Cards like Kami of Whispered Hopes
10× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
56% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Kami of Whispered Hopes 62%
- Gyre Sage 56%
- Incubation Druid 52%
Cards like Evolution Witness
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Piper Wright, Publick Reporter
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Extruder
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards like Fathom Mage
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Fathom Mage 59%
- Benthic Biomancer 20%
- Pensive Professor 19%
Cards like Neoform
16× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Neoform 27%
- Eldritch Evolution 24%
Cards like Hardened Scales
2.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other Simic decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Simic decks
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Simic decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 48%
- Elvish Mystic 37%
- Fyndhorn Elves 22%
- Orochi Merge-Keeper 1%
Other options: Boreal Druid, Gyre Engineer, Orochi Sustainer, Fyndhorn Elder, Druid of the Cowl, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener
Cards like Rapid Hybridization
2.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.49 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rapid Hybridization 44%
- Pongify 32%
Cards like Wizard Class
8.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 77% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.94 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 82%
- Basalt Monolith 12%
- Mana Vault 11%
- Grim Monolith 1%
Cards like Mutagen Man, Living Ooze
7.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Michelangelo, Mutant BFF, Crustacean Commando, Genghis Frog, Slithering Cryptid
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 21%
- Mystic Remora 21%
Cards like Zimone, Paradox Sculptor
5.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Force of Will
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Force of Will 16%
- Force of Negation 13%
Cards like Duskshell Crawler
4.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Gnarlid Colony, Tuskguard Captain, Drix Fatemaker, Trollbred Guardian, Crowned Ceratok, Baloth Pup
Cards like Chord of Calling
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Collective Resistance
10× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Walking Ballista
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Lyla, Holographic Assistant
3.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Clinquant Skymage, Oneirophage, Ravenhill Flock
Cards like Reshape
4.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Reshape 22%
- Transmute Artifact 6%
Cards like Krark-Clan Ironworks
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Tarrian's Soulcleaver
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Extruder relevance 0.94 · 62.1% (379 of 610 decks)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 0.76 · 76.2% (465 of 610 decks)
- Clan Crafter relevance 0.89 · 57.0% (348 of 610 decks)
- Cryptic Trilobite relevance 0.86 · 55.4% (338 of 610 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.67 · 72.1% (440 of 610 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.79 · 53.8% (328 of 610 decks)
- Grinding Station relevance 0.87 · 35.9% (219 of 610 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.56 · 75.9% (463 of 610 decks)
- Arcbound Ravager relevance 0.82 · 37.5% (229 of 610 decks)
- Tarrian's Soulcleaver relevance 0.59 · 67.4% (411 of 610 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest relevance 0.55 · 69.0% (421 of 610 decks)
- Basking Broodscale relevance 0.68 · 46.7% (285 of 610 decks)
- Lonis, Cryptozoologist relevance 0.65 · 46.6% (284 of 610 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.70 · 25.6% (156 of 610 decks)
- Tangletrove Kelp relevance 0.64 · 32.6% (199 of 610 decks)
- Senator Peacock relevance 0.75 · 17.0% (104 of 610 decks)
- Five Hundred Year Diary relevance 0.68 · 25.9% (158 of 610 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.50 · 53.6% (327 of 610 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.60 · 36.1% (220 of 610 decks)
- Throne of Geth relevance 0.74 · 15.2% (93 of 610 decks)
- Martha Jones relevance 0.72 · 16.6% (101 of 610 decks)
- Donatello, the Brains relevance 0.67 · 22.6% (138 of 610 decks)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 0.59 · 33.3% (203 of 610 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.65 · 22.3% (136 of 610 decks)
- Sage of Hours relevance 0.59 · 31.8% (194 of 610 decks)
- Maester Seymour relevance 0.63 · 23.9% (146 of 610 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.43 · 59.0% (360 of 610 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.67 · 14.6% (89 of 610 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.43 · 56.4% (344 of 610 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.56 · 29.2% (178 of 610 decks)
- Mutagen Man, Living Ooze relevance 0.53 · 33.0% (201 of 610 decks)
- Sarinth Steelseeker relevance 0.60 · 21.3% (130 of 610 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.50 · 36.2% (221 of 610 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.49 · 39.0% (238 of 610 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.58 · 22.3% (136 of 610 decks)
- Ulvenwald Mysteries relevance 0.61 · 17.2% (105 of 610 decks)
- Scurry Oak relevance 0.61 · 17.2% (105 of 610 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.44 · 45.1% (275 of 610 decks)
- Erdwal Illuminator relevance 0.56 · 20.8% (127 of 610 decks)
- Confront the Unknown relevance 0.63 · 12.6% (77 of 610 decks)
- Vigean Graftmage relevance 0.59 · 14.8% (90 of 610 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.55 · 20.8% (127 of 610 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.39 · 51.6% (315 of 610 decks)
