Iron-Craw Crusher
Played in 664 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
48.3% Green
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (13)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 4.72 · 19.1% (467 of 2,445 decks)
- Oviya, Automech Artisan relevance 2.22 · 4.1% (91 of 2,199 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 0.84 · 1.4% (14 of 1,000 decks)
- Runadi, Behemoth Caller relevance 0.63 · 1.1% (9 of 818 decks)
- Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 0.53 · 2.2% (3 of 135 decks)
- Syr Faren, the Hengehammer relevance 0.52 · 3.7% (2 of 54 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.40 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Zuri, Warrior of Wakanda relevance 0.38 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.33 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.32 · 1.3% (2 of 159 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 0.29 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Baru, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.21 · 1.3% (1 of 77 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 2.70 · 65.1% (432 of 664 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 2.43 · 52.3% (347 of 664 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 2.36 · 58.9% (391 of 664 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 2.26 · 55.4% (368 of 664 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 2.25 · 47.6% (316 of 664 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 2.23 · 48.2% (320 of 664 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 2.22 · 51.1% (339 of 664 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 2.22 · 53.3% (354 of 664 decks)
- Sifter Wurm relevance 2.21 · 47.3% (314 of 664 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 2.20 · 47.6% (316 of 664 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 2.19 · 48.0% (319 of 664 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 2.18 · 50.0% (332 of 664 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 2.07 · 42.8% (284 of 664 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 1.98 · 67.8% (450 of 664 decks)
- Elfhame Wurm relevance 1.93 · 37.0% (246 of 664 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 1.92 · 39.0% (259 of 664 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 1.91 · 39.6% (263 of 664 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 1.91 · 60.1% (399 of 664 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 1.89 · 60.8% (404 of 664 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 1.85 · 40.5% (269 of 664 decks)
- Soul Swallower relevance 1.75 · 32.8% (218 of 664 decks)
- Hazard of the Dunes relevance 1.72 · 32.1% (213 of 664 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 1.70 · 61.9% (411 of 664 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 1.66 · 40.2% (267 of 664 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 1.61 · 54.7% (363 of 664 decks)
- Carnage Wurm relevance 1.56 · 28.3% (188 of 664 decks)
- Symbiotic Wurm relevance 1.46 · 28.0% (186 of 664 decks)
- Crush of Wurms relevance 1.46 · 28.9% (192 of 664 decks)
- Witherscale Wurm relevance 1.41 · 24.5% (163 of 664 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 1.32 · 61.7% (410 of 664 decks)
All creatures (44)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 2.70 · 65.1% (432 of 664 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 2.43 · 52.3% (347 of 664 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 2.36 · 58.9% (391 of 664 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 2.26 · 55.4% (368 of 664 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 2.25 · 47.6% (316 of 664 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 2.23 · 48.2% (320 of 664 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 2.22 · 51.1% (339 of 664 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 2.22 · 53.3% (354 of 664 decks)
- Sifter Wurm relevance 2.21 · 47.3% (314 of 664 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 2.20 · 47.6% (316 of 664 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 2.19 · 48.0% (319 of 664 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 2.18 · 50.0% (332 of 664 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 2.07 · 42.8% (284 of 664 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 1.98 · 67.8% (450 of 664 decks)
- Elfhame Wurm relevance 1.93 · 37.0% (246 of 664 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 1.92 · 39.0% (259 of 664 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 1.91 · 39.6% (263 of 664 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 1.91 · 60.1% (399 of 664 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 1.85 · 40.5% (269 of 664 decks)
- Soul Swallower relevance 1.75 · 32.8% (218 of 664 decks)
- Hazard of the Dunes relevance 1.72 · 32.1% (213 of 664 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 1.70 · 61.9% (411 of 664 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 1.66 · 40.2% (267 of 664 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 1.61 · 54.7% (363 of 664 decks)
- Carnage Wurm relevance 1.56 · 28.3% (188 of 664 decks)
- Symbiotic Wurm relevance 1.46 · 28.0% (186 of 664 decks)
- Witherscale Wurm relevance 1.41 · 24.5% (163 of 664 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 1.32 · 61.7% (410 of 664 decks)
- Germinating Wurm relevance 1.28 · 23.0% (153 of 664 decks)
- Ravenous Lindwurm relevance 1.09 · 18.7% (124 of 664 decks)
- Roaring Slagwurm relevance 1.07 · 17.5% (116 of 664 decks)
- Pouncing Wurm relevance 1.02 · 16.1% (107 of 664 decks)
- Gravetiller Wurm relevance 1.01 · 16.4% (109 of 664 decks)
- Deathcoil Wurm relevance 1.00 · 16.9% (112 of 664 decks)
- Siege Wurm relevance 0.99 · 17.0% (113 of 664 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.93 · 35.1% (233 of 664 decks)
- Voracious Wurm relevance 0.93 · 15.2% (101 of 664 decks)
- Cradle Clearcutter relevance 0.90 · 16.7% (111 of 664 decks)
- Phantom Wurm relevance 0.89 · 14.2% (94 of 664 decks)
- Boneyard Wurm relevance 0.88 · 14.6% (97 of 664 decks)
- Rust Goliath relevance 0.83 · 14.6% (97 of 664 decks)
- Vigorspore Wurm relevance 0.82 · 13.0% (86 of 664 decks)
- Teething Wurmlet relevance 0.78 · 17.3% (115 of 664 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.77 · 23.2% (154 of 664 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 1.89 · 60.8% (404 of 664 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.82 · 23.2% (154 of 664 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Crush of Wurms relevance 1.46 · 28.9% (192 of 664 decks)
- Roar of the Wurm relevance 1.23 · 20.9% (139 of 664 decks)
- Wurmcalling relevance 1.13 · 20.6% (137 of 664 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.87 · 34.2% (227 of 664 decks)
EDH data for Iron-Craw Crusher: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 664 real decks.