Ray of Command
Played in 518 Blue decks
3030+24+4+3+10+8+1+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Geralf, Visionary Stitcher 12.3% of decks
Geralf, Visionary Stitcher 12.3% of decks
Thassa, Deep-Dwelling 7.7% of decks
Thassa, Deep-Dwelling 7.7% of decks
Jalira, Master Polymorphist 3.7% of decks
Jalira, Master Polymorphist 3.7% of decks
Empress Galina 4.0% of decks
Empress Galina 4.0% of decks
Kopala, Warden of Waves 10.0% of decks
Kopala, Warden of Waves 10.0% of decks
Kira, Great Glass-Spinner 3.0% of decks
Kira, Great Glass-Spinner 3.0% of decks
Most Relevant
Domineering Will 24.7% of decks
Domineering Will 24.7% of decks
Chamber of Manipulation 16.8% of decks
Chamber of Manipulation 16.8% of decks
Control Magic 23.0% of decks
Control Magic 23.0% of decks
Reins of Power 22.8% of decks
Reins of Power 22.8% of decks
Overtaker 13.1% of decks
Overtaker 13.1% of decks
Mind Flayer 20.5% of decks
Mind Flayer 20.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Geralf, Visionary Stitcher relevance 2.95 · 12.3% (62 of 504 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 2.54 · 7.7% (57 of 741 decks)
- Jalira, Master Polymorphist relevance 1.70 · 3.7% (30 of 810 decks)
- Empress Galina relevance 1.49 · 4.0% (18 of 455 decks)
- Kopala, Warden of Waves relevance 1.31 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Kira, Great Glass-Spinner relevance 0.90 · 3.0% (6 of 198 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 0.85 · 1.6% (10 of 625 decks)
- Maeve, Insidious Singer relevance 0.84 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.83 · 2.1% (7 of 329 decks)
- Barrin, Master Wizard relevance 0.76 · 3.3% (4 of 123 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.62 · 1.9% (4 of 206 decks)
- Evie Frye relevance 0.58 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 0.57 · 1.3% (5 of 397 decks)
- Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 0.53 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Rayne, Academy Chancellor relevance 0.50 · 1.7% (3 of 176 decks)
- Kaho, Minamo Historian relevance 0.49 · 1.2% (4 of 341 decks)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 0.48 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Ertai, Wizard Adept relevance 0.46 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 0.43 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 0.42 · 1.9% (2 of 105 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 0.42 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.41 · 1.1% (3 of 276 decks)
- Ty Lee, Chi Blocker relevance 0.38 · 1.5% (2 of 134 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Faceless One relevance 0.37 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 0.34 · 1.2% (2 of 165 decks)
- Gandalf, Wandering Wizard relevance 0.34 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Naru Meha, Master Wizard relevance 0.33 · 1.1% (2 of 178 decks)
- Gadwick, the Wizened relevance 0.32 · 1.1% (2 of 186 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Hakim, Loreweaver relevance 0.31 · 1.0% (2 of 194 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Domineering Will relevance 1.18 · 24.7% (128 of 518 decks)
- Chamber of Manipulation relevance 0.97 · 16.8% (87 of 518 decks)
- Control Magic relevance 0.95 · 23.0% (119 of 518 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.93 · 22.8% (118 of 518 decks)
- Overtaker relevance 0.89 · 13.1% (68 of 518 decks)
- Mind Flayer relevance 0.89 · 20.5% (106 of 518 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 0.85 · 22.2% (115 of 518 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 0.76 · 19.7% (102 of 518 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 0.74 · 13.1% (68 of 518 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 0.66 · 12.0% (62 of 518 decks)
- Invoke the Winds relevance 0.65 · 16.2% (84 of 518 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 0.65 · 12.5% (65 of 518 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 0.62 · 10.4% (54 of 518 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.61 · 19.1% (99 of 518 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.61 · 17.4% (90 of 518 decks)
- Entrancing Melody relevance 0.60 · 10.8% (56 of 518 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.59 · 13.9% (72 of 518 decks)
- Corrupted Shapeshifter relevance 0.58 · 10.0% (52 of 518 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 0.57 · 13.3% (69 of 518 decks)
