Rowan Treefolk
Played in 44 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
40.0% Green
- Green 44 · 40.0%
- Selesnya 28 · 25.5%
- Abzan 22 · 20.0%
- Golgari 5 · 4.5%
- Naya 4 · 3.6%
- Simic 3 · 2.7%
- Other (3) 4 · 3.6%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (4)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 2.40 · 1.3% (21 of 1,557 decks)
- Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 2.12 · 1.3% (15 of 1,189 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 1.08 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Verdeloth the Ancient relevance 0.54 · 1.3% (1 of 76 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 2.53 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 2.40 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 2.15 · 45.5% (20 of 44 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 2.07 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 2.05 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 2.04 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 2.04 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 2.02 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 1.97 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 1.94 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Treefolk Seedlings relevance 1.92 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.82 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 1.77 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 1.76 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 1.73 · 34.1% (15 of 44 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 1.71 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 1.70 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 1.70 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Battlewand Oak relevance 1.66 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Reach of Branches relevance 1.62 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 1.61 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Seedguide Ash relevance 1.60 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 1.59 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 1.57 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 1.57 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Orchard Warden relevance 1.54 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Tuinvale Treefolk // Oaken Boon relevance 1.54 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 1.54 · 45.5% (20 of 44 decks)
- Scaled Wurm relevance 1.53 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 1.52 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
All creatures (47)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 2.53 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 2.40 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 2.15 · 45.5% (20 of 44 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 2.07 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 2.05 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 2.04 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 2.04 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 2.02 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 1.97 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 1.94 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Treefolk Seedlings relevance 1.92 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.82 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 1.77 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 1.76 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 1.73 · 34.1% (15 of 44 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 1.71 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 1.70 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Battlewand Oak relevance 1.66 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 1.61 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Seedguide Ash relevance 1.60 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 1.59 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 1.57 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 1.57 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Orchard Warden relevance 1.54 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Tuinvale Treefolk // Oaken Boon relevance 1.54 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 1.54 · 45.5% (20 of 44 decks)
- Scaled Wurm relevance 1.53 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 1.52 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Ghastbark Twins relevance 1.50 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Weatherseed Treefolk relevance 1.50 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Ulvenwald Observer relevance 1.47 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Treefolk Harbinger relevance 1.46 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 1.46 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Ezzaroot Channeler relevance 1.45 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 1.42 · 50.0% (22 of 44 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 1.40 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Elder relevance 1.38 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Harrier Naga relevance 1.37 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 1.35 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Bosk Banneret relevance 1.34 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Unstoppable Ash relevance 1.32 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 1.30 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 1.29 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 1.28 · 34.1% (15 of 44 decks)
- Warden of the Woods relevance 1.27 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 1.24 · 34.1% (15 of 44 decks)
- Ghoultree relevance 1.23 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 1.70 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
All instants (2)
- Reach of Branches relevance 1.62 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Rootgrapple relevance 1.45 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
EDH data for Rowan Treefolk: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 44 real decks.