Second Chance
Played in 140 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
13.4% Azorius
630+9+8+19+1+10+1+1+1+
- Rebbec, Architect of Ascension // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer
0.38| 1.4%
$0.29 · €0.20$0.21 · €0.06
That's every commander.
All commanders (6)
- Hanna, Ship's Navigator relevance 2.84 · 8.0% (25 of 312 decks)
- Tameshi, Reality Architect relevance 2.41 · 2.4% (41 of 1,733 decks)
- Medomai the Ageless relevance 1.22 · 2.1% (6 of 284 decks)
- Ayesha Tanaka relevance 0.63 · 1.6% (2 of 125 decks)
- Rebbec, Architect of Ascension // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 0.38 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
- Sokka, Lateral Strategist relevance 0.37 · 1.3% (1 of 79 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Seal of Cleansing relevance 1.98 · 43.6% (61 of 140 decks)
- Seal of Removal relevance 1.71 · 36.4% (51 of 140 decks)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 1.51 · 32.9% (46 of 140 decks)
- Patron of the Moon relevance 1.37 · 27.1% (38 of 140 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 1.26 · 30.7% (43 of 140 decks)
- Aether Spellbomb relevance 1.20 · 29.3% (41 of 140 decks)
- Angelic Renewal relevance 1.16 · 20.7% (29 of 140 decks)
- Magistrate's Scepter relevance 1.16 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 1.09 · 27.1% (38 of 140 decks)
- Energy Field relevance 1.09 · 20.0% (28 of 140 decks)
- Solitary Confinement relevance 1.08 · 27.9% (39 of 140 decks)
- Standstill relevance 1.07 · 23.6% (33 of 140 decks)
- Soratami Savant relevance 1.04 · 16.4% (23 of 140 decks)
- Artificer's Intuition relevance 1.01 · 20.0% (28 of 140 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.01 · 20.0% (28 of 140 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 1.01 · 22.9% (32 of 140 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 1.00 · 18.6% (26 of 140 decks)
- Parallax Wave relevance 1.00 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Opalescence relevance 1.00 · 15.0% (21 of 140 decks)
- Mu Yanling relevance 1.00 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Sage of Hours relevance 0.99 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.99 · 25.7% (36 of 140 decks)
- Treachery relevance 0.97 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Lighthouse Chronologist relevance 0.96 · 15.0% (21 of 140 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.96 · 28.6% (40 of 140 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.95 · 21.4% (30 of 140 decks)
- Aura of Silence relevance 0.95 · 30.7% (43 of 140 decks)
- Savor the Moment relevance 0.94 · 16.4% (23 of 140 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.93 · 23.6% (33 of 140 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.92 · 22.9% (32 of 140 decks)
All creatures (9)
- Patron of the Moon relevance 1.37 · 27.1% (38 of 140 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 1.26 · 30.7% (43 of 140 decks)
- Soratami Savant relevance 1.04 · 16.4% (23 of 140 decks)
- Sage of Hours relevance 0.99 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.99 · 25.7% (36 of 140 decks)
- Lighthouse Chronologist relevance 0.96 · 15.0% (21 of 140 decks)
- Alseid of Life's Bounty relevance 0.90 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Timestream Navigator relevance 0.88 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Wonderscape Sage relevance 0.87 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
All artifacts (8)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 1.51 · 32.9% (46 of 140 decks)
- Aether Spellbomb relevance 1.20 · 29.3% (41 of 140 decks)
- Magistrate's Scepter relevance 1.16 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 1.01 · 22.9% (32 of 140 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.91 · 22.9% (32 of 140 decks)
- Surveyor's Scope relevance 0.91 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.91 · 20.7% (29 of 140 decks)
- Ugin's Nexus relevance 0.87 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
All enchantments (19)
- Seal of Cleansing relevance 1.98 · 43.6% (61 of 140 decks)
- Seal of Removal relevance 1.71 · 36.4% (51 of 140 decks)
- Angelic Renewal relevance 1.16 · 20.7% (29 of 140 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 1.09 · 27.1% (38 of 140 decks)
- Energy Field relevance 1.09 · 20.0% (28 of 140 decks)
- Solitary Confinement relevance 1.08 · 27.9% (39 of 140 decks)
- Standstill relevance 1.07 · 23.6% (33 of 140 decks)
- Artificer's Intuition relevance 1.01 · 20.0% (28 of 140 decks)
- Parallax Wave relevance 1.00 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Opalescence relevance 1.00 · 15.0% (21 of 140 decks)
- Treachery relevance 0.97 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.96 · 28.6% (40 of 140 decks)
- Aura of Silence relevance 0.95 · 30.7% (43 of 140 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.92 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Stasis relevance 0.91 · 22.1% (31 of 140 decks)
- Parallax Tide relevance 0.91 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Hesitation relevance 0.88 · 12.9% (18 of 140 decks)
- Planar Collapse relevance 0.87 · 12.9% (18 of 140 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.87 · 20.7% (29 of 140 decks)
All instants (1)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.92 · 23.6% (33 of 140 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.01 · 20.0% (28 of 140 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 1.00 · 18.6% (26 of 140 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.95 · 21.4% (30 of 140 decks)
- Savor the Moment relevance 0.94 · 16.4% (23 of 140 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.93 · 23.6% (33 of 140 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.92 · 22.9% (32 of 140 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.89 · 17.1% (24 of 140 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.88 · 17.1% (24 of 140 decks)
- Replenish relevance 0.87 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Rise of the Eldrazi relevance 0.87 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Mu Yanling relevance 1.00 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Ghost Town relevance 0.88 · 15.0% (21 of 140 decks)
All lands (1)
- Serra's Sanctum relevance 1.14 · 24.3% (34 of 140 decks)
EDH data for Second Chance: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 140 real decks.

























































