Color Identity Spread
12.6% Simic
- Sultai 1,772 · 77.3%
- Simic 288 · 12.6%
- Bant 93 · 4.1%
- Five-Color 68 · 3.0%
- Other (9) 70 · 3.1%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (13)
- Momir Vig, Simic Visionary relevance 2.70 · 4.7% (51 of 1,094 decks)
- Lonis, Genetics Expert relevance 1.56 · 2.4% (15 of 618 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 1.25 · 1.6% (12 of 764 decks)
- Zegana, Utopian Speaker relevance 0.89 · 3.7% (3 of 81 decks)
- Rikala, Homarid King relevance 0.86 · 1.5% (5 of 329 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Master Chef relevance 0.81 · 1.0% (6 of 573 decks)
- Roalesk, Apex Hybrid relevance 0.64 · 1.4% (3 of 217 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.59 · 2.1% (2 of 94 decks)
- Master Chef // Alora, Merry Thief relevance 0.50 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.40 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Shameless Charlatan // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.33 · 1.4% (1 of 69 decks)
- Guru Pathik relevance 0.29 · 1.1% (1 of 92 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.29 · 1.0% (1 of 99 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 1.24 · 31.9% (92 of 288 decks)
- Sharktocrab relevance 0.98 · 20.1% (58 of 288 decks)
- Shambleshark relevance 0.91 · 14.2% (41 of 288 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.83 · 21.9% (63 of 288 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.82 · 26.7% (77 of 288 decks)
- Gyre Engineer relevance 0.78 · 19.8% (57 of 288 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.77 · 18.1% (52 of 288 decks)
- Unruly Krasis relevance 0.75 · 12.2% (35 of 288 decks)
- Lonis, Genetics Expert relevance 0.75 · 15.3% (44 of 288 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.70 · 29.5% (85 of 288 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.69 · 24.7% (71 of 288 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.68 · 26.0% (75 of 288 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.65 · 22.9% (66 of 288 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.60 · 18.8% (54 of 288 decks)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 0.59 · 17.7% (51 of 288 decks)
- Incubation // Incongruity relevance 0.58 · 13.5% (39 of 288 decks)
- Experiment Kraj relevance 0.58 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.57 · 21.5% (62 of 288 decks)
- Simic Keyrune relevance 0.57 · 10.1% (29 of 288 decks)
- Simic Guildmage relevance 0.57 · 9.4% (27 of 288 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.56 · 17.0% (49 of 288 decks)
- Elusive Krasis relevance 0.55 · 11.1% (32 of 288 decks)
- Lonis, Cryptozoologist relevance 0.55 · 12.5% (36 of 288 decks)
- Combine Guildmage relevance 0.55 · 10.4% (30 of 288 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.55 · 27.4% (79 of 288 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.54 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Scuttlegator relevance 0.50 · 7.6% (22 of 288 decks)
- Roalesk, Apex Hybrid relevance 0.50 · 10.4% (30 of 288 decks)
- Renegade Krasis relevance 0.49 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.49 · 12.8% (37 of 288 decks)
All creatures (37)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 1.24 · 31.9% (92 of 288 decks)
- Sharktocrab relevance 0.98 · 20.1% (58 of 288 decks)
- Shambleshark relevance 0.91 · 14.2% (41 of 288 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.83 · 21.9% (63 of 288 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.82 · 26.7% (77 of 288 decks)
- Gyre Engineer relevance 0.78 · 19.8% (57 of 288 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.77 · 18.1% (52 of 288 decks)
- Unruly Krasis relevance 0.75 · 12.2% (35 of 288 decks)
- Lonis, Genetics Expert relevance 0.75 · 15.3% (44 of 288 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.70 · 29.5% (85 of 288 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.69 · 24.7% (71 of 288 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.68 · 26.0% (75 of 288 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.65 · 22.9% (66 of 288 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.60 · 18.8% (54 of 288 decks)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 0.59 · 17.7% (51 of 288 decks)
- Experiment Kraj relevance 0.58 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Simic Guildmage relevance 0.57 · 9.4% (27 of 288 decks)
- Elusive Krasis relevance 0.55 · 11.1% (32 of 288 decks)
- Lonis, Cryptozoologist relevance 0.55 · 12.5% (36 of 288 decks)
- Combine Guildmage relevance 0.55 · 10.4% (30 of 288 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.55 · 27.4% (79 of 288 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.54 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Scuttlegator relevance 0.50 · 7.6% (22 of 288 decks)
- Roalesk, Apex Hybrid relevance 0.50 · 10.4% (30 of 288 decks)
- Renegade Krasis relevance 0.49 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Saiba Cryptomancer relevance 0.48 · 7.6% (22 of 288 decks)
- Bounding Krasis relevance 0.48 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 0.47 · 15.3% (44 of 288 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.47 · 17.7% (51 of 288 decks)
- Malanthrope relevance 0.47 · 8.0% (23 of 288 decks)
- Plaxmanta relevance 0.46 · 8.3% (24 of 288 decks)
- Experiment One relevance 0.46 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Simic Manipulator relevance 0.46 · 9.7% (28 of 288 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.46 · 11.1% (32 of 288 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.45 · 19.4% (56 of 288 decks)
- Fear of Impostors relevance 0.45 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Pond Prophet relevance 0.45 · 13.5% (39 of 288 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Simic Keyrune relevance 0.57 · 10.1% (29 of 288 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.47 · 15.3% (44 of 288 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.45 · 22.2% (64 of 288 decks)
All instants (7)
- Incubation // Incongruity relevance 0.58 · 13.5% (39 of 288 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.57 · 21.5% (62 of 288 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.56 · 17.0% (49 of 288 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.49 · 12.8% (37 of 288 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.48 · 16.7% (48 of 288 decks)
- Repudiate // Replicate relevance 0.46 · 11.1% (32 of 288 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.44 · 10.4% (30 of 288 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.52 · 14.6% (42 of 288 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.45 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
All lands (1)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.46 · 17.7% (51 of 288 decks)
EDH data for Scuttling Sentinel: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 288 real decks.