Azure Mage
Played in 256 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (16)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 3.31 · 9.6% (64 of 666 decks)
- Alexi, Zephyr Mage relevance 1.06 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.01 · 3.9% (4 of 103 decks)
- Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.85 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Ambassador Laquatus relevance 0.77 · 2.7% (3 of 113 decks)
- Syr Elenora, the Discerning relevance 0.66 · 1.1% (4 of 353 decks)
- Iymrith, Desert Doom relevance 0.53 · 1.7% (2 of 115 decks)
- Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher relevance 0.50 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 0.50 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.48 · 1.3% (2 of 151 decks)
- Soramaro, First to Dream relevance 0.43 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Renet, Temporal Apprentice relevance 0.42 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Linessa, Zephyr Mage relevance 0.41 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Doc Ock, Sinister Scientist relevance 0.40 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.32 · 1.5% (1 of 68 decks)
- Uyo, Silent Prophet relevance 0.27 · 1.0% (1 of 96 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Turn to Frog relevance 1.47 · 26.2% (67 of 256 decks)
- Sphinx of Magosi relevance 1.42 · 26.2% (67 of 256 decks)
- Distorting Wake relevance 1.39 · 22.3% (57 of 256 decks)
- Riptide Survivor relevance 1.37 · 19.9% (51 of 256 decks)
- Hoverguard Sweepers relevance 1.37 · 19.9% (51 of 256 decks)
- Fool's Demise relevance 1.37 · 21.9% (56 of 256 decks)
- Frost Titan relevance 1.33 · 23.8% (61 of 256 decks)
- Willbender relevance 1.33 · 25.4% (65 of 256 decks)
- Dulcet Sirens relevance 1.33 · 21.9% (56 of 256 decks)
- Stitcher Geralf relevance 1.32 · 23.0% (59 of 256 decks)
- Brine Elemental relevance 1.32 · 23.0% (59 of 256 decks)
- Ur-Golem's Eye relevance 1.31 · 24.2% (62 of 256 decks)
- Unstable Obelisk relevance 1.30 · 23.0% (59 of 256 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.28 · 25.4% (65 of 256 decks)
- Call to Mind relevance 1.27 · 26.6% (68 of 256 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 1.27 · 24.2% (62 of 256 decks)
- Sphinx of Jwar Isle relevance 1.27 · 21.1% (54 of 256 decks)
- Infinite Reflection relevance 1.26 · 21.1% (54 of 256 decks)
- Sea Gate Oracle relevance 1.24 · 27.0% (69 of 256 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 1.21 · 26.6% (68 of 256 decks)
- Breaching Leviathan relevance 1.20 · 24.2% (62 of 256 decks)
- Sphinx of Uthuun relevance 1.19 · 24.6% (63 of 256 decks)
- Fathom Seer relevance 1.18 · 19.9% (51 of 256 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 1.17 · 24.2% (62 of 256 decks)
- Assault Suit relevance 1.17 · 19.5% (50 of 256 decks)
- Well of Ideas relevance 1.17 · 25.0% (64 of 256 decks)
- Domineering Will relevance 1.16 · 24.2% (62 of 256 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 1.15 · 28.9% (74 of 256 decks)
- Intellectual Offering relevance 1.13 · 21.1% (54 of 256 decks)
- Stormsurge Kraken relevance 1.12 · 23.8% (61 of 256 decks)
All creatures (22)
- Sphinx of Magosi relevance 1.42 · 26.2% (67 of 256 decks)
- Riptide Survivor relevance 1.37 · 19.9% (51 of 256 decks)
- Hoverguard Sweepers relevance 1.37 · 19.9% (51 of 256 decks)
- Frost Titan relevance 1.33 · 23.8% (61 of 256 decks)
- Willbender relevance 1.33 · 25.4% (65 of 256 decks)
- Dulcet Sirens relevance 1.33 · 21.9% (56 of 256 decks)
- Stitcher Geralf relevance 1.32 · 23.0% (59 of 256 decks)
- Brine Elemental relevance 1.32 · 23.0% (59 of 256 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.28 · 25.4% (65 of 256 decks)
- Sphinx of Jwar Isle relevance 1.27 · 21.1% (54 of 256 decks)
- Sea Gate Oracle relevance 1.24 · 27.0% (69 of 256 decks)
- Breaching Leviathan relevance 1.20 · 24.2% (62 of 256 decks)
- Sphinx of Uthuun relevance 1.19 · 24.6% (63 of 256 decks)
- Fathom Seer relevance 1.18 · 19.9% (51 of 256 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 1.17 · 24.2% (62 of 256 decks)
- Stormsurge Kraken relevance 1.12 · 23.8% (61 of 256 decks)
- Phyrexian Ingester relevance 1.12 · 22.3% (57 of 256 decks)
- Reef Worm relevance 1.08 · 23.0% (59 of 256 decks)
- Ixidron relevance 1.06 · 22.7% (58 of 256 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 1.02 · 21.9% (56 of 256 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 1.01 · 29.7% (76 of 256 decks)
- Steel Hellkite relevance 0.87 · 22.7% (58 of 256 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Ur-Golem's Eye relevance 1.31 · 24.2% (62 of 256 decks)
- Unstable Obelisk relevance 1.30 · 23.0% (59 of 256 decks)
- Assault Suit relevance 1.17 · 19.5% (50 of 256 decks)
- Dreamstone Hedron relevance 1.09 · 25.0% (64 of 256 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.93 · 24.6% (63 of 256 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.89 · 28.5% (73 of 256 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Fool's Demise relevance 1.37 · 21.9% (56 of 256 decks)
- Infinite Reflection relevance 1.26 · 21.1% (54 of 256 decks)
- Well of Ideas relevance 1.17 · 25.0% (64 of 256 decks)
All instants (8)
- Turn to Frog relevance 1.47 · 26.2% (67 of 256 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 1.21 · 26.6% (68 of 256 decks)
- Domineering Will relevance 1.16 · 24.2% (62 of 256 decks)
- Intellectual Offering relevance 1.13 · 21.1% (54 of 256 decks)
- Exclude relevance 1.05 · 24.2% (62 of 256 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 1.02 · 27.3% (70 of 256 decks)
- Stroke of Genius relevance 0.91 · 23.8% (61 of 256 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.83 · 23.0% (59 of 256 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Distorting Wake relevance 1.39 · 22.3% (57 of 256 decks)
- Call to Mind relevance 1.27 · 26.6% (68 of 256 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 1.27 · 24.2% (62 of 256 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 1.15 · 28.9% (74 of 256 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 1.07 · 23.8% (61 of 256 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.99 · 23.4% (60 of 256 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 1.28 · 23.4% (60 of 256 decks)
- Zoetic Cavern relevance 1.22 · 21.5% (55 of 256 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.93 · 23.4% (60 of 256 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.82 · 26.2% (67 of 256 decks)
All lands (1)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.96 · 26.2% (67 of 256 decks)
EDH data for Azure Mage: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 256 real decks.