Emergent Woodwurm
Played in 3,356 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
33.4% Green
All commanders (30)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 5.30 · 72.0% (1,743 of 2,420 decks)
- Runadi, Behemoth Caller relevance 2.80 · 25.9% (208 of 804 decks)
- Bugenhagen, Wise Elder relevance 2.29 · 20.8% (109 of 523 decks)
- Maular, the Next Evolution relevance 1.86 · 9.9% (168 of 1,696 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 1.40 · 5.6% (163 of 2,925 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 1.12 · 5.7% (56 of 988 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 1.05 · 5.4% (47 of 864 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.79 · 4.6% (24 of 525 decks)
- Radagast the Brown relevance 0.77 · 4.0% (29 of 724 decks)
- Susan Foreman relevance 0.76 · 30.0% (3 of 10 decks)
- Oviya, Automech Artisan relevance 0.73 · 2.7% (59 of 2,174 decks)
- Vorinclex // The Grand Evolution relevance 0.64 · 3.1% (25 of 802 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.63 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.62 · 4.5% (12 of 269 decks)
- Black Tom Cassidy relevance 0.60 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.57 · 3.5% (14 of 396 decks)
- Hua Tuo, Honored Physician relevance 0.52 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.52 · 1.8% (44 of 2,434 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.48 · 3.0% (11 of 365 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 0.45 · 1.3% (70 of 5,464 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // The Prismatic Piper relevance 0.45 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.44 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.42 · 1.7% (22 of 1,266 decks)
- Radagast of Rhosgobel relevance 0.36 · 1.1% (54 of 5,106 decks)
- Michelangelo, Improviser relevance 0.36 · 2.4% (8 of 335 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Durnan of the Yawning Portal relevance 0.36 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Leatherhead, Iron Gator relevance 0.36 · 3.8% (4 of 104 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.36 · 3.2% (5 of 156 decks)
- Tyvar, the Pummeler relevance 0.35 · 2.2% (8 of 356 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.34 · 1.6% (15 of 959 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 2.22 · 53.4% (1,792 of 3,356 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 1.95 · 44.7% (1,500 of 3,356 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 1.91 · 41.1% (1,380 of 3,356 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 1.87 · 46.5% (1,562 of 3,356 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 1.77 · 55.6% (1,867 of 3,356 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 1.76 · 42.5% (1,426 of 3,356 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 1.76 · 37.1% (1,246 of 3,356 decks)
- Sifter Wurm relevance 1.71 · 36.7% (1,231 of 3,356 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 1.70 · 58.0% (1,947 of 3,356 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 1.65 · 36.1% (1,212 of 3,356 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 1.64 · 37.8% (1,268 of 3,356 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 1.62 · 33.0% (1,107 of 3,356 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 1.61 · 58.6% (1,967 of 3,356 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 1.60 · 34.8% (1,168 of 3,356 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 1.60 · 54.8% (1,840 of 3,356 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 1.56 · 33.7% (1,131 of 3,356 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 1.55 · 49.9% (1,676 of 3,356 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 1.42 · 31.3% (1,049 of 3,356 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 1.36 · 63.8% (2,140 of 3,356 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 1.32 · 31.9% (1,072 of 3,356 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 1.30 · 27.0% (907 of 3,356 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 1.30 · 27.0% (906 of 3,356 decks)
- Crush of Wurms relevance 1.25 · 24.9% (835 of 3,356 decks)
- Symbiotic Wurm relevance 1.14 · 21.8% (733 of 3,356 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 1.12 · 31.8% (1,067 of 3,356 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 1.09 · 39.6% (1,330 of 3,356 decks)
- Soul Swallower relevance 1.06 · 19.9% (669 of 3,356 decks)
- Elfhame Wurm relevance 0.93 · 18.0% (603 of 3,356 decks)
- Carnage Wurm relevance 0.93 · 16.8% (565 of 3,356 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.91 · 34.1% (1,143 of 3,356 decks)
All creatures (36)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 2.22 · 53.4% (1,792 of 3,356 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 1.95 · 44.7% (1,500 of 3,356 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 1.91 · 41.1% (1,380 of 3,356 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 1.87 · 46.5% (1,562 of 3,356 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 1.77 · 55.6% (1,867 of 3,356 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 1.76 · 42.5% (1,426 of 3,356 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 1.76 · 37.1% (1,246 of 3,356 decks)
- Sifter Wurm relevance 1.71 · 36.7% (1,231 of 3,356 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 1.70 · 58.0% (1,947 of 3,356 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 1.65 · 36.1% (1,212 of 3,356 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 1.64 · 37.8% (1,268 of 3,356 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 1.62 · 33.0% (1,107 of 3,356 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 1.61 · 58.6% (1,967 of 3,356 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 1.60 · 34.8% (1,168 of 3,356 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 1.60 · 54.8% (1,840 of 3,356 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 1.56 · 33.7% (1,131 of 3,356 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 1.42 · 31.3% (1,049 of 3,356 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 1.36 · 63.8% (2,140 of 3,356 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 1.32 · 31.9% (1,072 of 3,356 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 1.30 · 27.0% (907 of 3,356 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 1.30 · 27.0% (906 of 3,356 decks)
- Symbiotic Wurm relevance 1.14 · 21.8% (733 of 3,356 decks)
- Soul Swallower relevance 1.06 · 19.9% (669 of 3,356 decks)
- Elfhame Wurm relevance 0.93 · 18.0% (603 of 3,356 decks)
- Carnage Wurm relevance 0.93 · 16.8% (565 of 3,356 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.91 · 34.1% (1,143 of 3,356 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.81 · 24.2% (811 of 3,356 decks)
- Hazard of the Dunes relevance 0.78 · 14.5% (487 of 3,356 decks)
- Witherscale Wurm relevance 0.76 · 13.2% (444 of 3,356 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.73 · 24.1% (809 of 3,356 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.72 · 43.3% (1,452 of 3,356 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.69 · 39.8% (1,337 of 3,356 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.65 · 28.5% (956 of 3,356 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.64 · 37.8% (1,268 of 3,356 decks)
- Deathcoil Wurm relevance 0.63 · 10.5% (354 of 3,356 decks)
- Iron-Craw Crusher relevance 0.62 · 10.8% (364 of 3,356 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.86 · 24.2% (811 of 3,356 decks)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.76 · 20.0% (671 of 3,356 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.63 · 31.5% (1,057 of 3,356 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.63 · 18.6% (623 of 3,356 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 1.55 · 49.9% (1,676 of 3,356 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 1.12 · 31.8% (1,067 of 3,356 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 1.09 · 39.6% (1,330 of 3,356 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.76 · 37.0% (1,243 of 3,356 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.64 · 43.2% (1,451 of 3,356 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Crush of Wurms relevance 1.25 · 24.9% (835 of 3,356 decks)
- Wurmcalling relevance 0.75 · 13.7% (461 of 3,356 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.75 · 31.6% (1,061 of 3,356 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.80 · 31.3% (1,052 of 3,356 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.77 · 59.6% (2,000 of 3,356 decks)
EDH data for Emergent Woodwurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 3,356 real decks.