- Peregrin Took relevance 0.51 · 25.9% (158 of 610 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.48 · 29.8% (182 of 610 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.51 · 22.1% (135 of 610 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.40 · 44.1% (269 of 610 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.52 · 19.2% (117 of 610 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.47 · 27.0% (165 of 610 decks)
- Nyssa of Traken relevance 0.65 · 6.1% (37 of 610 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Extruder relevance 0.94 · 62.1% (379 of 610 decks)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 0.76 · 76.2% (465 of 610 decks)
- Cryptic Trilobite relevance 0.86 · 55.4% (338 of 610 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.67 · 72.1% (440 of 610 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.56 · 75.9% (463 of 610 decks)
- Arcbound Ravager relevance 0.82 · 37.5% (229 of 610 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest relevance 0.55 · 69.0% (421 of 610 decks)
- Basking Broodscale relevance 0.68 · 46.7% (285 of 610 decks)
- Lonis, Cryptozoologist relevance 0.65 · 46.6% (284 of 610 decks)
- Tangletrove Kelp relevance 0.64 · 32.6% (199 of 610 decks)
- Senator Peacock relevance 0.75 · 17.0% (104 of 610 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.50 · 53.6% (327 of 610 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.60 · 36.1% (220 of 610 decks)
- Martha Jones relevance 0.72 · 16.6% (101 of 610 decks)
- Donatello, the Brains relevance 0.67 · 22.6% (138 of 610 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.65 · 22.3% (136 of 610 decks)
- Sage of Hours relevance 0.59 · 31.8% (194 of 610 decks)
- Maester Seymour relevance 0.63 · 23.9% (146 of 610 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.43 · 59.0% (360 of 610 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.67 · 14.6% (89 of 610 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.43 · 56.4% (344 of 610 decks)
- Mutagen Man, Living Ooze relevance 0.53 · 33.0% (201 of 610 decks)
- Sarinth Steelseeker relevance 0.60 · 21.3% (130 of 610 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.50 · 36.2% (221 of 610 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.49 · 39.0% (238 of 610 decks)
- Scurry Oak relevance 0.61 · 17.2% (105 of 610 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.44 · 45.1% (275 of 610 decks)
- Erdwal Illuminator relevance 0.56 · 20.8% (127 of 610 decks)
- Vigean Graftmage relevance 0.59 · 14.8% (90 of 610 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.39 · 51.6% (315 of 610 decks)
- Peregrin Took relevance 0.51 · 25.9% (158 of 610 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.51 · 22.1% (135 of 610 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.40 · 44.1% (269 of 610 decks)
- Nyssa of Traken relevance 0.65 · 6.1% (37 of 610 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.33 · 62.3% (380 of 610 decks)
- Irma, Part-Time Mutant relevance 0.51 · 17.7% (108 of 610 decks)
- Displaced Dinosaurs relevance 0.56 · 10.8% (66 of 610 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.50 · 15.1% (92 of 610 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.48 · 16.7% (102 of 610 decks)
- Kellan, Inquisitive Prodigy // Tail the Suspect relevance 0.49 · 14.8% (90 of 610 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.42 · 27.0% (165 of 610 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.45 · 19.0% (116 of 610 decks)
- Ornery Tumblewagg relevance 0.52 · 10.3% (63 of 610 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.37 · 37.2% (227 of 610 decks)
- Danny Pink relevance 0.47 · 13.4% (82 of 610 decks)
- Graf Mole relevance 0.55 · 6.9% (42 of 610 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.40 · 25.9% (158 of 610 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.42 · 21.3% (130 of 610 decks)
- Pensive Professor relevance 0.43 · 18.9% (115 of 610 decks)
- Stridehangar Automaton relevance 0.50 · 7.2% (44 of 610 decks)
All artifacts (40)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.79 · 53.8% (328 of 610 decks)
- Grinding Station relevance 0.87 · 35.9% (219 of 610 decks)
- Tarrian's Soulcleaver relevance 0.59 · 67.4% (411 of 610 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.70 · 25.6% (156 of 610 decks)
- Five Hundred Year Diary relevance 0.68 · 25.9% (158 of 610 decks)
- Throne of Geth relevance 0.74 · 15.2% (93 of 610 decks)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 0.59 · 33.3% (203 of 610 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.56 · 29.2% (178 of 610 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.52 · 19.2% (117 of 610 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.48 · 17.7% (108 of 610 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.31 · 47.4% (289 of 610 decks)
- Arcade Cabinet relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (46 of 610 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.49 · 7.2% (44 of 610 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.49 · 5.9% (36 of 610 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.43 · 9.0% (55 of 610 decks)
- Transmutation Font relevance 0.48 · 4.3% (26 of 610 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.32 · 17.5% (107 of 610 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.34 · 12.0% (73 of 610 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.23 · 40.7% (248 of 610 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.36 · 7.4% (45 of 610 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.31 · 13.3% (81 of 610 decks)
- Radiant Lotus relevance 0.52 · 2.8% (17 of 610 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.30 · 12.1% (74 of 610 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.30 · 10.8% (66 of 610 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.30 · 10.7% (65 of 610 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.31 · 10.0% (61 of 610 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.30 · 9.8% (60 of 610 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.27 · 13.4% (82 of 610 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.30 · 7.9% (48 of 610 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.29 · 8.9% (54 of 610 decks)
