2630+31+6+5+4+1+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
3.0% Blue
-
Five-Color 4,132 · 62.3%
-
Bant 782 · 11.8%
-
Jeskai 575 · 8.7%
-
Izzet 263 · 4.0%
-
Azorius 262 · 3.9%
-
Blue 200 · 3.0%
- Other (15) 421 · 6.3%
Commanders
Kitsune, Dragon's Daughter 3.8% of decks
Kitsune, Dragon's Daughter 3.8% of decks
Madame Web, Clairvoyant 20.0% of decks
Madame Web, Clairvoyant 20.0% of decks
Jarvis, Earth's Mightiest Butler 50.0% of decks
Jarvis, Earth's Mightiest Butler 50.0% of decks
The Blue Spirit 1.8% of decks
The Blue Spirit 1.8% of decks
Lyla, Holographic Assistant 3.0% of decks
Lyla, Holographic Assistant 3.0% of decks
Ty Lee, Chi Blocker 3.7% of decks
Ty Lee, Chi Blocker 3.7% of decks
Most Relevant
Ultimecia, Temporal Threat 21.5% of decks
Ultimecia, Temporal Threat 21.5% of decks
Grazilaxx, Illithid Scholar 23.5% of decks
Grazilaxx, Illithid Scholar 23.5% of decks
Enduring Curiosity 33.5% of decks
Enduring Curiosity 33.5% of decks
Hide on the Ceiling 22.5% of decks
Hide on the Ceiling 22.5% of decks
Spider-Byte, Web Warden 13.0% of decks
Spider-Byte, Web Warden 13.0% of decks
Impostor Syndrome 20.0% of decks
Impostor Syndrome 20.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (26)
- Kitsune, Dragon's Daughter relevance 1.89 · 3.8% (16 of 425 decks)
- Madame Web, Clairvoyant relevance 1.75 · 20.0% (5 of 25 decks)
- Jarvis, Earth's Mightiest Butler relevance 1.59 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- The Blue Spirit relevance 1.22 · 1.8% (9 of 514 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 1.21 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Ty Lee, Chi Blocker relevance 1.19 · 3.7% (5 of 134 decks)
- Leader, Super-Genius relevance 1.02 · 5.5% (3 of 55 decks)
- Blue Marvel, Adam Brashear relevance 1.00 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger relevance 0.90 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Ms. Marvel, Kamala Khan relevance 0.87 · 1.1% (6 of 549 decks)
- Grazilaxx, Illithid Scholar relevance 0.71 · 1.1% (4 of 372 decks)
- Adric, Mathematical Genius relevance 0.68 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.65 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Pol Jamaar, Illusionist relevance 0.64 · 2.4% (2 of 84 decks)
- Silver Surfer, Cosmic Voyager relevance 0.62 · 2.1% (2 of 95 decks)
- Justice, Vance Astrovik relevance 0.54 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Wiccan, Rising Magician relevance 0.51 · 1.2% (2 of 161 decks)
- K-9, Mark I relevance 0.49 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.47 · 1.0% (2 of 198 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 0.44 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Doc Ock, Sinister Scientist relevance 0.43 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.34 · 1.5% (1 of 68 decks)
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment relevance 0.34 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
- Dungeon Delver // Imoen, Mystic Trickster relevance 0.32 · 1.2% (1 of 81 decks)
- Lockjaw, Slobbering Teleporter relevance 0.31 · 1.1% (1 of 90 decks)
- Alirios, Enraptured relevance 0.31 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ultimecia, Temporal Threat relevance 0.98 · 21.5% (43 of 200 decks)
- Grazilaxx, Illithid Scholar relevance 0.96 · 23.5% (47 of 200 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.89 · 33.5% (67 of 200 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.82 · 22.5% (45 of 200 decks)
- Spider-Byte, Web Warden relevance 0.81 · 13.0% (26 of 200 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.81 · 20.0% (40 of 200 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.68 · 25.0% (50 of 200 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.68 · 32.5% (65 of 200 decks)
- Jill, Shiva's Dominant // Shiva, Warden of Ice relevance 0.67 · 15.5% (31 of 200 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.63 · 18.5% (37 of 200 decks)
- Broodbirth Viper relevance 0.61 · 10.5% (21 of 200 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.61 · 20.5% (41 of 200 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.61 · 21.0% (42 of 200 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.60 · 16.0% (32 of 200 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.59 · 18.5% (37 of 200 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.59 · 16.5% (33 of 200 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.58 · 16.5% (33 of 200 decks)