- Floodgate relevance 0.57 · 11.2% (58 of 518 decks)
- Master Thief relevance 0.56 · 8.9% (46 of 518 decks)
- Lullmage's Domination relevance 0.54 · 8.7% (45 of 518 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.54 · 31.7% (164 of 518 decks)
- Glacial Wall relevance 0.53 · 8.9% (46 of 518 decks)
- Tempted by the Oriq relevance 0.53 · 11.4% (59 of 518 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 0.52 · 10.0% (52 of 518 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 0.51 · 9.8% (51 of 518 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.50 · 17.8% (92 of 518 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.50 · 13.1% (68 of 518 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 0.50 · 12.4% (64 of 518 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Overtaker relevance 0.89 · 13.1% (68 of 518 decks)
- Mind Flayer relevance 0.89 · 20.5% (106 of 518 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 0.76 · 19.7% (102 of 518 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 0.74 · 13.1% (68 of 518 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 0.66 · 12.0% (62 of 518 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 0.65 · 12.5% (65 of 518 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 0.62 · 10.4% (54 of 518 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.61 · 19.1% (99 of 518 decks)
- Corrupted Shapeshifter relevance 0.58 · 10.0% (52 of 518 decks)
- Floodgate relevance 0.57 · 11.2% (58 of 518 decks)
- Master Thief relevance 0.56 · 8.9% (46 of 518 decks)
- Glacial Wall relevance 0.53 · 8.9% (46 of 518 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 0.52 · 10.0% (52 of 518 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 0.51 · 9.8% (51 of 518 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.50 · 17.8% (92 of 518 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 0.50 · 12.4% (64 of 518 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.47 · 18.3% (95 of 518 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.46 · 19.3% (100 of 518 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 0.46 · 8.3% (43 of 518 decks)
- Cleaver Skaab relevance 0.45 · 8.1% (42 of 518 decks)
- Crenellated Wall relevance 0.43 · 6.6% (34 of 518 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.42 · 20.5% (106 of 518 decks)
- Keiga, the Tide Star relevance 0.42 · 8.5% (44 of 518 decks)
- Riptide Turtle relevance 0.41 · 6.9% (36 of 518 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 0.85 · 22.2% (115 of 518 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.54 · 31.7% (164 of 518 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.45 · 22.8% (118 of 518 decks)
- Slagwurm Armor relevance 0.44 · 7.3% (38 of 518 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Chamber of Manipulation relevance 0.97 · 16.8% (87 of 518 decks)
- Control Magic relevance 0.95 · 23.0% (119 of 518 decks)
- Treachery relevance 0.42 · 9.7% (50 of 518 decks)
All instants (10)
- Domineering Will relevance 1.18 · 24.7% (128 of 518 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.93 · 22.8% (118 of 518 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.59 · 13.9% (72 of 518 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 0.48 · 13.3% (69 of 518 decks)
- Fumble relevance 0.45 · 8.7% (45 of 518 decks)
- Desertion relevance 0.44 · 10.8% (56 of 518 decks)
- Reality Ripple relevance 0.42 · 8.3% (43 of 518 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.41 · 14.1% (73 of 518 decks)
- Chilling Trap relevance 0.41 · 8.1% (42 of 518 decks)
- Mizzium Skin relevance 0.39 · 9.8% (51 of 518 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Invoke the Winds relevance 0.65 · 16.2% (84 of 518 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.61 · 17.4% (90 of 518 decks)
- Entrancing Melody relevance 0.60 · 10.8% (56 of 518 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 0.57 · 13.3% (69 of 518 decks)
- Lullmage's Domination relevance 0.54 · 8.7% (45 of 518 decks)
- Tempted by the Oriq relevance 0.53 · 11.4% (59 of 518 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.50 · 13.1% (68 of 518 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 0.42 · 11.0% (57 of 518 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.47 · 18.3% (95 of 518 decks)
EDH data for Ray of Command: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 518 real decks.

































