- Magnifying Glass relevance 0.47 · 2.5% (15 of 610 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.31 · 4.1% (25 of 610 decks)
- Nuka-Cola Vending Machine relevance 0.37 · 3.0% (18 of 610 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.25 · 7.4% (45 of 610 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.21 · 13.8% (84 of 610 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.18 · 20.3% (124 of 610 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.18 · 15.9% (97 of 610 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.17 · 7.0% (43 of 610 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 66.9% (408 of 610 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 82.1% (501 of 610 decks)
All enchantments (43)
- Clan Crafter relevance 0.89 · 57.0% (348 of 610 decks)
- Ulvenwald Mysteries relevance 0.61 · 17.2% (105 of 610 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.48 · 23.0% (140 of 610 decks)
- Fleeting Memories relevance 0.62 · 7.0% (43 of 610 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.48 · 22.1% (135 of 610 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.47 · 14.9% (91 of 610 decks)
- Ongoing Investigation relevance 0.54 · 8.9% (54 of 610 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.41 · 26.7% (163 of 610 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.25 · 71.3% (435 of 610 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.35 · 29.5% (180 of 610 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.37 · 22.5% (137 of 610 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.29 · 38.5% (235 of 610 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.42 · 8.7% (53 of 610 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.32 · 23.3% (142 of 610 decks)
- On the Trail relevance 0.44 · 5.4% (33 of 610 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.42 · 7.0% (43 of 610 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.40 · 8.7% (53 of 610 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.27 · 29.8% (182 of 610 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.28 · 20.2% (123 of 610 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.32 · 8.4% (51 of 610 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.30 · 9.8% (60 of 610 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.25 · 20.8% (127 of 610 decks)
- Evolutionary Escalation relevance 0.48 · 2.5% (15 of 610 decks)
- Curious Inquiry relevance 0.45 · 2.8% (17 of 610 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.27 · 10.2% (62 of 610 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.29 · 5.7% (35 of 610 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.22 · 20.8% (127 of 610 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (19 of 610 decks)
- Trail of Evidence relevance 0.42 · 2.5% (15 of 610 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.26 · 4.9% (30 of 610 decks)
- High Score relevance 0.34 · 3.3% (20 of 610 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.30 · 3.9% (24 of 610 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.32 · 2.6% (16 of 610 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (15 of 610 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.30 · 2.5% (15 of 610 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (18 of 610 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.25 · 3.3% (20 of 610 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.26 · 2.8% (17 of 610 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (16 of 610 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (16 of 610 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (17 of 610 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (15 of 610 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (15 of 610 decks)
All instants (50)
- Confront the Unknown relevance 0.63 · 12.6% (77 of 610 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.48 · 29.8% (182 of 610 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.51 · 16.2% (99 of 610 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.45 · 26.9% (164 of 610 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.49 · 13.9% (85 of 610 decks)
- Invigorating Surge relevance 0.50 · 9.2% (56 of 610 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.41 · 19.0% (116 of 610 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.40 · 15.1% (92 of 610 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.35 · 26.6% (162 of 610 decks)
- Deduce relevance 0.47 · 7.5% (46 of 610 decks)
- Rampage of the Clans relevance 0.49 · 5.1% (31 of 610 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.36 · 23.8% (145 of 610 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.36 · 15.4% (94 of 610 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 0.49 · 4.1% (25 of 610 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.41 · 7.0% (43 of 610 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 0.32 · 18.2% (111 of 610 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.35 · 12.1% (74 of 610 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.27 · 30.3% (185 of 610 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.37 · 8.2% (50 of 610 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.30 · 17.0% (104 of 610 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.32 · 13.6% (83 of 610 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.22 · 46.7% (285 of 610 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.31 · 12.8% (78 of 610 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.28 · 20.2% (123 of 610 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.32 · 10.2% (62 of 610 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.28 · 16.1% (98 