Brutalizer Exarch
Played in 235 Temur decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (4)
- Animar, Soul of Elements relevance 2.00 · 1.0% (127 of 12,587 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 1.58 · 1.0% (44 of 4,279 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.59 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.49 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Fierce Empath relevance 1.63 · 46.4% (109 of 235 decks)
- Ancestral Statue relevance 1.36 · 41.3% (97 of 235 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 1.31 · 43.0% (101 of 235 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 1.23 · 38.3% (90 of 235 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 1.23 · 31.5% (74 of 235 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 1.21 · 29.8% (70 of 235 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 1.21 · 34.5% (81 of 235 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 1.18 · 36.2% (85 of 235 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 1.18 · 37.0% (87 of 235 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 1.07 · 28.5% (67 of 235 decks)
- Rattleclaw Mystic relevance 1.00 · 34.9% (82 of 235 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.99 · 25.5% (60 of 235 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.99 · 20.9% (49 of 235 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.97 · 37.4% (88 of 235 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 0.96 · 22.6% (53 of 235 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.96 · 17.4% (41 of 235 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.88 · 26.0% (61 of 235 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.84 · 23.4% (55 of 235 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.82 · 29.8% (70 of 235 decks)
- Den Protector relevance 0.81 · 14.9% (35 of 235 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.81 · 31.9% (75 of 235 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.81 · 35.7% (84 of 235 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.76 · 28.1% (66 of 235 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.75 · 38.7% (91 of 235 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.72 · 20.0% (47 of 235 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 0.71 · 30.2% (71 of 235 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.71 · 17.4% (41 of 235 decks)
- Draining Whelk relevance 0.70 · 11.5% (27 of 235 decks)
- Surrak Dragonclaw relevance 0.70 · 23.8% (56 of 235 decks)
- Palinchron relevance 0.69 · 15.3% (36 of 235 decks)
All creatures (48)
- Fierce Empath relevance 1.63 · 46.4% (109 of 235 decks)
- Ancestral Statue relevance 1.36 · 41.3% (97 of 235 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 1.31 · 43.0% (101 of 235 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 1.23 · 38.3% (90 of 235 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 1.23 · 31.5% (74 of 235 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 1.21 · 29.8% (70 of 235 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 1.21 · 34.5% (81 of 235 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 1.18 · 36.2% (85 of 235 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 1.18 · 37.0% (87 of 235 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 1.07 · 28.5% (67 of 235 decks)
- Rattleclaw Mystic relevance 1.00 · 34.9% (82 of 235 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.99 · 25.5% (60 of 235 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.99 · 20.9% (49 of 235 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.97 · 37.4% (88 of 235 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 0.96 · 22.6% (53 of 235 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.96 · 17.4% (41 of 235 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.88 · 26.0% (61 of 235 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.84 · 23.4% (55 of 235 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.82 · 29.8% (70 of 235 decks)
- Den Protector relevance 0.81 · 14.9% (35 of 235 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.81 · 31.9% (75 of 235 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.81 · 35.7% (84 of 235 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.76 · 28.1% (66 of 235 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.75 · 38.7% (91 of 235 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 0.71 · 30.2% (71 of 235 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.71 · 17.4% (41 of 235 decks)
- Draining Whelk relevance 0.70 · 11.5% (27 of 235 decks)
- Surrak Dragonclaw relevance 0.70 · 23.8% (56 of 235 decks)
- Palinchron relevance 0.69 · 15.3% (36 of 235 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.68 · 14.9% (35 of 235 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.68 · 18.3% (43 of 235 decks)
- Imperial Recruiter relevance 0.67 · 20.0% (47 of 235 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.67 · 23.4% (55 of 235 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.67 · 22.1% (52 of 235 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 0.67 · 13.6% (32 of 235 decks)
- Progenitor Mimic relevance 0.67 · 14.5% (34 of 235 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.66 · 14.0% (33 of 235 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.66 · 23.4% (55 of 235 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.63 · 15.3% (36 of 235 decks)
- Dream Stalker relevance 0.63 · 11.1% (26 of 235 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.63 · 13.6% (32 of 235 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.62 · 17.9% (42 of 235 decks)
- Zealous Conscripts relevance 0.62 · 12.8% (30 of 235 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.61 · 11.5% (27 of 235 decks)
- Shaman of Forgotten Ways relevance 0.61 · 12.3% (29 of 235 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.60 · 17.0% (40 of 235 decks)
- Kiki-Jiki, Mirror Breaker relevance 0.59 · 14.0% (33 of 235 decks)
- Pathbreaker Ibex relevance 0.59 · 14.0% (33 of 235 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.72 · 20.0% (47 of 235 decks)
All lands (1)
- Ancient Ziggurat relevance 0.91 · 21.7% (51 of 235 decks)
EDH data for Brutalizer Exarch: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 235 real decks.