relevance 0.83 · 17.9% (22 of 123 decks)
All lands (1)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 1.06 · 26.0% (32 of 123 decks)
EDH data for Think Tank: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 123 real decks.