Three Dreams
Played in 166 Mardu decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (4)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 3.14 · 12.4% (24 of 194 decks)
- Mathas, Fiend Seeker relevance 2.76 · 2.9% (48 of 1,633 decks)
- Ghen, Arcanum Weaver relevance 1.58 · 1.0% (20 of 1,940 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.37 · 1.2% (1 of 86 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Curse of Misfortunes relevance 4.73 · 76.5% (127 of 166 decks)
- Cruel Reality relevance 4.27 · 68.1% (113 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Death's Hold relevance 4.13 · 63.3% (105 of 166 decks)
- Mesa Enchantress relevance 4.12 · 79.5% (132 of 166 decks)
- Overwhelming Splendor relevance 3.94 · 69.9% (116 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Disturbance relevance 3.54 · 72.9% (121 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Vitality relevance 3.53 · 64.5% (107 of 166 decks)
- Sphere of Safety relevance 3.21 · 71.7% (119 of 166 decks)
- Heliod's Pilgrim relevance 2.89 · 43.4% (72 of 166 decks)
- Torment of Scarabs relevance 2.67 · 41.0% (68 of 166 decks)
- Trespasser's Curse relevance 2.64 · 44.6% (74 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Bloodletting relevance 2.62 · 44.6% (74 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Exhaustion relevance 2.57 · 41.6% (69 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Thirst relevance 2.53 · 37.3% (62 of 166 decks)
- Auramancer relevance 2.47 · 39.8% (66 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Fool's Wisdom relevance 2.36 · 38.0% (63 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 2.32 · 83.7% (139 of 166 decks)
- Stunning Reversal relevance 2.12 · 30.7% (51 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Vengeance relevance 2.09 · 31.3% (52 of 166 decks)
- Starfield Mystic relevance 2.07 · 39.2% (65 of 166 decks)
- Curse of the Nightly Hunt relevance 1.99 · 30.7% (51 of 166 decks)
- Wall of Blood relevance 1.98 · 29.5% (49 of 166 decks)
- Axis of Mortality relevance 1.98 · 30.7% (51 of 166 decks)
- Repay in Kind relevance 1.96 · 28.9% (48 of 166 decks)
- Slaughter Pact relevance 1.95 · 29.5% (49 of 166 decks)
- Sulfuric Vortex relevance 1.94 · 28.9% (48 of 166 decks)
- Havoc Festival relevance 1.93 · 31.9% (53 of 166 decks)
- Lich's Mastery relevance 1.91 · 28.9% (48 of 166 decks)
- Tiana, Ship's Caretaker relevance 1.87 · 29.5% (49 of 166 decks)
- Indestructibility relevance 1.86 · 29.5% (49 of 166 decks)
All creatures (9)
- Mesa Enchantress relevance 4.12 · 79.5% (132 of 166 decks)
- Heliod's Pilgrim relevance 2.89 · 43.4% (72 of 166 decks)
- Auramancer relevance 2.47 · 39.8% (66 of 166 decks)
- Starfield Mystic relevance 2.07 · 39.2% (65 of 166 decks)
- Wall of Blood relevance 1.98 · 29.5% (49 of 166 decks)
- Tiana, Ship's Caretaker relevance 1.87 · 29.5% (49 of 166 decks)
- Erebos, God of the Dead relevance 1.73 · 30.7% (51 of 166 decks)
- Exquisite Archangel relevance 1.72 · 30.7% (51 of 166 decks)
- Crypt Ghast relevance 1.67 · 30.1% (50 of 166 decks)
All enchantments (34)
- Curse of Misfortunes relevance 4.73 · 76.5% (127 of 166 decks)
- Cruel Reality relevance 4.27 · 68.1% (113 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Death's Hold relevance 4.13 · 63.3% (105 of 166 decks)
- Overwhelming Splendor relevance 3.94 · 69.9% (116 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Disturbance relevance 3.54 · 72.9% (121 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Vitality relevance 3.53 · 64.5% (107 of 166 decks)
- Sphere of Safety relevance 3.21 · 71.7% (119 of 166 decks)
- Torment of Scarabs relevance 2.67 · 41.0% (68 of 166 decks)
- Trespasser's Curse relevance 2.64 · 44.6% (74 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Bloodletting relevance 2.62 · 44.6% (74 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Exhaustion relevance 2.57 · 41.6% (69 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Thirst relevance 2.53 · 37.3% (62 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Fool's Wisdom relevance 2.36 · 38.0% (63 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 2.32 · 83.7% (139 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Vengeance relevance 2.09 · 31.3% (52 of 166 decks)
- Curse of the Nightly Hunt relevance 1.99 · 30.7% (51 of 166 decks)
- Axis of Mortality relevance 1.98 · 30.7% (51 of 166 decks)
- Sulfuric Vortex relevance 1.94 · 28.9% (48 of 166 decks)
- Havoc Festival relevance 1.93 · 31.9% (53 of 166 decks)
- Lich's Mastery relevance 1.91 · 28.9% (48 of 166 decks)
- Indestructibility relevance 1.86 · 29.5% (49 of 166 decks)
- Leyline of Sanctity relevance 1.80 · 28.9% (48 of 166 decks)
- Phyrexian Unlife relevance 1.80 · 30.1% (50 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Chaos relevance 1.76 · 25.9% (43 of 166 decks)
- Solemnity relevance 1.73 · 30.7% (51 of 166 decks)
- Captive Audience relevance 1.71 · 33.1% (55 of 166 decks)
- Demonic Pact relevance 1.71 · 30.7% (51 of 166 decks)
- Leyline of the Void relevance 1.70 · 28.9% (48 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Shallow Graves relevance 1.61 · 24.7% (41 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Shaken Faith relevance 1.58 · 24.7% (41 of 166 decks)
- Aura of Silence relevance 1.56 · 29.5% (49 of 166 decks)
- Oblivion Ring relevance 1.55 · 28.3% (47 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Obsession relevance 1.49 · 21.7% (36 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Stalked Prey relevance 1.45 · 21.7% (36 of 166 decks)
All instants (2)
- Stunning Reversal relevance 2.12 · 30.7% (51 of 166 decks)
- Slaughter Pact relevance 1.95 · 29.5% (49 of 166 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Repay in Kind relevance 1.96 · 28.9% (48 of 166 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 1.81 · 43.4% (72 of 166 decks)
- Approach of the Second Sun relevance 1.60 · 28.9% (48 of 166 decks)
- Open the Vaults relevance 1.48 · 25.3% (42 of 166 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 1.63 · 24.1% (40 of 166 decks)
EDH data for Three Dreams: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 166 real decks.