of 610 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.32 · 10.2% (62 of 610 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.32 · 8.9% (54 of 610 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.30 · 11.6% (71 of 610 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.29 · 12.8% (78 of 610 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.25 · 20.3% (124 of 610 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.24 · 23.6% (144 of 610 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.39 · 3.9% (24 of 610 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.30 · 7.4% (45 of 610 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.32 · 5.1% (31 of 610 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.19 · 43.6% (266 of 610 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.22 · 26.9% (164 of 610 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.21 · 32.1% (196 of 610 decks)
- Solidarity of Heroes relevance 0.41 · 3.1% (19 of 610 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.22 · 26.7% (163 of 610 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.30 · 5.6% (34 of 610 decks)
- Intuition relevance 0.42 · 3.0% (18 of 610 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.30 · 5.4% (33 of 610 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.30 · 5.1% (31 of 610 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.27 · 8.9% (54 of 610 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.27 · 7.4% (45 of 610 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.35 · 3.6% (22 of 610 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (19 of 610 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.23 · 12.6% (77 of 610 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.29 · 4.4% (27 of 610 decks)
All sorceries (38)
- Reshape relevance 0.58 · 22.3% (136 of 610 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.55 · 20.8% (127 of 610 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.47 · 27.0% (165 of 610 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.47 · 24.3% (148 of 610 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.41 · 29.5% (180 of 610 decks)
- Follow the Bodies relevance 0.57 · 6.1% (37 of 610 decks)
- Over the Edge relevance 0.49 · 9.2% (56 of 610 decks)
- They Went This Way relevance 0.52 · 5.7% (35 of 610 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.43 · 9.5% (58 of 610 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.29 · 27.5% (168 of 610 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.46 · 4.3% (26 of 610 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.38 · 6.2% (38 of 610 decks)
- Root Out relevance 0.48 · 3.4% (21 of 610 decks)
- Hard Evidence relevance 0.45 · 3.4% (21 of 610 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.34 · 6.4% (39 of 610 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.30 · 10.7% (65 of 610 decks)
- Growth Curve relevance 0.32 · 6.7% (41 of 610 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.35 · 4.6% (28 of 610 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (32 of 610 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.25 · 14.6% (89 of 610 decks)
- Give // Take relevance 0.39 · 3.3% (20 of 610 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.23 · 13.9% (85 of 610 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.28 · 5.1% (31 of 610 decks)
- True Ancestry relevance 0.41 · 2.5% (15 of 610 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.25 · 7.9% (48 of 610 decks)
- Visions of Dominance relevance 0.39 · 2.5% (15 of 610 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (18 of 610 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.17 · 16.1% (98 of 610 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.15 · 27.4% (167 of 610 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.16 · 17.9% (109 of 610 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (18 of 610 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (122 of 610 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.14 · 12.5% (76 of 610 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.12 · 22.1% (135 of 610 decks)
- Oversimplify relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (16 of 610 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (15 of 610 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (18 of 610 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (16 of 610 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (5)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.52 · 5.9% (36 of 610 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.43 · 6.9% (42 of 610 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.39 · 10.8% (66 of 610 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.42 · 5.6% (34 of 610 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.31 · 7.4% (45 of 610 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.31 · 6.7% (41 of 610 decks)
All utility lands (44)
- Animal Sanctuary relevance 0.70 · 12.0% (73 of 610 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.51 · 37.7% (230 of 610 decks)
- Kitchen relevance 0.55 · 12.6% (77 of 610 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.44 · 15.7% (96 of 610 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.40 · 24.1% (147 of 610 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.44 · 13.3% (81 of 610 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.51 · 5.2% (32 of 610 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.38 · 18.0% (110 of 610 decks)