- Defiler of Dreams relevance 0.55 · 19.5% (39 of 200 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.54 · 17.5% (35 of 200 decks)
- The Indomitable relevance 0.53 · 13.5% (27 of 200 decks)
- Identity Thief relevance 0.52 · 9.0% (18 of 200 decks)
- Trusted Advisor relevance 0.52 · 8.0% (16 of 200 decks)
- Auton Soldier relevance 0.51 · 15.5% (31 of 200 decks)
- Rust Elemental relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (15 of 200 decks)
- Legerdemain relevance 0.50 · 8.0% (16 of 200 decks)
- Steel Golem relevance 0.50 · 7.5% (15 of 200 decks)
- Thunderhawk Gunship relevance 0.49 · 8.0% (16 of 200 decks)
- Eldrazi Confluence relevance 0.49 · 7.5% (15 of 200 decks)
- Thought Eater relevance 0.48 · 7.0% (14 of 200 decks)
- Esperzoa relevance 0.48 · 7.5% (15 of 200 decks)
All creatures (31)
- Ultimecia, Temporal Threat relevance 0.98 · 21.5% (43 of 200 decks)
- Grazilaxx, Illithid Scholar relevance 0.96 · 23.5% (47 of 200 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.89 · 33.5% (67 of 200 decks)
- Spider-Byte, Web Warden relevance 0.81 · 13.0% (26 of 200 decks)
- Jill, Shiva's Dominant // Shiva, Warden of Ice relevance 0.67 · 15.5% (31 of 200 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.63 · 18.5% (37 of 200 decks)
- Broodbirth Viper relevance 0.61 · 10.5% (21 of 200 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.61 · 20.5% (41 of 200 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.59 · 18.5% (37 of 200 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.59 · 16.5% (33 of 200 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.58 · 16.5% (33 of 200 decks)
- Defiler of Dreams relevance 0.55 · 19.5% (39 of 200 decks)
- Identity Thief relevance 0.52 · 9.0% (18 of 200 decks)
- Trusted Advisor relevance 0.52 · 8.0% (16 of 200 decks)
- Auton Soldier relevance 0.51 · 15.5% (31 of 200 decks)
- Rust Elemental relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (15 of 200 decks)
- Steel Golem relevance 0.50 · 7.5% (15 of 200 decks)
- Thought Eater relevance 0.48 · 7.0% (14 of 200 decks)
- Esperzoa relevance 0.48 · 7.5% (15 of 200 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.48 · 14.0% (28 of 200 decks)
- Djinn of Infinite Deceits relevance 0.47 · 7.5% (15 of 200 decks)
- Gogo, Master of Mimicry relevance 0.47 · 12.0% (24 of 200 decks)
- Silent Hallcreeper relevance 0.47 · 15.5% (31 of 200 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.46 · 13.0% (26 of 200 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 0.45 · 7.0% (14 of 200 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.45 · 8.5% (17 of 200 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.44 · 15.0% (30 of 200 decks)
- Professor Hulk relevance 0.43 · 7.5% (15 of 200 decks)
- Canoptek Scarab Swarm relevance 0.43 · 8.5% (17 of 200 decks)
- Howling Golem relevance 0.43 · 7.5% (15 of 200 decks)
- Reed Richards, Smartest Man relevance 0.43 · 8.5% (17 of 200 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.68 · 32.5% (65 of 200 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.54 · 17.5% (35 of 200 decks)
- The Indomitable relevance 0.53 · 13.5% (27 of 200 decks)
- Thunderhawk Gunship relevance 0.49 · 8.0% (16 of 200 decks)
- Fleetfeather Sandals relevance 0.47 · 7.0% (14 of 200 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.43 · 16.0% (32 of 200 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.81 · 20.0% (40 of 200 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.68 · 25.0% (50 of 200 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.61 · 21.0% (42 of 200 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.60 · 16.0% (32 of 200 decks)
- Bottomless Pool // Locker Room relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (17 of 200 decks)
All instants (4)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.82 · 22.5% (45 of 200 decks)
- Eldrazi Confluence relevance 0.49 · 7.5% (15 of 200 decks)
- Revenge of the Drowned relevance 0.47 · 7.0% (14 of 200 decks)
- Access Denied relevance 0.42 · 11.5% (23 of 200 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Legerdemain relevance 0.50 · 8.0% (16 of 200 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.45 · 13.5% (27 of 200 decks)
- Northampton Farm relevance 0.45 · 7.0% (14 of 200 decks)
All lands (1)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.44 · 23.0% (46 of 200 decks)
EDH data for Spider-Man 2099, Miguel O'Hara: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 200 real decks.





















































