Petting Zookeeper
Played in 64 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
2.9% Sultai
- Golgari 1,436 · 65.2%
- Five-Color 190 · 8.6%
- Gruul 166 · 7.5%
- Simic 158 · 7.2%
- Sultai 64 · 2.9%
- Other (14) 187 · 8.5%
Commanders
1
Commanders
1Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
All commanders (1)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.55 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30Showing 1-10 of 30
Page size
All most relevant (30)
- Thought Monitor relevance 2.73 · 42.2% (27 of 64 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 2.12 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 1.99 · 50.0% (32 of 64 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 1.98 · 65.6% (42 of 64 decks)
- Saw in Half relevance 1.72 · 48.4% (31 of 64 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 1.70 · 48.4% (31 of 64 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 1.64 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 1.52 · 42.2% (27 of 64 decks)
- Blur relevance 1.44 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 1.41 · 48.4% (31 of 64 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 1.40 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Displace relevance 1.33 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Battle at the Bridge relevance 1.33 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 1.30 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 1.21 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 1.05 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 1.03 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.96 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.93 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.93 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.91 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.90 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Baleful Strix relevance 0.87 · 39.1% (25 of 64 decks)
- Ravenous Chupacabra relevance 0.84 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.76 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.76 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.69 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.66 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Whirler Rogue relevance 0.65 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.63 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
Creatures
20
Creatures
20 Showing 1-10 of 20
Page size
All creatures (20)
- Thought Monitor relevance 2.73 · 42.2% (27 of 64 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 2.12 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 1.64 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 1.52 · 42.2% (27 of 64 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 1.41 · 48.4% (31 of 64 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 1.30 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.96 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.93 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.90 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Baleful Strix relevance 0.87 · 39.1% (25 of 64 decks)
- Ravenous Chupacabra relevance 0.84 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.76 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.76 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.69 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Whirler Rogue relevance 0.65 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.60 · 39.1% (25 of 64 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.60 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.56 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.50 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.49 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
Artifacts
8
Artifacts
8 Showing 1-8 of 8
Page size
All artifacts (8)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 1.99 · 50.0% (32 of 64 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 1.98 · 65.6% (42 of 64 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 1.21 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.93 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.66 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.54 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.52 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.50 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
Enchantments
3
Enchantments
3 Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All enchantments (3)
- Mechanized Production relevance 1.05 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 1.03 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.63 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
Instants
7
Instants
7 Showing 1-7 of 7
Page size
All instants (7)
- Saw in Half relevance 1.72 · 48.4% (31 of 64 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 1.70 · 48.4% (31 of 64 decks)
- Blur relevance 1.44 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 1.40 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Displace relevance 1.33 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.91 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.53 · 37.5% (24 of 64 decks)
Sorceries
1
Sorceries
1 Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
All sorceries (1)
- Battle at the Bridge relevance 1.33 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
Utility Lands
5
Utility Lands
5 Showing 1-5 of 5
Page size
All utility lands (5)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 1.32 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.79 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.77 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.57 · 40.6% (26 of 64 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.46 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
Lands
6
Lands
6 Showing 1-6 of 6
Page size
All lands (6)
- Vault of Whispers relevance 1.60 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 1.53 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 1.43 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.79 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Mistvault Bridge relevance 0.76 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Darkmoss Bridge relevance 0.62 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
EDH data for Petting Zookeeper: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 64 real decks.