- Vastwood Fortification // Vastwood Thicket relevance 0.46 · 4.9% (30 of 610 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.31 · 27.9% (170 of 610 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.37 · 11.5% (70 of 610 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.36 · 8.0% (49 of 610 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.24 · 35.4% (216 of 610 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.33 · 9.0% (55 of 610 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.24 · 29.5% (180 of 610 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.27 · 15.9% (97 of 610 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.33 · 6.7% (41 of 610 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.31 · 9.0% (55 of 610 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.23 · 25.6% (156 of 610 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.29 · 8.7% (53 of 610 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.41 · 3.1% (19 of 610 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.25 · 14.9% (91 of 610 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.29 · 6.6% (40 of 610 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.21 · 27.9% (170 of 610 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.27 · 5.6% (34 of 610 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.39 · 2.5% (15 of 610 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.25 · 7.7% (47 of 610 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.21 · 15.1% (92 of 610 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.24 · 6.9% (42 of 610 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.22 · 7.2% (44 of 610 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.17 · 17.7% (108 of 610 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.18 · 14.1% (86 of 610 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.27 · 3.1% (19 of 610 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.23 · 3.9% (24 of 610 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.19 · 6.7% (41 of 610 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (22 of 610 decks)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (16 of 610 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.14 · 16.9% (103 of 610 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.11 · 37.5% (229 of 610 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.24 · 2.8% (17 of 610 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (30 of 610 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (16 of 610 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (23 of 610 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.14 · 4.4% (27 of 610 decks)
All lands (48)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.44 · 29.5% (180 of 610 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.43 · 31.0% (189 of 610 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.48 · 10.2% (62 of 610 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.37 · 8.2% (50 of 610 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.31 · 12.1% (74 of 610 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.34 · 7.2% (44 of 610 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.31 · 10.7% (65 of 610 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.26 · 18.5% (113 of 610 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.30 · 9.7% (59 of 610 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.25 · 20.5% (125 of 610 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.28 · 12.0% (73 of 610 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.31 · 7.2% (44 of 610 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.28 · 8.4% (51 of 610 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.22 · 22.6% (138 of 610 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.26 · 11.5% (70 of 610 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.25 · 12.1% (74 of 610 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.19 · 36.1% (220 of 610 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.25 · 10.7% (65 of 610 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.20 · 27.5% (168 of 610 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.26 · 9.7% (59 of 610 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.26 · 9.0% (55 of 610 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.21 · 19.8% (121 of 610 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.25 · 8.5% (52 of 610 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.18 · 35.9% (219 of 610 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.14 · 45.7% (279 of 610 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.24 · 4.4% (27 of 610 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.13 · 47.9% (292 of 610 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.12 · 53.6% (327 of 610 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.10 · 62.8% (383 of 610 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.20 · 6.1% (37 of 610 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (23 of 610 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.12 · 46.4% (283 of 610 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.17 · 11.6% (71 of 610 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.13 · 32.0% (195 of 610 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.19 · 6.2% (38 of 610 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.13 · 25.9% (158 of 610 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (15 of 610 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.16 · 7.5% (46 of 610 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.16 · 7.4% (45 of 610 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (17 of 610 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.08 · 62.1% (379 of 610 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.15 · 5.2% (32 of 610 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (18 of 610 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (23 of 610 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (22 of 610 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 83.6% (510 of 610 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 90.8% (554 of 610 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 91.3% (557 of 610 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Lonis, Genetics Expert, from 610 real Commander decks.