Eat to Extinction
Played in 181 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
Most Relevant
All most relevant (30)
- Pile On relevance 1.35 · 28.7% (52 of 181 decks)
- Disinformation Campaign relevance 1.14 · 19.3% (35 of 181 decks)
- Price of Fame relevance 0.96 · 19.3% (35 of 181 decks)
- Fangkeeper's Familiar relevance 0.95 · 24.9% (45 of 181 decks)
- Mission Briefing relevance 0.90 · 14.9% (27 of 181 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.89 · 21.0% (38 of 181 decks)
- Enhanced Surveillance relevance 0.88 · 22.1% (40 of 181 decks)
- Connive // Concoct relevance 0.88 · 13.8% (25 of 181 decks)
- Doom Whisperer relevance 0.79 · 19.9% (36 of 181 decks)
- Discovery // Dispersal relevance 0.76 · 11.6% (21 of 181 decks)
- Spellgyre relevance 0.75 · 12.7% (23 of 181 decks)
- Dream Eater relevance 0.71 · 11.0% (20 of 181 decks)
- Notion Rain relevance 0.69 · 11.0% (20 of 181 decks)
- Fandaniel, Telophoroi Ascian relevance 0.69 · 9.9% (18 of 181 decks)
- Sultai Ascendancy relevance 0.68 · 18.2% (33 of 181 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.66 · 14.9% (27 of 181 decks)
- Dimir Spybug relevance 0.65 · 9.9% (18 of 181 decks)
- Sinister Sabotage relevance 0.64 · 11.0% (20 of 181 decks)
- Charnel Serenade relevance 0.63 · 9.4% (17 of 181 decks)
- Ertai Resurrected relevance 0.63 · 14.9% (27 of 181 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.63 · 23.8% (43 of 181 decks)
- Eye of Duskmantle relevance 0.60 · 11.0% (20 of 181 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.60 · 18.2% (33 of 181 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.59 · 9.9% (18 of 181 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.58 · 21.5% (39 of 181 decks)
- Mirko, Obsessive Theorist relevance 0.57 · 11.0% (20 of 181 decks)
- Broodheart Engine relevance 0.57 · 11.0% (20 of 181 decks)
- Case of the Shifting Visage relevance 0.54 · 8.8% (16 of 181 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.52 · 10.5% (19 of 181 decks)
- Taigam's Scheming relevance 0.50 · 7.7% (14 of 181 decks)
All creatures (20)
- Fangkeeper's Familiar relevance 0.95 · 24.9% (45 of 181 decks)
- Doom Whisperer relevance 0.79 · 19.9% (36 of 181 decks)
- Dream Eater relevance 0.71 · 11.0% (20 of 181 decks)
- Fandaniel, Telophoroi Ascian relevance 0.69 · 9.9% (18 of 181 decks)
- Dimir Spybug relevance 0.65 · 9.9% (18 of 181 decks)
- Ertai Resurrected relevance 0.63 · 14.9% (27 of 181 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.63 · 23.8% (43 of 181 decks)
- Eye of Duskmantle relevance 0.60 · 11.0% (20 of 181 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.60 · 18.2% (33 of 181 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.58 · 21.5% (39 of 181 decks)
- Mirko, Obsessive Theorist relevance 0.57 · 11.0% (20 of 181 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.52 · 10.5% (19 of 181 decks)
- Master of Death relevance 0.50 · 9.4% (17 of 181 decks)
- Lazav, the Multifarious relevance 0.49 · 8.8% (16 of 181 decks)
- Mindwhisker relevance 0.48 · 7.7% (14 of 181 decks)
- Gravebreaker Lamia relevance 0.46 · 12.7% (23 of 181 decks)
- Sheoldred, Whispering One relevance 0.46 · 13.3% (24 of 181 decks)
- Grave Researcher // Reanimate relevance 0.46 · 14.4% (26 of 181 decks)
- Dimir Strandcatcher relevance 0.45 · 7.2% (13 of 181 decks)
- Starving Revenant relevance 0.45 · 7.2% (13 of 181 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Broodheart Engine relevance 0.57 · 11.0% (20 of 181 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Disinformation Campaign relevance 1.14 · 19.3% (35 of 181 decks)
- Enhanced Surveillance relevance 0.88 · 22.1% (40 of 181 decks)
- Sultai Ascendancy relevance 0.68 · 18.2% (33 of 181 decks)
- Case of the Shifting Visage relevance 0.54 · 8.8% (16 of 181 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.46 · 14.4% (26 of 181 decks)
All instants (10)
- Pile On relevance 1.35 · 28.7% (52 of 181 decks)
- Price of Fame relevance 0.96 · 19.3% (35 of 181 decks)
- Mission Briefing relevance 0.90 · 14.9% (27 of 181 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.89 · 21.0% (38 of 181 decks)
- Discovery // Dispersal relevance 0.76 · 11.6% (21 of 181 decks)
- Spellgyre relevance 0.75 · 12.7% (23 of 181 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.66 · 14.9% (27 of 181 decks)
- Sinister Sabotage relevance 0.64 · 11.0% (20 of 181 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.59 · 9.9% (18 of 181 decks)
- Cruel Truths relevance 0.45 · 7.2% (13 of 181 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Connive // Concoct relevance 0.88 · 13.8% (25 of 181 decks)
- Notion Rain relevance 0.69 · 11.0% (20 of 181 decks)
- Charnel Serenade relevance 0.63 · 9.4% (17 of 181 decks)
- Taigam's Scheming relevance 0.50 · 7.7% (14 of 181 decks)
- Diresight relevance 0.45 · 9.4% (17 of 181 decks)
All utility lands (6)
- Kishla Village relevance 0.64 · 19.3% (35 of 181 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.54 · 24.3% (44 of 181 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.49 · 27.6% (50 of 181 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.48 · 24.9% (45 of 181 decks)
- Tocasia's Dig Site relevance 0.45 · 6.6% (12 of 181 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.45 · 9.4% (17 of 181 decks)
All lands (3)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.61 · 11.6% (21 of 181 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.56 · 39.2% (71 of 181 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.53 · 30.9% (56 of 181 decks)
EDH data for Eat to Extinction: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 181 real decks.